Ferrario Virgilio F, Tartaglia Gianluca M, Maglione Michele, Simion Massimo, Sforza Chiarella
Functional Anatomy Research Center, Laboratorio di Anatomia Funzionale dell'Apparato Stomatognatico, Dipartimento di Anatomia Umana, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia and Facoltà di Scienze Motorie, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 Apr;15(2):219-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00974.x.
To compare the electromyographic (EMG) characteristics of masticatory muscles in patients with fixed implant-supported prostheses and implant overdentures.
Nineteen subjects aged 45-79 years were examined. Fourteen were edentulous and had been successfully rehabilitated with (a) maxillary and mandibular implant-supported fixed prostheses (seven patients); (b) mandibular implant overdentures and maxillary complete dentures (seven patients). Five control subjects had natural dentition or single/partial (no more than two teeth) tooth or implant fixed dentures. Surface EMG of the masseter and temporal muscles was performed during unilateral gum chewing and during maximum teeth clenching. To reduce biological and instrumental noise, all values were standardized as percentage of a maximum clenching on cotton rolls.
During clenching, temporal muscle symmetry was larger in control subjects and fixed implant-supported prosthesis patients than in overdenture patients (analysis of variance, P=0.005). No differences were found in masseter muscle symmetry or in muscular torque. Muscle activities (integrated areas of the EMG potentials over time) were significantly larger in control subjects than in implant-supported prosthesis patients (P=0.014). In both patient groups, a poor neuromuscular coordination during chewing, with altered muscular patterns, and a smaller left-right symmetry than in control subjects were found (P=0.05). No differences in masticatory frequency were found.
Surface EMG analysis of clenching and chewing showed that fixed implant-supported prostheses and implant overdentures were functionally equivalent. Neuromuscular coordination during chewing was inferior to that found in subjects with natural dentition.
比较固定种植支持式义齿和种植覆盖义齿患者咀嚼肌的肌电图(EMG)特征。
对19名年龄在45 - 79岁的受试者进行检查。其中14名为无牙颌患者,已成功通过以下方式修复:(a)上颌和下颌种植支持式固定义齿(7例患者);(b)下颌种植覆盖义齿和上颌全口义齿(7例患者)。5名对照受试者有天然牙列或单颗/部分(不超过两颗牙齿)牙齿或种植固定义齿。在单侧牙龈咀嚼和最大程度咬牙时进行咬肌和颞肌的表面肌电图检查。为减少生物和仪器噪声,所有值均标准化为在棉卷上最大咬牙力的百分比。
在咬牙时,对照受试者和固定种植支持式义齿患者的颞肌对称性大于覆盖义齿患者(方差分析,P = 0.005)。咬肌对称性或肌肉扭矩未发现差异。对照受试者的肌肉活动(EMG电位随时间的积分面积)显著大于种植支持式义齿患者(P = 0.014)。在两组患者中,均发现咀嚼时神经肌肉协调性差,肌肉模式改变,且左右对称性小于对照受试者(P = 0.05)。咀嚼频率未发现差异。
咬牙和咀嚼的表面肌电图分析表明,固定种植支持式义齿和种植覆盖义齿在功能上等效。咀嚼时的神经肌肉协调性低于天然牙列受试者。