Suppr超能文献

整合协会建议,为当前和未来药物开发范式中的动物使用提供正当理由。

Integration of Consortia Recommendations for Justification of Animal Use Within Current and Future Drug Development Paradigms.

机构信息

1 National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs), London, United Kingdom.

2 Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.

出版信息

Int J Toxicol. 2019 Jul/Aug;38(4):319-325. doi: 10.1177/1091581819852922. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

Abstract

The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries continually review the requirements for, and relevance of, safety assessment strategies. Various industry consortia are currently discussing and reviewing data on a range of topics with respect to regulatory toxicology programs. These consortia are charged with critical evaluation of data and the identification of opportunities to promote best practice and to introduce improved approaches to safety assessment. Such improvements may include enhanced predictivity, more efficient ways of working, and opportunities for promoting and implementing the 3Rs (replacement, refinement, or reduction). As each consortium is considering a distinct question, individual outputs and recommendations could be perceived to be conflicting. However, a common theme embraced by the consortia represented here is exploration of the most appropriate use of animals for the safety assessment of new medicinal products. This short review summarizes presentations and discussions from a symposium describing the work of four industry consortia and considers whether their recommendations can be aligned into realistic approaches to improve future toxicology testing strategies, highlighting justification for the appropriate use of different animal species and opportunities for reductions in animal use without compromising patient safety.

摘要

制药和生物技术行业不断审查安全评估策略的要求和相关性。目前,各种行业联盟正在就一系列与监管毒理学计划相关的主题讨论和审查数据。这些联盟负责对数据进行批判性评估,并确定促进最佳实践和引入改进的安全评估方法的机会。这些改进可能包括提高预测性、更高效的工作方式,以及促进和实施 3R(替代、优化或减少)的机会。由于每个联盟都在考虑一个不同的问题,因此个别产出和建议可能会被认为存在冲突。然而,这里代表的联盟所共同接受的一个主题是探索最适合用于新药物安全性评估的动物使用方式。这篇简短的综述总结了一个研讨会的演讲和讨论,该研讨会描述了四个行业联盟的工作,并考虑了他们的建议是否可以整合成改进未来毒理学测试策略的现实方法,强调了使用不同动物物种的合理性以及在不影响患者安全的情况下减少动物使用的机会。

相似文献

1
Integration of Consortia Recommendations for Justification of Animal Use Within Current and Future Drug Development Paradigms.
Int J Toxicol. 2019 Jul/Aug;38(4):319-325. doi: 10.1177/1091581819852922. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
2
Use of animals for toxicology testing is necessary to ensure patient safety in pharmaceutical development.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Nov;70(2):439-41. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
4
Justification for species selection for pharmaceutical toxicity studies.
Toxicol Res (Camb). 2020 Nov 24;9(6):758-770. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfaa081. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
The current status of exposure-driven approaches for chemical safety assessment: A cross-sector perspective.
Toxicology. 2017 Aug 15;389:109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2017.07.018. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
6
Exploring Greater Flexibility for Chronic Toxicity Study Designs to Support Human Safety Assessment While Balancing 3Rs Considerations.
Int J Toxicol. 2024 Sep-Oct;43(5):456-463. doi: 10.1177/10915818241255885. Epub 2024 May 31.
7
Opportunities for use of one species for longer-term toxicology testing during drug development: A cross-industry evaluation.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2020 Jun;113:104624. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104624. Epub 2020 Feb 29.
8
Opportunities to Apply the 3Rs in Safety Assessment Programs.
ILAR J. 2016 Dec;57(2):234-245. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilw024.
9
Working in partnership to advance the 3Rs in toxicity testing.
Toxicology. 2010 Jan 12;267(1-3):14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.11.006. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
10
Aligning the 3Rs with new paradigms in the safety assessment of chemicals.
Toxicology. 2015 Apr 1;330:62-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2015.01.014.

本文引用的文献

1
Rethinking developmental toxicity testing: Evolution or revolution?
Birth Defects Res. 2018 Jun 1;110(10):840-850. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1212. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
5
Current nonclinical testing paradigms in support of safe clinical trials: An IQ Consortium DruSafe perspective.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Jul 31;87 Suppl 3:S1-S15. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.05.009. Epub 2017 May 5.
7
Assessing the predictive value of the rodent neurofunctional assessment for commonly reported adverse events in phase I clinical trials.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Oct;80:348-57. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验