Giesen Marie-Jeanne, Keizer Ellen, van de Pol Julia, Knoben Joris, Wensing Michel, Giesen Paul
Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
TiasNimbas Business School, Tilburg University, Tilburg, the Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2017 May 9;7(5):e014605. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014605.
To explore the potential impact of demand management strategies on patient decision-making in medically non-urgent and urgent scenarios during out-of-hours for children between the ages of 0 and 4 years.
We conducted a cross-sectional survey with paper-based case scenarios. A survey was sent to all 797 parents of children aged between 0 and 4 years from four Dutch general practitioner (GP) practices. Four demand management strategies (copayment, online advice, overview medical cost and GP appointment next morning) were incorporated in two medically non-urgent and two urgent case scenarios. Combining the case scenarios with the demand management strategies resulted in 16 cases (four scenarios each with four demand management strategies). Each parent randomly received a questionnaire with three different case scenarios with three different demand strategies and a baseline case scenario without a demand management strategy.
The response rate was 47.4%. The strategy online advice led to more medically appropriate decision-making for both non-urgent case scenarios (OR 0.26; CI 0.11 to 0.58) and urgent case scenarios (OR 0.16; CI 0.08 to 0.32). Overview of medical cost (OR 0.59; CI 0.38 to 0.92) and a GP appointment planned the next morning (OR 0.57; CI 0.34 to 0.97) had some influence on patient decisions for urgent cases, but not for non-urgent cases. Copayment had no influence on patient decisions.
Online advice has the highest potential to reduce medically unnecessary use. Furthermore it enhanced safety of parents' decisions on seeking help for their young children during out-of-hours primary care. Valid online information on health symptoms for patients should be promoted.
探讨需求管理策略对0至4岁儿童非工作时间医疗非紧急和紧急情况下患者决策的潜在影响。
我们采用纸质病例情景进行了一项横断面调查。向荷兰四家全科医生诊所的797名0至4岁儿童的家长发送了调查问卷。将四种需求管理策略(共付费用、在线建议、医疗费用概述和次日上午全科医生预约)纳入两个医疗非紧急和两个紧急病例情景中。将病例情景与需求管理策略相结合产生了16个病例(四个情景,每个情景有四种需求管理策略)。每位家长随机收到一份问卷,其中包含三个不同的病例情景和三种不同的需求策略,以及一个没有需求管理策略的基线病例情景。
回复率为47.4%。在线建议策略在非紧急病例情景(比值比0.26;可信区间0.11至0.58)和紧急病例情景(比值比0.16;可信区间0.08至0.32)中都导致了更符合医学规范的决策。医疗费用概述(比值比0.59;可信区间0.38至0.92)和次日上午安排的全科医生预约(比值比0.57;可信区间0.34至0.97)对紧急病例患者的决策有一定影响,但对非紧急病例没有影响。共付费用对患者决策没有影响。
在线建议在减少不必要医疗使用方面具有最大潜力。此外,它提高了家长在非工作时间初级保健中为幼儿寻求帮助的决策安全性。应推广针对患者的关于健康症状的有效在线信息。