Reverse Left Ventricular Remodelling in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Incidence, Predictors, and Impact on Outcome.

BACKGROUD

We investigated reverse left ventricular remodelling (r-LVR), defined as a reduction of >10% in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) during follow-up, in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).

METHODS

STEMI patients (n=1,237) undergoing PPCI with echocardiography at baseline and 6-month follow-up were classified into r-LVR (n=466) and no r-LVR groups (n=771). The primary outcome was composite major adverse cardiac events (MACE; all-cause death, myocardial infarction, any revascularisation).

RESULTS

r-LVR occurred in 466 patients (37.7%) and was associated with maximum troponin, door-to-balloon time, direct arrival to PPCI-capable hospital, coronary disease extent, initial left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and LVESV. After propensity score (PS)-matching, initial LVEF and LVESV remained significant. During a median 403-day follow-up, 2-year MACE occurred in 166 patients (13.4%); its frequency was similar between groups (entire cohort: 13.5% vs. 13.4%, p=0.247; PS-matched: 11.8% vs. 11.8%, p=0.987). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed that MACE-free survival was comparable between groups (entire cohort: 86.5% vs. 86.6%, log rank p=0.939; PS-matched: 88.2% vs. 88.2%, log rank p=0.867). In Cox proportional hazard analysis, r-LVR was not associated with MACE (entire cohort: hazard ratio [HR] 1.018, 95% confidential interval [CI] 0.675-1.534, p=0.934; PS-matched: HR 1.001, 95% CI 0.578-1.731, p=0.999).

CONCLUSION

We identified independent predictors of r-LVR and showed that while r-LVR occurred in 38% of our patients, it was not associated with clinical outcomes.