Ruijsbroek Annemarie, Wong Albert, Kunst Anton E, van den Brink Carolien, van Oers Hans A M, Droomers Mariël, Stronks Karien
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0177262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177262. eCollection 2017.
Large-scale regeneration programmes to improve the personal conditions and living circumstances in deprived areas may affect health and the lifestyle of the residents. Previous evaluations concluded that a large-scale urban regeneration programme in the Netherlands had some positive effects within 3.5 years. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects at the longer run.
With a quasi-experimental research design we assessed changes in the prevalence of general health, mental health, physical activity, overweight, obesity, and smoking between the pre-intervention (2003-04 -mid 2008) and intervention period (mid 2008-2013-14) in 40 deprived target districts and comparably deprived control districts. We used the Difference-in-Difference (DiD) to assess programme impact. Additionally, we stratified analyses by sex and by the intensity of the regeneration programme.
Changes in health and health related behaviours from pre-intervention to the intervention period were about equally large in the target districts as in control districts. DiD impact estimates were inconsistent and not statistically significant. Sex differences in DiD estimates were not consistent or significant. Furthermore, DiD impact estimates were not consistently larger in target districts with more intensive intervention programmes.
We found no evidence that this Dutch urban regeneration programme had an impact in the longer run on self-reported health and related behaviour at the area level.
旨在改善贫困地区个人条件和生活环境的大规模重建项目可能会影响居民的健康和生活方式。先前的评估得出结论,荷兰的一个大规模城市重建项目在3.5年内产生了一些积极影响。本研究的目的是评估长期效果。
采用准实验研究设计,我们评估了40个贫困目标地区和类似贫困对照地区在干预前(2003 - 2004年至2008年年中)和干预期(2008年年中至2013 - 2014年)之间一般健康、心理健康、身体活动、超重、肥胖和吸烟患病率的变化。我们使用差异中的差异(DiD)来评估项目影响。此外,我们按性别和重建项目的强度进行了分层分析。
从干预前到干预期,目标地区健康及与健康相关行为的变化与对照地区大致相同。DiD影响估计不一致且无统计学意义。DiD估计中的性别差异也不一致且不显著。此外,在干预项目更密集的目标地区,DiD影响估计并非始终更大。
我们没有发现证据表明该荷兰城市重建项目对地区层面自我报告的健康及相关行为有长期影响。