Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Department of Immunology, Allergology, Rheumatology, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerpen, Belgium.
Clin Exp Allergy. 2013 Feb;43(2):255-61. doi: 10.1111/cea.12057.
Wasp venom allergy is a potentially life-threatening condition with serious consequences of diagnostic error.
To assess whether component-resolved diagnosis, using non-glycosylated recombinant allergen components from yellow jacket can add to the diagnosis of wasp venom allergy.
In total, 148 patients with a wasp (yellow jacket) allergy were included, 91 with unequivocal tests, 26 with double positivity of serum-specific IgE (sIgE) to both venoms, 21 with discrepant sIgE and skin test results and finally 10 having their diagnosis only confirmed by basophil activation test (negative sIgE and skin test results). Specific IgE to recombinant species-specific allergen components Ves v 1 and Ves v 5 from yellow jacket, Api m 1 from honeybee and Ves v 5 complemented wasp venom were tested by ImmunoCAP.
Overall, combined use of sIgE to rVes v 1 and rVes v 5 allowed correct diagnosis in 139 of the 148 patients (94%) and rApi m 1 was demonstrable in only one patient. Supplementing the traditional yellow jacket allergosorbent with rVes v 5 allowed to correctly diagnose wasp allergy in patients sensitized to Ves v 5 but demonstrating a negative sIgE to wasp venom.
Component-resolved diagnoses with the wasp-specific recombinant allergen components Ves v 1 and Ves v 5 is a reliable method to diagnose yellow jacket allergy and can help to take out the sting of difficult cases. However, as the number of patients with doubt after conventional tests is small, larger collaborative studies are needed to draw more definitive conclusions. Whether the rVes v 5 supplemented yellow jacket allergosorbent constitutes an asset in the diagnostic management of wasp venom allergy remains to be further established.
黄蜂毒液过敏是一种具有潜在生命威胁的疾病,如果诊断错误,可能会产生严重后果。
评估使用非糖基化重组黄蜂过敏原成分进行组分分辨诊断是否可以辅助黄蜂毒液过敏的诊断。
共纳入 148 例黄蜂(黄夹克)过敏患者,91 例有明确的测试结果,26 例血清特异性 IgE(sIgE)对两种毒液均呈双阳性,21 例 sIgE 和皮肤试验结果不一致,最后 10 例患者仅通过嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验(阴性 sIgE 和皮肤试验结果)确诊。采用 ImmunoCAP 检测重组种特异性过敏原成分 Ves v 1 和 Ves v 5 以及来自蜜蜂的 Api m 1 和补充黄蜂毒液的 Ves v 5 的特异性 IgE。
总体而言,rVes v 1 和 rVes v 5 的 sIgE 联合使用可正确诊断 148 例患者中的 139 例(94%),仅在 1 例患者中检测到 rApi m 1。补充 rVes v 5 后,传统的黄蜂过敏原吸附剂可正确诊断对 Ves v 5 过敏但对黄蜂毒液 sIgE 阴性的患者。
使用黄蜂特异性重组过敏原成分 Ves v 1 和 Ves v 5 进行组分分辨诊断是诊断黄蜂过敏的可靠方法,可以帮助解决疑难病例。然而,由于常规测试后存在疑问的患者数量较少,需要更大规模的协作研究来得出更明确的结论。rVes v 5 补充的黄蜂过敏原吸附剂是否在黄蜂毒液过敏的诊断管理中具有优势仍有待进一步确定。