• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无需皮肤试验的口服激发试验可安全排除临床上显著的迟发性青霉素超敏反应。

Oral Challenge without Skin Testing Safely Excludes Clinically Significant Delayed-Onset Penicillin Hypersensitivity.

作者信息

Confino-Cohen Ronit, Rosman Yossi, Meir-Shafrir Keren, Stauber Tali, Lachover-Roth Idit, Hershko Alon, Goldberg Arnon

机构信息

Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Meir General Hospital, Kfar-Saba, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, Meir General Hospital, Kfar-Saba, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 May-Jun;5(3):669-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.023.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.023
PMID:28483317
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Penicillins are the drug family most commonly associated with hypersensitivity reactions. Current guidelines recommend negative skin tests (ST) before re-administering penicillins to patients with previous nonimmediate reactions (NIR).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to examine whether ST are necessary before re-administering penicillin to patients with NIR.

METHODS

Patients with NIR to penicillins starting longer than 1 hour after last dose administration or starting any time after the first treatment day or patients with vague recollection of their reaction underwent penicillin ST. Disregarding ST results, patients were challenged with the relevant penicillins. One-tenth of the therapeutic dose followed by the full dose was administered at 1-hour interval and patients continued taking the full dose for 5 days.

RESULTS

A total of 710 patients with alleged BL allergy were evaluated. Patients with a history of immediate reaction (52, 7.3%) or cephalosporin allergy (16, 2.2%) were excluded. Of the remaining 642 patients, 62.3% had negative ST, 5.3% positive ST, and 32.4% equivocal ST. A total of 617 (96.1%) patients were challenged. Immediate reaction was observed in 9 patients (1.5%): 1-positive ST, 7-negative ST, and 1-equivocal ST (P = .7). Late reaction to the first-day challenge occurred in 24 patients (4%). An at-home challenge was continued by 491 patients. Complete 5-day and partial challenges were well tolerated by 417 (85%) and 44 patients (8.9%), respectively, disregarding ST results. Thirty patients (6.1%) developed mild reactions to the home challenge regardless of their ST results.

CONCLUSION

A 5-day oral challenge without preceding ST is safe and sufficient to exclude penicillin allergy after NIR developing during penicillin treatment.

摘要

背景

青霉素是最常与超敏反应相关的药物类别。当前指南建议,对于既往有非速发型反应(NIR)的患者,在重新使用青霉素之前应进行皮肤试验(ST)阴性。

目的

本研究的目的是探讨对于有NIR的患者,重新使用青霉素之前是否有必要进行ST。

方法

对末次给药后1小时以上开始出现NIR、首次治疗日后任何时间开始出现NIR的青霉素患者,或对反应记忆模糊的患者进行青霉素ST。不顾ST结果,让患者接受相关青霉素激发试验。以治疗剂量的十分之一开始,之后按1小时间隔给予全剂量,患者持续服用全剂量5天。

结果

共评估了710例疑似青霉素过敏患者。有速发型反应史(52例,7.3%)或头孢菌素过敏史(16例,2.2%)的患者被排除。其余642例患者中,62.3%的ST结果为阴性,5.3%为阳性,32.4%为可疑。共有617例(96.1%)患者接受了激发试验。9例患者(1.5%)出现速发型反应:1例ST阳性,7例ST阴性,1例ST可疑(P = 0.7)。首日激发试验出现迟发型反应的有24例患者(4%)。491例患者继续进行家庭激发试验。无论ST结果如何,417例(85%)完成5天全程激发试验和44例(8.9%)部分激发试验的患者耐受性良好。30例患者(6.1%)无论ST结果如何,对家庭激发试验均出现轻度反应。

结论

对于青霉素治疗期间发生NIR后,在不进行预先ST的情况下进行5天口服激发试验,对于排除青霉素过敏是安全且充分的。

相似文献

1
Oral Challenge without Skin Testing Safely Excludes Clinically Significant Delayed-Onset Penicillin Hypersensitivity.无需皮肤试验的口服激发试验可安全排除临床上显著的迟发性青霉素超敏反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 May-Jun;5(3):669-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.02.023.
2
Positive Skin Test or Specific IgE to Penicillin Does Not Reliably Predict Penicillin Allergy.青霉素皮肤试验阳性或特异性IgE检测结果并不能可靠地预测青霉素过敏。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 May-Jun;5(3):676-683. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.03.014.
3
Diagnosis of penicillin allergy revisited: the value of case history, skin testing, specific IgE and prolonged challenge.重新审视青霉素过敏的诊断:病史、皮肤试验、特异性 IgE 和延长激发试验的价值。
Allergy. 2013 Aug;68(8):1057-64. doi: 10.1111/all.12195. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
4
Diagnosis of penicillin, amoxicillin, and cephalosporin allergy: reliability of examination assessed by skin testing and oral challenge.青霉素、阿莫西林和头孢菌素过敏的诊断:通过皮肤试验和口服激发试验评估检查的可靠性。
J Pediatr. 1998 Jan;132(1):137-43. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(98)70499-8.
5
Efficacy and Safety of 5-Day Challenge for the Evaluation of Nonsevere Amoxicillin Allergy in Children.5 日挑战评估儿童非重症阿莫西林过敏的疗效和安全性。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Sep-Oct;6(5):1673-1680. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.01.030. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
6
Skin testing and oral amoxicillin challenge in the outpatient allergy and clinical immunology clinic in pregnant women with penicillin allergy.在有青霉素过敏史的孕妇的门诊过敏和临床免疫学诊所中进行皮肤试验和口服阿莫西林激发试验。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020 Dec;125(6):646-651. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
7
Skin testing and oral penicillin challenge in patients with a history of remote penicillin allergy.有青霉素远期过敏史患者的皮肤试验及口服青霉素激发试验
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Jan;100(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60402-4.
8
Risk of Allergic Reactions to Recurrent Intravenous Penicillin Administration in Penicillin Skin Test Negative Patients.青霉素皮试阴性患者反复静脉注射青霉素致过敏反应的风险。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Jan-Feb;6(1):196-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
9
Diagnostic value and safety of penicillin skin tests in children with immediate penicillin allergy.青霉素皮试在儿童即刻青霉素过敏中的诊断价值和安全性。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2020 Nov 1;41(6):442-448. doi: 10.2500/aap.2020.41.200082.
10
Diagnosing nonimmediate reactions to penicillins by in vivo tests.通过体内试验诊断对青霉素的非即刻反应。
Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002 Oct;129(2):169-74. doi: 10.1159/000065876.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Beta-Lactam Allergy De-Labeling Strategies Safely Empower Geriatric Care?β-内酰胺类过敏去标签策略能否安全地助力老年护理?
J Clin Med. 2025 May 15;14(10):3476. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103476.
2
Direct oral provocation test with beta-lactams in Brazilian children and adolescents.巴西儿童和青少年使用β-内酰胺类药物的直接口服激发试验。
J Pediatr (Rio J). 2025 May-Jun;101(3):381-387. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2024.11.003. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
3
Challenging dogmas: Intravenous versus oral beta-lactam antibiotic provocation tests.挑战传统观念:静脉注射与口服β-内酰胺类抗生素激发试验
World Allergy Organ J. 2024 May 24;17(6):100914. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2024.100914. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Introduction of a penicillin allergy de-labelling program with direct oral challenge and its effects on utilization of beta-lactam antimicrobials: a multicenter retrospective parallel cohort study.一项采用直接口服激发试验的青霉素过敏去标签计划及其对β-内酰胺类抗菌药物使用的影响:一项多中心回顾性平行队列研究
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024 Mar 5;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00877-9.
5
Approach for delabeling beta-lactam allergy in children.儿童β-内酰胺类药物过敏标签去除方法。
Front Allergy. 2023 Nov 15;4:1298335. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1298335. eCollection 2023.
6
Standardized testing and written communication improve patient understanding of beta-lactam allergy testing outcomes: A multicenter, prospective study.标准化测试和书面沟通可提高患者对β-内酰胺类药物过敏测试结果的理解:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2022 Jun 2;1(3):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jacig.2022.05.003. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
The state and consideration for skin test of β-lactam antibiotics in pediatrics.β-内酰胺类抗生素皮肤试验在中国儿科人群中的应用现状与思考。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jun 15;13:1147976. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1147976. eCollection 2023.
8
Penicillin allergy delabeling: Opportunities for implementation and dissemination.青霉素过敏标签去除:实施和推广的机会。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 May;130(5):554-564. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.12.023. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
9
Tools to improve the diagnosis and management of T-cell mediated adverse drug reactions.改善T细胞介导的药物不良反应诊断与管理的工具
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Oct 13;9:923991. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.923991. eCollection 2022.
10
The Impact of Reported β-Lactam Allergy on Clinical Outcomes and Antibiotic Use Among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.报告的β-内酰胺类药物过敏对实体器官移植受者临床结局及抗生素使用的影响
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 29;9(8):ofac384. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofac384. eCollection 2022 Aug.