• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

里夫斯技术用于原发性较大腹股沟疝修补术:1000例修补术的前瞻性研究。

Rives Technique for the Primary Larger Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Prospective Study of 1000 Repairs.

作者信息

Grau-Talens Enrique J, Ibáñez Carlos D, Motos-Micó Jacob, García-Olives Francisco, Arribas-Jurado Martina, Jordán-Chaves Carlos, Aparicio-Gallego José M, Salgado José F

机构信息

Hospital Siberia-Serena, Carretera Talarrubias-Agudo, SN, 06640, Talarrubias, Badajoz, Spain.

, Calle Castillo 15, 06006, Zalamea de la Serena, Badajoz, Spain.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2017 Oct;41(10):2480-2487. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4038-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-017-4038-z
PMID:28484818
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5596037/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We report a prospective study of repairs using the Rives technique of the more difficult primary inguinal hernias, focusing on the immediate post-operative period, clinical recurrence, testicular atrophy, and chronic pain. A mesh placed in the preperitoneal space can reduce recurrences and chronic pain.

METHODS

For the larger primary inguinal hernias (Types 3, 4, 6, and some 7), we favour preperitoneal placement of a mesh, covering the myopectineal orifice by means of a transinguinal (Rives technique) approach. The Rives technique was performed on 943 patients (1000 repairs), preferably under local anaesthesia plus sedation in ambulatory surgery.

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 31.8 min. Pain assessment after 24 h with an Andersen scale and a categorical scale gave two patients with intense pain on the Andersen scale, and four patients who thought their state was bad. Surgical wound complications were below 1%, and urinary retention was 1.2% mostly associated with spinal anaesthesia and, in one case, bladder perforation. There was spermatic cord and testicular oedema with some degree of orchitis in 17 patients. The clinical follow-up of 849 repairs (86.4%), mean (range) 30.0 (12-192) months, gave five recurrences (0.6%), three cases (0.4%) of testicular atrophy, and 37 (4.3%) of post-operative chronic pain (8 patients with visual analogue scale of 3-10).

CONCLUSIONS

The Rives technique requires a sound knowledge of inguinal preperitoneal space anatomy, but it is an excellent technique for the larger and difficult primary inguinal hernias, giving a low rate of recurrences and chronic pain.

摘要

目的

我们报告一项对采用里夫斯技术修复较复杂原发性腹股沟疝的前瞻性研究,重点关注术后即刻、临床复发、睾丸萎缩和慢性疼痛。置于腹膜前间隙的补片可减少复发和慢性疼痛。

方法

对于较大的原发性腹股沟疝(3型、4型、6型及部分7型),我们倾向于通过经腹股沟(里夫斯技术)入路在腹膜前放置补片,覆盖肌耻骨孔。对943例患者(1000次修补)实施了里夫斯技术,最好在门诊手术中采用局部麻醉加镇静。

结果

平均手术时间为31.8分钟。术后24小时采用安徒生量表和分类量表进行疼痛评估,安徒生量表显示有2例患者疼痛剧烈,4例患者认为自己状态不佳。手术伤口并发症低于1%,尿潴留为1.2%,大多与脊髓麻醉有关,1例与膀胱穿孔有关。17例患者出现精索和睾丸水肿并伴有一定程度的睾丸炎。对849次修补(86.4%)进行了平均(范围)30.0(12 - 192)个月的临床随访,发现5例复发(0.6%),3例(0.4%)睾丸萎缩,37例(4.3%)术后慢性疼痛(8例视觉模拟量表评分为3 - 10)。

结论

里夫斯技术需要对腹股沟腹膜前间隙解剖有扎实的了解,但对于较大且复杂的原发性腹股沟疝而言,它是一项出色的技术,复发率和慢性疼痛发生率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/8c47f82265e8/268_2017_4038_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/ee208213e1c5/268_2017_4038_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/9a1255a081b9/268_2017_4038_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/9f444f97e02e/268_2017_4038_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/775572250d7a/268_2017_4038_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/fa56dedd0ad9/268_2017_4038_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/2b3410952d88/268_2017_4038_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/3b6682dc7b47/268_2017_4038_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/abacb2913b10/268_2017_4038_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/8c47f82265e8/268_2017_4038_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/ee208213e1c5/268_2017_4038_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/9a1255a081b9/268_2017_4038_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/9f444f97e02e/268_2017_4038_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/775572250d7a/268_2017_4038_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/fa56dedd0ad9/268_2017_4038_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/2b3410952d88/268_2017_4038_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/3b6682dc7b47/268_2017_4038_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/abacb2913b10/268_2017_4038_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6575/5596037/8c47f82265e8/268_2017_4038_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Rives Technique for the Primary Larger Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Prospective Study of 1000 Repairs.里夫斯技术用于原发性较大腹股沟疝修补术:1000例修补术的前瞻性研究。
World J Surg. 2017 Oct;41(10):2480-2487. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4038-z.
2
The transinguinal preperitoneal technique (TIPP) in inguinal hernia repair does not cause less chronic pain in relation to the ProGrip technique: a prospective double-blind randomized clinical trial comparing the TIPP technique, using the PolySoft mesh, with the ProGrip self-fixing semi-resorbable mesh.腹股沟疝修补术中的经腹股沟腹膜前技术(TIPP)与ProGrip技术相比,并不会减少慢性疼痛:一项前瞻性双盲随机临床试验,比较了使用PolySoft补片的TIPP技术与ProGrip自固定半可吸收补片。
Hernia. 2017 Feb;21(1):17-27. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1522-6. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
3
Self-adhesive mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Experience of a single center.用于李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的自粘补片。单中心经验。
Minerva Chir. 2014 Jun;69(3):167-76. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
4
A comparative study of Desarda's technique with Lichtenstein mesh repair in treatment of inguinal hernia: A prospective cohort study.德斯尔达技术与利希滕斯坦网片修补治疗腹股沟疝的对比研究:前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2017 Mar;39:150-155. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.01.083. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
5
Low recurrence rate and low chronic pain associated with inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopic placement of Parietex ProGrip™ mesh: clinical outcomes of 220 hernias with mean follow-up at 23 months.腹腔镜放置 Parietex ProGrip™ 网片治疗腹股沟疝的低复发率和低慢性疼痛:220 例疝平均随访 23 个月的临床结果。
Hernia. 2013 Jun;17(3):313-20. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1053-3. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
6
The use of self-gripping (Progrip™) mesh during laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair: a prospective feasibility and long-term outcomes study.腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)腹股沟疝修补术中使用自固定(Progrip™)补片:一项前瞻性可行性及长期疗效研究。
Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep;29(9):2690-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3991-y. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
7
Open preperitoneal mesh repair of inguinal hernias using a mesh with nitinol memory frame.使用具有记忆合金框架的网片行开放式腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术。
Hernia. 2013 Jun;17(3):365-71. doi: 10.1007/s10029-013-1110-y. Epub 2013 May 21.
8
Long-term outcome for open preperitoneal mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia.开放式腹膜前补片修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的长期疗效。
Int J Surg. 2015 Jul;19:134-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.029. Epub 2015 May 26.
9
Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial for anterior inguinal hernia repair: transrectus sheath preperitoneal mesh repair compared to transinguinal preperitoneal procedure.随机对照试验研究方案:腹横筋膜前入路腹膜前补片修补术与经腹股沟腹膜前入路修补术治疗腹股沟前疝的比较。
Trials. 2013 Mar 3;14:65. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-65.
10
Factors predicting chronic pain after open mesh based inguinal hernia repair: ​A prospective cohort study.预测开放式网片腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2016 May;29:165-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.061. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
RETention of urine After INguinal hernia Elective Repair (RETAINER study I and II).腹股沟疝择期修补术后尿潴留(RETAINER研究I和II)
Int J Surg Protoc. 2021 Apr 23;25(1):42-54. doi: 10.29337/ijsp.137.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized clinical trial of chronic pain after the transinguinal preperitoneal technique compared with Lichtenstein's method for inguinal hernia repair.经 Transinguinal 腹膜前技术与 Lichtenstein 法治疗腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的随机临床试验比较。
Br J Surg. 2012 Oct;99(10):1365-73. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8862.
2
Randomized clinical trial of total extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty vs Lichtenstein repair: a long-term follow-up study.完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的随机临床试验:一项长期随访研究
Arch Surg. 2012 Mar;147(3):256-60. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.2023.
3
International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery.
国际腹股沟疝手术后慢性疼痛预防和管理指南。
Hernia. 2011 Jun;15(3):239-49. doi: 10.1007/s10029-011-0798-9. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
4
The characteristics of inguinal hernia recurrence in the modern era and the long-term outcomes after re-operation.现代时代腹股沟疝复发的特点和再次手术后的长期结果。
Hernia. 2011 Apr;15(2):193-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0771-z. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
5
The transinguinal preperitoneal hernia correction vs Lichtenstein's technique; is TIPP top?经腹腹膜前疝修补术与李金斯坦技术的比较;TIPP 是否最优?
Hernia. 2011 Feb;15(1):19-22. doi: 10.1007/s10029-010-0744-2.
6
European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients.欧洲疝学会关于成人腹股沟疝治疗的指南。
Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):343-403. doi: 10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
7
Transinguinal preperitoneal repair with the Polysoft patch: prospective evaluation of recurrence and chronic pain.使用Polysoft补片经腹股沟腹膜前修补术:复发和慢性疼痛的前瞻性评估
Hernia. 2008 Feb;12(1):51-6. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0278-4. Epub 2007 Sep 7.
8
Risk factors for long-term pain after hernia surgery.疝气手术后长期疼痛的风险因素。
Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):212-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000218081.53940.01.
9
Prophylactic ilioinguinal neurectomy in open inguinal hernia repair: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.开放性腹股沟疝修补术中预防性髂腹股沟神经切除术:一项双盲随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2006 Jul;244(1):27-33. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217691.81562.7e.
10
Surgical anatomy of the inguinal region based upon a study of 500 body-halves.基于对500个半侧身体的研究的腹股沟区手术解剖学。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1960 Dec;111:707-25.