• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结构化报告模板对肝细胞癌诊断的CT和MRI报告质量的影响。

Impact of a Structured Report Template on the Quality of CT and MRI Reports for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis.

作者信息

Flusberg Milana, Ganeles Jeremy, Ekinci Tulay, Goldberg-Stein Shlomit, Paroder Viktoriya, Kobi Mariya, Chernyak Victoria

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.

Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Sep;14(9):1206-1211. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.050. Epub 2017 May 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.050
PMID:28483546
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the impact of a Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) structured template on quality of reports for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A departmental structured LI-RADS template was adopted in April 2015. CT and MRI reports from September 2014 to February 2016 with probable or definite HCC were reviewed. Reporting of the following was recorded for each lesion and compared between template and free-text reports: (1) LI-RADS category, (2) Couinaud segment, and (3) unequivocal description of presence or absence of major LI-RADS HCC features: arterial phase hyperenhancement, "washout," diameter, threshold growth, and "capsule."

RESULTS

There were 306 definite or probable HCCs, 125 (40.8%) reported with free text and 181 (59.2%) with the template. LI-RADS category was reported in 23 of 125 (18.4%) HCCs with free text and in 178 of 181 (98.3%) HCCs with the template (P < .001). Couinaud segment was reported in 102 of 125 (81.6%) HCCs with free text and in 181 of 181 (100%) HCCs with the template (P < .001). Diameter was reported in 118 of 125 (94.4%) HCCs with free text and in 181 of 181 (100%) HCCs with the template (P = .001). Threshold growth was reported in 36 of 125 (28.8%) HCCs with free text and in 169 of 181 (93.4%) HCCs with the template (P < .001). Arterial phase hyperenhancement was reported in 101 of 125 (80.8%) HCCs with free text and in 177 of 181 (97.8%) HCCs with the template (P < .001). Washout was reported in 93 of 125 (74.4%) HCCs with free text and in 178 of 181 (98.3%) HCCs with the template (P < .001). Capsule was reported in 24 of 125 (19.2%) HCCs with free text and in 176 of 181 (97.2%) HCCs with the template (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of structured LI-RADS template resulted in more comprehensive and consistent reporting of major HCC features and LI-RADS category compared with free-text reporting.

摘要

目的

评估肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)结构化模板对肝细胞癌(HCC)报告质量的影响。

材料与方法

2015年4月采用科室结构化LI-RADS模板。回顾2014年9月至2016年2月间可能或确诊为HCC的CT和MRI报告。记录每个病灶的以下报告内容,并在模板报告和自由文本报告之间进行比较:(1)LI-RADS类别,(2)肝段,(3)对主要LI-RADS HCC特征(动脉期强化、“廓清”、直径、阈值生长和“包膜”)存在与否的明确描述。

结果

共有306个确诊或可能的HCC,其中125个(40.8%)采用自由文本报告,181个(59.2%)采用模板报告。125个HCC中有23个(18.4%)采用自由文本报告了LI-RADS类别,181个HCC中有178个(98.3%)采用模板报告了LI-RADS类别(P <.001)。125个HCC中有102个(81.6%)采用自由文本报告了肝段,181个HCC中有181个(100%)采用模板报告了肝段(P <.001)。125个HCC中有118个(94.4%)采用自由文本报告了直径,181个HCC中有181个(100%)采用模板报告了直径(P =.001)。125个HCC中有36个(28.8%)采用自由文本报告了阈值生长,181个HCC中有169个(93.4%)采用模板报告了阈值生长(P <.001)。125个HCC中有101个(80.8%)采用自由文本报告了动脉期强化,181个HCC中有177个(97.8%)采用模板报告了动脉期强化(P <.001)。125个HCC中有93个(74.4%)采用自由文本报告了廓清,181个HCC中有178个(98.3%)采用模板报告了廓清(P <.001)。125个HCC中有24个(19.2%)采用自由文本报告了包膜,181个HCC中有176个(97.2%)采用模板报告了包膜(P <.001)。

结论

与自由文本报告相比,使用结构化LI-RADS模板可使主要HCC特征和LI-RADS类别的报告更全面、更一致。

相似文献

1
Impact of a Structured Report Template on the Quality of CT and MRI Reports for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis.结构化报告模板对肝细胞癌诊断的CT和MRI报告质量的影响。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2017 Sep;14(9):1206-1211. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.050. Epub 2017 May 6.
2
Rate of observation and inter-observer agreement for LI-RADS major features at CT and MRI in 184 pathology proven hepatocellular carcinomas.在 184 例经病理证实的肝细胞癌中,CT 和 MRI 上 LI-RADS 主要特征的观察率和观察者间一致性。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 May;41(5):963-9. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0623-5.
3
Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Discordance Between Computed Tomography and Gadoxetate-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Major Features.肝脏影像报告和数据系统:计算机断层扫描与钆塞酸二钠增强磁共振成像在检测肝细胞癌主要特征方面的不一致性
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2018 Jan/Feb;42(1):155-161. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000642.
4
Interobserver and intermodality agreement of standardized algorithms for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in high-risk patients: CEUS-LI-RADS versus MRI-LI-RADS.高危人群肝细胞癌无创诊断标准化算法的观察者间和模态间一致性:CEUS-LI-RADS 与 MRI-LI-RADS。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Oct;28(10):4254-4264. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5379-1. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
5
LI-RADS-CEUS - Proposal for a Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Algorithm for the Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in High-Risk Populations.肝脏影像报告和数据系统-超声造影 - 关于高危人群肝细胞癌诊断的超声造影算法提案
Ultraschall Med. 2016 Dec;37(6):627-634. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-112221. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
6
CT/MRI and CEUS LI-RADS Major Features Association with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.CT/MRI 和 CEUS LI-RADS 主要特征与肝细胞癌的关联:个体患者数据的荟萃分析。
Radiology. 2022 Feb;302(2):326-335. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021211244. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
7
Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: ESCULAP versus CEUS-LI-RADS.超声造影对肝细胞癌鉴别诊断的诊断准确性:爱克发与CEUS-LI-RADS对比
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Sep;29(9):1036-1044. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000916.
8
Diagnostic Performance of CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2017 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.CT/MRI肝脏影像报告和数据系统v2017对肝细胞癌的诊断性能:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Liver Int. 2020 Jun;40(6):1488-1497. doi: 10.1111/liv.14424. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
Accuracy of the diagnostic evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma with LI-RADS.使用肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)对肝细胞癌进行诊断评估的准确性。
Acta Radiol. 2018 Feb;59(2):140-146. doi: 10.1177/0284185117716700. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
10
LI-RADS for CT diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: performance of major and ancillary features.LI-RADS 用于 CT 诊断肝细胞癌:主要特征和辅助特征的性能。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Feb;44(2):517-528. doi: 10.1007/s00261-018-1762-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Software-assisted structured reporting and semi-automated TNM classification for NSCLC staging in a multicenter proof of concept study.多中心概念验证研究中用于非小细胞肺癌分期的软件辅助结构化报告和半自动TNM分类
Insights Imaging. 2024 Oct 28;15(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01836-z.
2
Lessons learned: strategies for implementing and the ongoing use of LI-RADS in your practice.经验教训:在实践中实施和持续使用肝脏影像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)的策略。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2025 May;50(5):2053-2065. doi: 10.1007/s00261-024-04643-8. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
3
Perceptions of radiologists on structured reporting for cancer imaging-a survey by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI).
放射科医生对癌症影像结构化报告的看法——欧洲肿瘤影像学会(ESOI)的一项调查
Eur Radiol. 2024 Aug;34(8):5120-5130. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10397-6. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
4
Prevalence of different LI-RADS v2018 categories in high-risk patients undergoing CT- or MRI-based screening for hepatocellular carcinoma.LI-RADS v2018 不同类别在接受基于 CT 或 MRI 的肝细胞癌筛查的高危患者中的流行情况。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2023 Dec;48(12):3696-3702. doi: 10.1007/s00261-023-04040-7. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
5
LI-RADS: Looking Back, Looking Forward.LI-RADS:回顾与展望。
Radiology. 2023 Apr;307(1):e222801. doi: 10.1148/radiol.222801. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
6
Structured bone marrow report as an assessment tool in patients with hematopoietic disorders.结构化骨髓报告作为造血系统疾病患者的一种评估工具。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 Jul;12(7):3717-3724. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-1191.
7
Clinical Routine and Necessary Advances in Soft Tissue Tumor Imaging Based on the ESSR Guideline: Initial Findings.基于 ESSR 指南的软组织肿瘤影像学的临床常规和必要进展:初步发现。
Tomography. 2022 Jun 17;8(3):1586-1594. doi: 10.3390/tomography8030131.
8
Structured reporting of x-ray mammography in the first diagnosis of breast cancer: a Delphi consensus proposal.X 射线乳腺摄影在乳腺癌首次诊断中的结构化报告:德尔菲共识建议。
Radiol Med. 2022 May;127(5):471-483. doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01478-5. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
9
Radiologist Productivity Analytics: Factors Impacting Abdominal Pelvic CT Exam Reporting Times.放射科医生生产力分析:影响腹部盆腔 CT 检查报告时间的因素。
J Digit Imaging. 2022 Apr;35(2):87-97. doi: 10.1007/s10278-021-00548-w. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
10
Assessing the Impact of Structured Reports for Fluoroscopic Double-Contrast Barium Esophagrams.评估荧光透视双对比钡餐食管造影中结构化报告的影响。
Dysphagia. 2022 Oct;37(5):1266-1270. doi: 10.1007/s00455-021-10382-5. Epub 2021 Nov 20.