文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

膜翅目毒液过敏的组分分辨体外诊断与基于提取物的体外诊断的诊断准确性:对临床管理的影响。

Diagnostic precision of component-resolved vs. extract-based in vitro diagnosis of hymenoptera venom allergy: effects on clinical management.

作者信息

Seyfarth Florian, Miguel Diana, Schliemann Sibylle, Hipler Uta-Christina

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

Dermatology Practice PD Dr. med. habil. K. Jung, Uta Zell, Erfurt.

出版信息

J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2017 May;15(5):507-515. doi: 10.1111/ddg.13240.


DOI:10.1111/ddg.13240
PMID:28485877
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The measurement of specific IgE (sIgE) antibodies plays a key role in the diagnosis of honeybee and wasp venom allergy. In recent years, component-resolved diagnosis (CRD) has been introduced, which allows for the measurement of sIgE antibodies against Api m 1, Ves v 1, Ves v 5, and Pol d 5, as well as cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs). These tests are intended to help determine the clinical relevance of any given sensitization, especially in patients with dual sensitization. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Specific IgE antibody levels were measured in 143 patients with bee and/or wasp venom allergy using the extract-based ImmunoCAP allergens i1 and i3 as well as the ImmunoCAP allergen components i208-211 and O214 (Api m 1, Ves v 1, Ves v 5, Pol d 5, CCDs). In patients with dual sensitization, inhibition testing was also performed. In a subgroup of the study population, sIgE to Api m 1, Api m 4, Pol d 5, and Ves v 5 were determined using the ISAC allergy microarray (n = 44). RESULTS: The sensitivity of Ves v 5 in patients with isolated wasp venom allergy was 78.5 %; in combination with Ves v 1, that figure increased to 92.3 %. The sensitivity of Api m 1 in individuals with isolated bee venom allergy was 25 %. CRD and inhibition testing in individuals with dual sensitization showed divergent results. CRD using the ISAC allergy microarray showed marked differences, especially with regard to Api m 1 and CCDs. CONCLUSION: Component-resolved tests are a valuable addition to the diagnostic spectrum as long as they are used in combination with established procedures. Apart from Ves v 5, measuring IgE antibodies to Ves v 1 should always be included in the diagnostic workup.

摘要

背景:特异性IgE(sIgE)抗体的检测在蜜蜂和黄蜂毒液过敏的诊断中起着关键作用。近年来,已引入成分分辨诊断(CRD),它能够检测针对Api m 1、Ves v 1、Ves v 5和Pol d 5以及交叉反应性碳水化合物决定簇(CCD)的sIgE抗体。这些检测旨在帮助确定任何给定致敏反应的临床相关性,尤其是在双重致敏的患者中。 患者与方法:使用基于提取物的ImmunoCAP过敏原i1和i3以及ImmunoCAP过敏原成分i208 - 211和O214(Api m 1、Ves v 1、Ves v 5、Pol d 5、CCD),对143例蜜蜂和/或黄蜂毒液过敏患者进行特异性IgE抗体水平检测。对双重致敏的患者还进行了抑制试验。在研究人群的一个亚组中,使用ISAC过敏微阵列测定了对Api m 1、Api m 4、Pol d 5和Ves v 5的sIgE(n = 44)。 结果:孤立性黄蜂毒液过敏患者中Ves v 5的敏感性为78.5%;与Ves v 1联合时,该数字增至92.3%。孤立性蜜蜂毒液过敏个体中Api m 1的敏感性为25%。双重致敏个体的CRD和抑制试验结果存在差异。使用ISAC过敏微阵列的CRD显示出明显差异,尤其是在Api m 1和CCD方面。 结论:只要将成分分辨检测与既定程序结合使用,它们就是诊断方法的有价值补充。除了Ves v 5外,诊断检查中始终应包括检测针对Ves v 1的IgE抗体。

相似文献

[1]
Diagnostic precision of component-resolved vs. extract-based in vitro diagnosis of hymenoptera venom allergy: effects on clinical management.

J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2017-5

[2]
IgE to recombinant allergens Api m 1, Ves v 1, and Ves v 5 distinguish double sensitization from crossreaction in venom allergy.

Allergy. 2012-6-8

[3]
Value of component based diagnostics in IgE-mediated hymenoptera sting reactions.

Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2012-6

[4]
Hymenoptera venom allergy: analysis of double positivity to honey bee and Vespula venom by estimation of IgE antibodies to species-specific major allergens Api m1 and Ves v5.

Allergy. 2009-4

[5]
Component resolution reveals additional major allergens in patients with honeybee venom allergy.

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014-1-17

[6]
Improved recombinant Api m 1- and Ves v 5-based IgE testing to dissect bee and yellow jacket allergy and their correlation with the severity of the sting reaction.

Clin Exp Allergy. 2016-4

[7]
Individual hymenoptera venom compounds induce upregulation of the basophil activation marker ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase/phosphodiesterase 3 (CD203c) in sensitized patients.

Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2002-10

[8]
Component Resolved Diagnosis in Hymenoptera Anaphylaxis.

Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2017-6

[9]
Component-resolved diagnosis of wasp (yellow jacket) venom allergy.

Clin Exp Allergy. 2013-2

[10]
Basophil Activation Test in Double-Sensitized Patients With Hymenoptera Venom Allergy: Additional Benefit of Component-Resolved Diagnostics.

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023-9

引用本文的文献

[1]
Component-Resolved and Multiplex-Specific IgE Diagnostics: Utility in Anaphylaxis and Beyond.

Children (Basel). 2025-7-16

[2]
Wasp Venom Biochemical Components and Their Potential in Biological Applications and Nanotechnological Interventions.

Toxins (Basel). 2021-3-12

[3]
WHO/IUIS Allergen Nomenclature: Providing a common language.

Mol Immunol. 2018-4-4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索