Vasan Akhila, Ingham Steven C, Ingham Barbara H
1 Department of Food Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1605 Linden Drive, Madison, Wisconsin 53706; and.
2 Division of Food and Recreational Safety, Wisconsin Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection, P.O. Box 8911, Madison, Wisconsin 53708, USA.
J Food Prot. 2017 Jun;80(6):1002-1008. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-335.
Thermal tolerance of pathogenic bacteria has been shown to increase after exposure to sublethal elevated temperatures, or heat shock. We evaluated the effect of heat shock at 48°C on thermal tolerance (D) of cocktails of O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) and Salmonella in lean ground beef with or without moisture-enhancing ingredients. Beef was moisture enhanced to 110% (w) with a 5% NaCl-2.5% sodium tripolyphosphate (w/w) brine. Meat, with or without added brine, was inoculated (∼10 CFU/g) and heat shocked at 48°C for 0, 5, or 30 min, followed by isothermal heating at 55°C. Inoculated control samples were unenhanced and were not subject to heat shock. From the linear portion of the log CFU per gram surviving cells over time plots, D-values (minutes) were calculated. D was 20.43, 28.78, and 21.15 min for O157, non-O157, and Salmonella controls, respectively. Overall, heat shock significantly increased D, regardless of pathogen (P < 0.05). After 30 min of heat shock, D increased 89 and 160% for O157 STEC, 32 and 49% for non-O157 STEC, and 29 and 57% for Salmonella, in unenhanced and enhanced samples, respectively, relative to the pathogen control. D for Salmonella was the same or significantly less than for O157 and non-O157 STEC, regardless of heat shock, and was significantly less than for O157 and non-O157 STEC in all trials with moisture-enhanced meat (P < 0.05). Moisture-enhancing ingredients significantly increased D, regardless of pathogen (P < 0.05). We suggest that thermal processes validated against Salmonella may not prove effective against STEC in all cases and that regulators of the beef industry should focus attention on STEC in nonintact moisture-enhanced beef products.
已表明,致病性细菌在暴露于亚致死高温或热激后,其耐热性会增强。我们评估了48°C热激对添加或未添加保水成分的瘦牛肉馅中O157和非O157产志贺毒素大肠杆菌(STEC)以及沙门氏菌混合菌耐热性(D值)的影响。用含5%氯化钠 - 2.5%三聚磷酸钠(w/w)的盐水将牛肉的含水量提高到110%(w)。添加或未添加盐水的肉接种(约10 CFU/g)后,在48°C热激0、5或30分钟,然后在55°C等温加热。接种的对照样品未添加保水剂且未进行热激处理。根据每克存活细胞的对数CFU随时间变化图的线性部分计算D值(分钟)。O157、非O157和沙门氏菌对照的D值分别为20.43、28.78和21.15分钟。总体而言,无论病原体如何,热激均显著提高了D值(P < 0.05)。热激30分钟后,相对于病原体对照,未添加保水剂和添加保水剂的样品中,O157 STEC的D值分别增加了89%和160%,非O157 STEC的D值分别增加了32%和49%,沙门氏菌的D值分别增加了29%和57%。无论是否热激,沙门氏菌的D值与O157和非O157 STEC相同或显著更低,并且在所有添加保水剂的肉类试验中,其D值均显著低于O157和非O157 STEC(P < 0.05)。无论病原体如何,保水成分均显著提高了D值(P < 0.05)。我们认为,针对沙门氏菌验证的热处理方法在所有情况下可能对STEC并不有效,牛肉行业的监管机构应关注非完整的添加保水剂牛肉产品中的STEC。