• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

虚假供述。

False confessions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017 Nov;8(6). doi: 10.1002/wcs.1439. Epub 2017 May 9.

DOI:10.1002/wcs.1439
PMID:28485886
Abstract

As illustrated by numerous cases in recent years, DNA exonerations of innocent individuals have cast a spotlight on the counterintuitive problem of false confessions. Studying the underlying psychology scientists have found that (1) innocent people are often targeted for interrogation because police make erroneous but confident judgments of deception; (2) certain interrogation techniques-namely, lengthy sessions, presentations of false evidence, and minimization themes that imply leniency-increase the risk that innocent people will confess; (3) certain individuals are particularly vulnerable to influence-notably, those with mental health problems or intellectual impairments, which render them overly compliant or suggestible, and children and adolescents, who exhibit 'immaturity of judgment'; (4) confession evidence is highly persuasive in court as a matter of common sense, increasing perceptions of guilt, even among judges and juries who see the confession as coerced, and even at times when the confession is contradicted by exculpatory information; (5) Miranda rights to silence and to counsel are not sufficiently protective, so proposals for reform have centered on the mandatory recording of interrogations, from start to finish, and a shift toward using investigative interviewing-a less confrontational, less deceptive means of questioning suspects. WIREs Cogn Sci 2017, 8:e1439. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1439 For further resources related to this article, please visit the WIREs website.

摘要

近年来有许多案例表明,对无辜个体的 DNA 无罪洗脱凸显了一个违背直觉的错误认罪问题。科学家通过研究其潜在心理发现:(1)无辜者经常成为审讯对象,因为警方会错误但自信地判断欺骗行为;(2)某些审讯技术——即长时间审讯、呈现虚假证据、以及暗示宽大处理的主题——会增加无辜者认罪的风险;(3)某些人特别容易受到影响——特别是那些有心理健康问题或智力障碍的人,他们表现出过度顺从或易受暗示,以及儿童和青少年,他们表现出“判断力不成熟”;(4)供词证据在法庭上极具说服力,这是常识,即使是看到供词是被迫的法官和陪审团也会增加对有罪的看法,即使在供词与开脱罪责的信息相矛盾的情况下也是如此;(5)米兰达沉默权和律师权保护不足,因此改革提案集中在从始至终强制记录审讯,以及转向使用调查性访谈——一种不那么对抗性、不那么欺骗性的讯问嫌疑人的方式。WIREs Cogn Sci 2017, 8:e1439. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1439 如需了解本文相关资源,请访问 WIREs 网站。

相似文献

1
False confessions.虚假供述。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017 Nov;8(6). doi: 10.1002/wcs.1439. Epub 2017 May 9.
2
The Psychology of Confessions: A Review of the Literature and Issues.《供认的心理学:文献回顾与问题探讨》。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2004 Nov;5(2):33-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00016.x. Epub 2004 Nov 1.
3
Police-induced confessions: risk factors and recommendations.警察诱导的口供:风险因素与建议。
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):3-38. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
4
On the psychology of confessions: does innocence put innocents at risk?论供述心理:无罪是否会让无辜者陷入危险?
Am Psychol. 2005 Apr;60(3):215-28. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.3.215.
5
On the general acceptance of confessions research: Opinions of the scientific community.关于口供研究的普遍接受:科学界的观点。
Am Psychol. 2018 Jan;73(1):63-80. doi: 10.1037/amp0000141.
6
What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions?潜在陪审员对警方的审讯技巧和虚假供词了解多少?
Behav Sci Law. 2009 May-Jun;27(3):381-99. doi: 10.1002/bsl.872.
7
Revisiting the False Confession Problem.重新审视虚假供述问题。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2018 Mar;46(1):34-44.
8
Police tactics and guilt status uniquely influence suspects' physiologic reactivity and resistance to confess.警察策略和犯罪嫌疑状态会独特地影响嫌疑人的生理反应和抗拒供认的能力。
Law Hum Behav. 2018 Dec;42(6):497-506. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000306. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
9
False confessions: How can psychology so basic be so counterintuitive?虚假口供:如此基础的心理学怎么会如此违反直觉?
Am Psychol. 2017 Dec;72(9):951-964. doi: 10.1037/amp0000195.
10
High-risk interrogation: using the "Mr. Big Technique" to elicit confessions.高危审讯:使用“大先生技巧”获取口供。
Law Hum Behav. 2010 Feb;34(1):39-40. doi: 10.1007/s10979-009-9203-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Unmaking a murderer: behaviour sequence analysis of false confessions.拆解一名“凶手”:虚假供述的行为序列分析
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 May 31;25(3):425-436. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1463875. eCollection 2018.