• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两切口与微创后外侧全髋关节置换术的随机临床试验:10年时差异依然存在。

Randomized Clinical Trial of 2-Incision vs Mini-Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: Differences Persist at 10 Years.

作者信息

Abdel Matthew P, Chalmers Brian P, Trousdale Robert T, Hanssen Arlen D, Pagnano Mark W

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2744-2747. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.005
PMID:28487089
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A previous randomized clinical trial at our institution demonstrated slower recovery of 35 2-incision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) when compared with 36 mini-posterior THAs at 2 years. The primary aim of the present study was to report concise 10-year follow-up results.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the 71 patients in the previous randomized clinical trial, comparing clinical outcomes, revisions, reoperations, and implant survivorship between the 2-incision and the mini-posterior THAs.

RESULTS

At the most recent follow-up, the mean Harris hip score was 85 in the 2-incision group and 87 in the mini-posterior group (P = .4). There were 4 revisions and 2 reoperations (16%) in the 2-incision group vs 1 revision and 3 reoperations (11%) in the mini-posterior group (P = .5). Ten-year survivorship free of aseptic revision or reoperation was 77% in the 2-incision group vs 90% in the mini-posterior group (P = .15).

CONCLUSION

There were no improvements in early or midterm clinical outcomes with the 2-incision technique. However, there was a clinical trend toward a higher rate of aseptic revisions in the 2-incision THA group.

摘要

背景

我们机构之前的一项随机临床试验表明,与36例小切口后路全髋关节置换术(THA)相比,35例双切口全髋关节置换术在2年时恢复较慢。本研究的主要目的是报告简明的10年随访结果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了之前随机临床试验中的71例患者,比较了双切口和小切口后路THA之间的临床结果、翻修、再次手术和植入物生存率。

结果

在最近的随访中,双切口组的平均Harris髋关节评分是85分,小切口后路组是87分(P = 0.4)。双切口组有4例翻修和2例再次手术(16%),小切口后路组有1例翻修和3例再次手术(11%)(P = 0.5)。双切口组10年无无菌性翻修或再次手术的生存率为77%,小切口后路组为90%(P = 0.15)。

结论

双切口技术在早期或中期临床结果方面没有改善。然而,双切口THA组无菌性翻修率有升高的临床趋势。

相似文献

1
Randomized Clinical Trial of 2-Incision vs Mini-Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: Differences Persist at 10 Years.两切口与微创后外侧全髋关节置换术的随机临床试验:10年时差异依然存在。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2744-2747. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
2
A Prospective Randomized Trial of Mini-Incision Posterior and 2-Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.小切口后路与双切口全髋关节置换术的前瞻性随机试验:至少5年随访
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Aug;32(8):2462-2465. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.038. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
3
Slower recovery after two-incision than mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty. A randomized clinical trial.两切口全髋关节置换术后恢复比小后外侧切口全髋关节置换术慢。一项随机临床试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):1000-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00804.
4
Slower recovery after two-incision than mini-posterior-incision total hip arthroplasty. Surgical technique.两切口全髋关节置换术后的恢复比小后外侧切口全髋关节置换术更慢。手术技术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91 Suppl 2 Pt 1:50-73. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01531.
5
Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study.后路微创与传统全髋关节置换术后的早期疼痛缓解及功能。一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jun;89(6):1153-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00940.
6
Operative and patient care techniques for posterior mini-incision total hip arthroplasty.后路小切口全髋关节置换术的手术及患者护理技术
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec;441:104-14. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000193811.23706.3a.
7
Comparison of supercapsular percutaneously assisted approach total hip versus conventional posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.经皮辅助囊上入路全髋关节置换术与传统后入路全髋关节置换术的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Sep 25;12(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0636-6.
8
[Comparison of total hip arthroplasty via a posterior mini-incision versus a classic anterolateral approach].经后外侧小切口与经典前外侧入路全髋关节置换术的比较
Orthopade. 2006 Jul;35(7):716, 718-22. doi: 10.1007/s00132-006-0963-5.
9
No benefit of the two-incision THA over mini-posterior THA: a pilot study of strength and gait.双切口全髋关节置换术与微创后外侧入路全髋关节置换术比较:一项关于力量和步态的初步研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):565-70. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0780-3. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
10
Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision.标准切口与小切口行初次全髋关节置换术的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Jul;86(7):1353-8. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200407000-00001.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship of Soft Tissue Thickness With Body Mass Index and Perioperative Factors in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.全髋关节置换术患者软组织厚度与体重指数及围手术期因素的关系:一项回顾性横断面研究
Cureus. 2025 Jan 17;17(1):e77581. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77581. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Update on Navigation, Robotics, and Contemporary Advancements.全髋关节置换术:导航、机器人技术及当代进展的最新情况
HSS J. 2023 Nov;19(4):478-485. doi: 10.1177/15563316231193704. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
3
Evaluation of Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
全髋关节置换术手术入路的比较疗效和安全性评价:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2253942. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53942.
4
Factors influencing the outcomes of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.影响微创全髋关节置换术结局的因素:系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 May 18;17(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03168-4.
5
Fragility Index as a Measure of Randomized Clinical Trial Quality in Adult Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.脆弱性指数作为成人重建随机临床试验质量的衡量指标:一项系统评价。
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Oct 11;11:239-251. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.08.018. eCollection 2021 Oct.
6
Association Between Surgical Approach and Major Surgical Complications in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty.髋关节置换术后手术入路与主要手术并发症的关系。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1070-1076. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0785.
7
Total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery or not? Meta-analysis of clinical trials.全髋关节置换术:微创还是非微创?临床试验的荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2019 Jul;43(7):1573-1582. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4124-3. Epub 2018 Aug 31.