• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The impact of urban regeneration programmes on health and health-related behaviour: Evaluation of the Dutch District Approach 6.5 years from the start.城市更新项目对健康及与健康相关行为的影响:荷兰地区方法启动6.5年后的评估。
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0177262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177262. eCollection 2017.
2
Impact of a Dutch urban regeneration programme on mental health trends: a quasi-experimental study.荷兰城市更新项目对心理健康趋势的影响:一项准实验研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Oct;70(10):967-73. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-207016. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
3
Is it better to invest in place or people to maximize population health? Evaluation of the general health impact of urban regeneration in Dutch deprived neighbourhoods.为使人口健康最大化,投资场所还是投资于人更好?对荷兰贫困社区城市更新的总体健康影响评估。
Health Place. 2016 Sep;41:50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
4
Are area-based initiatives able to improve area safety in deprived areas? A quasi-experimental evaluation of the Dutch District Approach.基于区域的举措能否改善贫困地区的区域安全状况?荷兰地区方法的准实验评估。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 28;15:711. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2027-4.
5
The impact of area-based initiatives on physical activity trends in deprived areas; a quasi-experimental evaluation of the Dutch District Approach.基于区域的举措对贫困地区体力活动趋势的影响;荷兰地区方法的准实验评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Mar 11;11(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-36.
6
Do inhabitants profit from integrating a public health focus in urban renewal programmes? A Dutch case study.居民是否从将公共卫生重点纳入城市更新计划中获益?荷兰的一项案例研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0270367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270367. eCollection 2022.
7
Regeneration of deprived neighbourhoods and indicators of functioning in older adults: A quasi-experimental evaluation of the Dutch District Approach.贫困社区的复兴与老年人的功能指标:荷兰地区方法的准实验评估
Health Place. 2020 Jul;64:102359. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102359. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
8
The impact of intervening in green space in Dutch deprived neighbourhoods on physical activity and general health: results from the quasi-experimental URBAN40 study.在荷兰贫困社区干预绿色空间对身体活动和总体健康的影响:来自准实验 URBAN40 研究的结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Feb;70(2):147-54. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-205210. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
9
Does selective migration bias the health impact assessment of urban regeneration programmes in cross-sectional studies? Findings from a Dutch case study.选择性迁移是否会影响城市再生计划健康影响评估的横断面研究?来自荷兰案例研究的结果。
Health Place. 2019 Jan;55:155-164. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Built environment stakeholders' experiences of implementing healthy urban development: an exploratory study.建筑环境利益相关者实施健康城市发展的经验:一项探索性研究。
Cities Health. 2022 Sep 3;6(5):922-936. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2021.1876376. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
2
Neighborhood Poverty and Clinic Attendance in the Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health Through Telemedicine Program.密歇根州通过远程医疗项目进行青光眼及眼部健康筛查与干预中的邻里贫困与诊所就诊情况
J Glaucoma. 2025 Jan 1;34(1):30-38. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002463. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
3
Short-term health effects of an urban regeneration programme in deprived neighbourhoods of Barcelona.巴塞罗那贫困社区城市更新计划的短期健康影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 17;19(4):e0300470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300470. eCollection 2024.
4
Do inhabitants profit from integrating a public health focus in urban renewal programmes? A Dutch case study.居民是否从将公共卫生重点纳入城市更新计划中获益?荷兰的一项案例研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 24;17(6):e0270367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270367. eCollection 2022.
5
The Regeneración Urbana, Calidad de Vida y Salud - RUCAS project: a Chilean multi-methods study to evaluate the impact of urban regeneration on resident health and wellbeing.城市再生、生活质量与健康 - RUCAS 项目:一项智利多方法研究,评估城市再生对居民健康和福祉的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 15;21(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10739-3.
6
Health Benefits of Physical Activity Related to an Urban Riverside Regeneration.体力活动对城市滨江再生相关的健康益处。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 5;16(3):462. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030462.

本文引用的文献

1
Is it better to invest in place or people to maximize population health? Evaluation of the general health impact of urban regeneration in Dutch deprived neighbourhoods.为使人口健康最大化,投资场所还是投资于人更好?对荷兰贫困社区城市更新的总体健康影响评估。
Health Place. 2016 Sep;41:50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.07.003. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
2
Impact of a Dutch urban regeneration programme on mental health trends: a quasi-experimental study.荷兰城市更新项目对心理健康趋势的影响:一项准实验研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016 Oct;70(10):967-73. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-207016. Epub 2016 Apr 6.
3
Health trajectories in regeneration areas in England: the impact of the New Deal for Communities intervention.英格兰再生区域的健康轨迹:社区新政干预措施的影响。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Aug;69(8):762-8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-204362. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
4
The effects of an urban renewal project on health and health inequalities: a quasi-experimental study in Barcelona.城市更新项目对健康及健康不平等的影响:巴塞罗那的一项准实验研究
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014 Sep;68(9):811-7. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203434. Epub 2014 May 6.
5
The impact of area-based initiatives on physical activity trends in deprived areas; a quasi-experimental evaluation of the Dutch District Approach.基于区域的举措对贫困地区体力活动趋势的影响;荷兰地区方法的准实验评估。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014 Mar 11;11(1):36. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-36.
6
Area-based interventions to ameliorate deprived Dutch neighborhoods in practice: does the Dutch District Approach address the social determinants of health to such an extent that future health impacts may be expected?实践中改善荷兰贫困社区的区域干预措施:荷兰地区方法在多大程度上解决了健康的社会决定因素,以至于可以预期对未来健康产生影响?
Prev Med. 2014 Apr;61:122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
7
An evaluation of an urban renewal program and its effects on neighborhood resident's overall wellbeing using concept mapping.利用概念图评估城市更新计划及其对社区居民整体福祉的影响。
Health Place. 2013 Sep;23:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 May 16.
8
Health effects of neighborhood demolition and housing improvement: a prospective controlled study of 2 natural experiments in urban renewal.社区拆迁和住房改善对健康的影响:城市更新中 2 个自然实验的前瞻性对照研究。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):e47-53. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301275. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
9
A pre-and-post study of an urban renewal program in a socially disadvantaged neighbourhood in Sydney, Australia.澳大利亚悉尼一个社会弱势群体聚居区的城市更新计划的前后研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jul 12;12:521. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-521.
10
Evaluating health impacts: Results from the neighbourhood renewal strategy [corrected] in Victoria, Australia.评估健康影响:澳大利亚维多利亚州邻里更新战略[更正]的结果。
Health Place. 2010 Sep;16(5):861-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.04.011. Epub 2010 Apr 28.

城市更新项目对健康及与健康相关行为的影响:荷兰地区方法启动6.5年后的评估。

The impact of urban regeneration programmes on health and health-related behaviour: Evaluation of the Dutch District Approach 6.5 years from the start.

作者信息

Ruijsbroek Annemarie, Wong Albert, Kunst Anton E, van den Brink Carolien, van Oers Hans A M, Droomers Mariël, Stronks Karien

机构信息

National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0177262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177262. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0177262
PMID:28486487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5423649/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Large-scale regeneration programmes to improve the personal conditions and living circumstances in deprived areas may affect health and the lifestyle of the residents. Previous evaluations concluded that a large-scale urban regeneration programme in the Netherlands had some positive effects within 3.5 years. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effects at the longer run.

METHODS

With a quasi-experimental research design we assessed changes in the prevalence of general health, mental health, physical activity, overweight, obesity, and smoking between the pre-intervention (2003-04 -mid 2008) and intervention period (mid 2008-2013-14) in 40 deprived target districts and comparably deprived control districts. We used the Difference-in-Difference (DiD) to assess programme impact. Additionally, we stratified analyses by sex and by the intensity of the regeneration programme.

RESULTS

Changes in health and health related behaviours from pre-intervention to the intervention period were about equally large in the target districts as in control districts. DiD impact estimates were inconsistent and not statistically significant. Sex differences in DiD estimates were not consistent or significant. Furthermore, DiD impact estimates were not consistently larger in target districts with more intensive intervention programmes.

CONCLUSION

We found no evidence that this Dutch urban regeneration programme had an impact in the longer run on self-reported health and related behaviour at the area level.

摘要

背景

旨在改善贫困地区个人条件和生活环境的大规模重建项目可能会影响居民的健康和生活方式。先前的评估得出结论,荷兰的一个大规模城市重建项目在3.5年内产生了一些积极影响。本研究的目的是评估长期效果。

方法

采用准实验研究设计,我们评估了40个贫困目标地区和类似贫困对照地区在干预前(2003 - 2004年至2008年年中)和干预期(2008年年中至2013 - 2014年)之间一般健康、心理健康、身体活动、超重、肥胖和吸烟患病率的变化。我们使用差异中的差异(DiD)来评估项目影响。此外,我们按性别和重建项目的强度进行了分层分析。

结果

从干预前到干预期,目标地区健康及与健康相关行为的变化与对照地区大致相同。DiD影响估计不一致且无统计学意义。DiD估计中的性别差异也不一致且不显著。此外,在干预项目更密集的目标地区,DiD影响估计并非始终更大。

结论

我们没有发现证据表明该荷兰城市重建项目对地区层面自我报告的健康及相关行为有长期影响。