Stroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia.
Stroke Division, Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Parkville, Vic, Australia.
Eur J Neurol. 2017 Jul;24(7):920-928. doi: 10.1111/ene.13306. Epub 2017 May 10.
Limited evidence exists on the benefits of organized care for improving risk factor control in patients with stroke or transient ischaemic attack. The effectiveness of an individualized management programme in reducing absolute cardiovascular disease risk in this high-risk population was determined.
This was a prospective, multicentre, cluster-randomized controlled trial with blinded assessment of outcomes and intention-to-treat analysis. Patients hospitalized for stroke/transient ischaemic attack and aged ≥18 years were recruited from four hospitals. General practices treating recruited patients were randomized to provide either usual care or an individualized management programme comprising nurse-led education and review of care plans by stroke specialists in addition to usual care. The primary outcome was a change in cardiovascular Framingham Risk Score between baseline and 12 months.
From January 2010 to November 2013, 156 general practices (280 patients) were randomly assigned to usual care (control) and 159 (283 patients) to the intervention. The median age was 70.1 years; 65% were male. Overall, >80% of participants were prescribed recommended secondary prevention therapies at baseline. The primary efficacy analysis comprised 533 participants, with 30 either dying or lost to follow-up. In adjusted analyses, no significant between-group difference was found in the cardiovascular risk score at 12 months (0.04, 95% confidence interval -1.7, 1.8).
The effectiveness of an organized secondary prevention programme for stroke may be limited in patients from high-performing hospitals with regular post-discharge follow-up and communication with general practices.
关于有组织的护理对改善中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者的危险因素控制的益处,目前证据有限。本研究旨在确定个体化管理方案在降低该高危人群绝对心血管疾病风险方面的有效性。
这是一项前瞻性、多中心、集群随机对照试验,对结局进行盲法评估和意向治疗分析。从四家医院招募因中风/短暂性脑缺血发作住院且年龄≥18 岁的患者。治疗招募患者的全科诊所被随机分配提供常规护理或个体化管理方案,包括护士主导的教育和中风专家对护理计划的审查,以及常规护理。主要结局是心血管Framingham 风险评分在基线和 12 个月时的变化。
2010 年 1 月至 2013 年 11 月,156 家全科诊所(280 名患者)被随机分配到常规护理(对照组),159 家(283 名患者)被分配到干预组。中位年龄为 70.1 岁,65%为男性。总体而言,超过 80%的参与者在基线时接受了推荐的二级预防治疗。主要疗效分析包括 533 名参与者,其中 30 名患者死亡或失访。在调整分析中,12 个月时心血管风险评分在两组之间无显著差异(0.04,95%置信区间-1.7,1.8)。
对于来自表现出色的医院的患者,这些患者在出院后有定期随访和与全科诊所的沟通,有组织的二级预防计划的有效性可能有限。