Suppr超能文献

对比乳酸浸泡与乳酸喷雾在减少牛肉切块和绞碎牛肉中大肠杆菌 O157:H7、沙门氏菌和非 O157 型志贺毒素大肠杆菌的效果的验证。

Validation comparing the effectiveness of a lactic acid dip with a lactic acid spray for reducing Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and non-O157 Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli on beef trim and ground beef.

机构信息

Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.

出版信息

J Food Prot. 2012 Nov;75(11):1968-73. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-12-038.

Abstract

The objective of this research was to compare the effectiveness of two application methods (dip versus spray) of 4.4% lactic acid for reducing pathogens on inoculated beef trim and in ground beef. Beef trim inoculated with cocktail mixtures of E. coli O157:H7, non-O157 Shiga toxigenic E. coli (STEC), or Salmonella (10(5) to 10(6) CFU/g) at separate times was subjected to five treatments: lactic acid spray (LS), lactic acid dip (LD), water spray (WS), water dip (WD), and untreated control (CTL). Intervention effectiveness for pathogen reduction was measured at 1 and 20 h after treatment on beef trim. Trim was then ground and intervention effectiveness was measured 1 h, 24 h, 72 h, and 7 days after grinding. The LD treatment reduced all pathogens significantly (P < 0.05); E. coli O157:H7 was reduced by 0.91 to 1.41 log CFU/g on beef trim and ground beef, non-O157 STEC by 0.48 to 0.82 log CFU/g, and Salmonella by 0.51 to 0.81 log CFU/g. No other treatment significantly reduced any pathogen, although the WD treatment noticeably reduced (P > 0.05) both E. coli O157:H7 and non-O157 STEC populations compared with the CTL. The LS treatment reduced E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella by up to 0.5 log CFU/g on beef trim, but these reduced counts did not significantly differ (P > 0.05) from the CTL counts. Overall, the LD treatment was most effective for reducing all pathogens and is the best of these options for improving the safety of beef trim and subsequently produced ground beef.

摘要

本研究旨在比较两种 4.4%乳酸应用方法(浸泡与喷雾)对减少接种牛肉修剪物和绞碎牛肉中病原体的效果。将鸡尾酒混合物(大肠杆菌 O157:H7、非 O157 志贺毒素产生型大肠杆菌(STEC)或沙门氏菌)分别接种于牛肉修剪物,接种浓度为 10(5) 至 10(6) CFU/g,随后进行 5 种处理:乳酸喷雾(LS)、乳酸浸泡(LD)、水喷雾(WS)、水浸泡(WD)和未处理对照(CTL)。处理后 1 和 20 小时分别对牛肉修剪物上的病原体减少情况进行干预效果评估。修剪物随后被绞碎,在绞碎后 1 小时、24 小时、72 小时和 7 天再次进行干预效果评估。LD 处理显著降低了所有病原体(P < 0.05);在牛肉修剪物和绞碎牛肉中,大肠杆菌 O157:H7 减少了 0.91 至 1.41 log CFU/g,非 O157 STEC 减少了 0.48 至 0.82 log CFU/g,沙门氏菌减少了 0.51 至 0.81 log CFU/g。其他处理方法并未显著降低任何病原体,但 WD 处理与 CTL 相比,显著降低了(P > 0.05)大肠杆菌 O157:H7 和非 O157 STEC 数量。LS 处理在牛肉修剪物上最多可减少 0.5 log CFU/g 的大肠杆菌 O157:H7 和沙门氏菌,但这些减少的数量与 CTL 数量相比没有显著差异(P > 0.05)。总体而言,LD 处理对减少所有病原体最有效,是改善牛肉修剪物和随后生产的绞碎牛肉安全性的最佳选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验