Cabarrou B, Mourey L, Dalenc F, Balardy L, Kanoun D, Roché H, Boher J M, Rougé-Bugat M E, Filleron Thomas
Biostatistics Unit, Bureau des Essais Cliniques, Institut Claudius Regaud-IUCT-Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot Curie, 31059, Toulouse, France.
Oncology Department, Institut Claudius Regaud-IUCT-O, Toulouse, France.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Aug;164(3):505-513. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4278-5. Epub 2017 May 9.
As the incidence of invasive breast cancer will increase with age, the number of elderly patients with a diagnosis metastatic breast cancer will also rise. But the use of cytotoxic drugs in elderly metastatic breast cancer patients is not systematic and is dreaded by medical oncologists. The need for prospective oncologic data from this population seems increasingly obvious. The main objective of this review is to investigate design and characteristics of phase II trials that assess activity and feasibility of chemotherapies in elderly advanced/metastatic breast cancer patients.
An electronic search in PUBMED allowed us to retrieve articles published in English language on phase II trials in elderly metastatic breast cancer between January 2002 and May 2016. Sixteen publications were finally included in this review.
The primary endpoint was a simple, a composite, and a co-primary endpoints in 11, three, and two studies, respectively. Efficacy was the primary objective in 15 studies: simple (n = 10), composite (n = 3), co-primary endpoints (n = 2). Composite or co-primary endpoints combined efficacy and toxicity. Thirteen studies used multistage designs.
Only five studies evaluated the feasibility, i.e., to jointly assess efficacy and tolerance to treatment (toxicity, quality of life, etc) as primary endpoint. Development of elderly specific phase III clinical trials might be challenging, it therefore seems essential to conduct phase II clinical trials evaluating jointly efficacy and toxicity in a well-defined geriatric population. Use of multistage designs that take into account heterogeneity would allow to identify a subpopulation at interim analysis and to reduce the number of patients exposed to an inefficient or a toxic treatment regimen. It is crucial to evaluate new therapies (targeted therapies, immunotherapies) using adequate methodologies (Study design, endpoint).
由于浸润性乳腺癌的发病率会随着年龄增长而上升,诊断为转移性乳腺癌的老年患者数量也会增加。但是细胞毒性药物在老年转移性乳腺癌患者中的使用并不系统,且受到肿瘤内科医生的畏惧。从这一人群获取前瞻性肿瘤学数据的需求似乎越来越明显。本综述的主要目的是调查评估老年晚期/转移性乳腺癌患者化疗活性和可行性的II期试验的设计和特征。
在PUBMED上进行电子检索,使我们能够检索到2002年1月至2016年5月间发表的关于老年转移性乳腺癌II期试验的英文文章。最终有16篇出版物被纳入本综述。
主要终点分别在11项、3项和2项研究中为单一终点、复合终点和共同主要终点。15项研究将疗效作为主要目标:单一终点(n = 10)、复合终点(n = 3)、共同主要终点(n = 2)。复合或共同主要终点将疗效和毒性结合在一起。13项研究采用了多阶段设计。
只有5项研究评估了可行性,即以联合评估疗效和对治疗的耐受性(毒性、生活质量等)作为主要终点。开展针对老年人的III期临床试验可能具有挑战性,因此在明确界定的老年人群中进行联合评估疗效和毒性的II期临床试验似乎至关重要。使用考虑到异质性的多阶段设计将允许在中期分析时识别出一个亚组,并减少接受无效或有毒治疗方案的患者数量。使用适当的方法(研究设计、终点)评估新疗法(靶向疗法、免疫疗法)至关重要。