Seifi Mahdieh, Nodehi Davood, Ghahramanloo Ahmad, Ahmadi Zahra, Farhangnia Azade, Saedi Morteza, Mozaffari Hamid Reza, Sharifi Roohollah
Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Department of Prosthodontics Dental School, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran.
Acta Inform Med. 2017 Mar;25(1):49-53. doi: 10.5455/aim.2017.25.49-53.
Due to increasing demands for a full mouth implant reconstructions and the fact that the most failures are associated with biomechanical complications, determining the effect of different occlusal patterns on these complications seems inevitable. The aim of this study is to compare affection of different occlusal designs in full mouth implant reconstructed patients on electromyographic activity of temporal and masseter muscles compared to natural dentition.
Thirty-two patients were included in this study, considering that 16 patients had natural dentition and the other 16 were full mouth implant reconstruction patients. In both groups, the participants were divided into two subgroups: 8 patients had canine guidance occlusal pattern and the other eight had a group function occlusal pattern. Muscle contractions were studied during both maximum intercuspation and lateral excursions to the point of intercanine contact using an electromyography device.
The average percentages of masseter muscle contraction in lateral excursions relative to maximum intercuspation were as follows: 72.20% in full mouth implant reconstruction patients with group function occlusion 69.49% in natural dentition with group function occlusion 58.85% in full mouth implant reconstruction patients with canine guidance occlusion 30.91% in natural dentition with canine guidance occlusion. The average percentages of temporal muscle contraction in lateral excursions relative to maximum intercuspation were as follows: 70.87% in full mouth implant reconstruction patients with group function occlusion 78.57% in natural dentition with group function occlusion 51.99% in full mouth implant reconstruction patients with canine guidance occlusion 31.55% in natural dentition with canine guidance occlusion.
A canine guidance occlusal pattern in both, natural dentition and full mouth implant-supported FDP, patients resulted in decreased muscle contraction. This decreasing is more significant in natural dentition and it is better to establish a canine guided occlusion in a full mouth reconstruction patient.
由于对全口种植修复的需求不断增加,且大多数失败与生物力学并发症相关,因此确定不同咬合模式对这些并发症的影响似乎是不可避免的。本研究的目的是比较全口种植修复患者中不同咬合设计对颞肌和咬肌肌电活动的影响,并与天然牙列进行对比。
本研究纳入了32名患者,其中16名患者为天然牙列,另外16名是全口种植修复患者。在两组中,参与者均被分为两个亚组:8名患者具有尖牙引导咬合模式,另外8名具有组牙功能咬合模式。使用肌电图设备在最大牙尖交错位和向尖牙间接触点的侧方运动过程中研究肌肉收缩情况。
咬肌在侧方运动相对于最大牙尖交错位时收缩的平均百分比如下:全口种植修复患者采用组牙功能咬合时为72.20%,天然牙列采用组牙功能咬合时为69.49%,全口种植修复患者采用尖牙引导咬合时为58.85%,天然牙列采用尖牙引导咬合时为30.91%。颞肌在侧方运动相对于最大牙尖交错位时收缩的平均百分比如下:全口种植修复患者采用组牙功能咬合时为70.87%,天然牙列采用组牙功能咬合时为78.57%,全口种植修复患者采用尖牙引导咬合时为51.99%,天然牙列采用尖牙引导咬合时为31.55%。
无论是天然牙列还是全口种植支持的固定义齿患者,尖牙引导咬合模式都会导致肌肉收缩减少。这种减少在天然牙列中更为显著,在全口重建患者中建立尖牙引导咬合更好。