Suppr超能文献

DN4在筛查神经性疼痛综合征中的敏感性。

Sensitivity of the DN4 in Screening for Neuropathic Pain Syndromes.

作者信息

VanDenKerkhof Elizabeth G, Stitt Larry, Clark Alexander J, Gordon Allan, Lynch Mary, Morley-Forster Patricia K, Nathan Howard J, Smyth Catherine, Toth Cory, Ware Mark A, Moulin Dwight E

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, School of Nursing, Queens University, Kingston.

LW Stitt Statistical Services.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2018 Jan;34(1):30-36. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000512.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Several tools have been developed to screen for neuropathic pain. This study examined the sensitivity of the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4) in screening for various neuropathic pain syndromes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective observational study was conducted in 7 Canadian academic pain centers between April 2008 and December 2011. All newly admitted patients (n=2199) were approached and 789 eligible participants form the sample for this analysis. Baseline data included demographics, disability, health-related quality of life, and pain characteristics. Diagnosis of probable or definite neuropathic pain was on the basis of history, neurological examination, and ancillary diagnostic tests.

RESULTS

The mean age of study participants was 53.5 years and 54.7% were female; 83% (n=652/789) screened positive on the DN4 (≥4/10). The sensitivity was highest for central neuropathic pain (92.5%, n=74/80) and generalized polyneuropathies (92.1%, n=139/151), and lowest for trigeminal neuralgia (69.2%, n=36/52). After controlling for confounders, the sensitivity of the DN4 remained significantly higher for individuals with generalized polyneuropathies (odds ratio [OR]=4.35; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.15, 8.81), central neuropathic pain (OR=3.76; 95% CI: 1.56, 9.07), and multifocal polyneuropathies (OR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.03, 2.85) compared with focal neuropathies.

DISCUSSION

The DN4 performed well; however, sensitivity varied by syndrome and the lowest sensitivity was found for trigeminal neuralgia. A positive DN4 was associated with greater pain catastrophizing, disability and anxiety/depression, which may be because of disease severity, and/or these scales may reflect magnification of sensory symptoms and findings. Future research should examine how the DN4 could be refined to improve its sensitivity for specific neuropathic pain conditions.

摘要

目的

已开发出多种工具用于筛查神经性疼痛。本研究考察了四题神经病理性疼痛量表(DN4)在筛查各种神经性疼痛综合征时的敏感性。

材料与方法

这项前瞻性观察性研究于2008年4月至2011年12月在加拿大的7个学术性疼痛中心进行。研究人员接触了所有新入院患者(n = 2199),789名符合条件的参与者构成了本分析的样本。基线数据包括人口统计学资料、残疾情况、健康相关生活质量和疼痛特征。可能或确诊的神经性疼痛诊断基于病史、神经系统检查及辅助诊断测试。

结果

研究参与者的平均年龄为53.5岁,女性占54.7%;83%(n = 652/789)的参与者在DN量表上筛查呈阳性(≥4/10)。中央性神经性疼痛的敏感性最高(92.5%,n = 74/80),其次是全身性多发性神经病(92.1%,n = 139/151),而三叉神经痛的敏感性最低(69.2%,n = 36/52)。在控制混杂因素后,与局灶性神经病相比,DN4对全身性多发性神经病(优势比[OR]=4.35;95%置信区间[CI]:2.15, 8.81)、中央性神经性疼痛(OR = 3.76;95% CI:1.56, 9.07)和多灶性多发性神经病(OR = 1.72;95% CI:1.03, 2.85)患者的敏感性仍显著更高。

讨论

DN4表现良好;然而,其敏感性因综合征而异,三叉神经痛的敏感性最低。DN4呈阳性与更高的疼痛灾难化、残疾及焦虑/抑郁相关,这可能是由于疾病严重程度,和/或这些量表可能反映了感觉症状和体征的放大。未来的研究应考察如何改进DN4以提高其对特定神经性疼痛状况的敏感性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验