Butler Lynne D, Guzzie-Peck Peggy, Hartke James, Bogdanffy Matthew S, Will Yvonne, Diaz Dolores, Mortimer-Cassen Elisabeth, Derzi Mazin, Greene Nigel, DeGeorge Joseph J
Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, Eastern Point Rd, Groton, CT, 06340, USA.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 1400 McKean Road, Spring House, PA, 19477, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Jul 31;87 Suppl 3:S1-S15. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 5.
The transition from nonclinical to First-in-Human (FIH) testing is one of the most challenging steps in drug development. In response to serious outcomes in a recent Phase 1 trial (sponsored by Bial), IQ Consortium/DruSafe member companies reviewed their nonclinical approach to progress small molecules safely to FIH trials. As a common practice, safety evaluation begins with target selection and continues through iterative in silico and in vitro screening to identify molecules with increased probability of acceptable in vivo safety profiles. High attrition routinely occurs during this phase. In vivo exploratory and pivotal FIH-enabling toxicity studies are then conducted to identify molecules with a favorable benefit-risk profile for humans. The recent serious incident has reemphasized the importance of nonclinical testing plans that are customized to the target, the molecule, and the intended clinical plan. Despite the challenges and inherent risks of transitioning from nonclinical to clinical testing, Phase 1 studies have a remarkably good safety record. Given the rapid scientific evolution of safety evaluation, testing paradigms and regulatory guidance must evolve with emerging science. The authors posit that the practices described herein, together with science-based risk assessment and management, support safe FIH trials while advancing development of important new medicines.
从非临床研究到首次人体(FIH)试验的转变是药物研发中最具挑战性的步骤之一。针对近期一项1期试验(由Bial赞助)中出现的严重结果,IQ联盟/DruSafe成员公司审查了其非临床研究方法,以便将小分子药物安全推进到FIH试验阶段。通常,安全性评估始于靶点选择,并通过反复的计算机模拟和体外筛选持续进行,以识别具有可接受体内安全性特征更高可能性的分子。在此阶段经常会出现高淘汰率。然后进行体内探索性和关键性的支持FIH试验的毒性研究,以识别对人类具有良好效益风险特征的分子。最近的严重事件再次强调了针对靶点、分子和预期临床计划定制非临床测试计划的重要性。尽管从非临床研究过渡到临床试验存在挑战和固有风险,但1期研究有着相当出色的安全记录。鉴于安全性评估的科学发展迅速,测试范式和监管指南必须随着新兴科学的发展而演变。作者认为,本文所述的做法,连同基于科学的风险评估和管理,在推进重要新药研发的同时,支持安全的FIH试验。