Suppr超能文献

肺癌中病变及参考纵隔标准化摄取值的测量不确定度

Measurement uncertainty of lesion and reference mediastinum standardized uptake value in lung cancer.

作者信息

Laffon Eric, Milpied Noel, Marthan Roger

机构信息

aCHU de Bordeaux, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hematology, Respiratory Medicine bUniversity of Bordeaux cINSERM U-1045, Centre de Recherche Cardio-Thoracique de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Nucl Med Commun. 2017 Jun;38(6):509-514. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000677.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess standardized uptake value (SUV) measurement uncertainty (MU) of lung cancer lesions with uptake greater than mediastinum but less than or equal to the liver and that of the mediastinum blood pool, and to compare lesion SUV with mediastinum SUV by assessing MU of their ratio.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Dynamic PET data involving 10 frames were retrospectively analyzed in 10 patients, yielding maximal SUV of 25 lesions (Lesion-SUVmax), 10 mediastinum SUV, either maximal or mean (Med-SUVmax, Med-SUVmean), 25 Rmax ratios (=Lesion-SUVmax/Med-SUVmax), and 25 Rmean ratios (=Lesion-SUVmax/Med-SUVmean). A mean coefficient of variation was calculated for each parameter, leading to relative measurement uncertainty (MUr), respectively.

RESULTS

MU of Rmax was found to involve both Lesion-SUVmax and Med-SUVmax MU: MUr=33.3-23.3-21.9%, respectively (95% confidence level). No significant difference in MUr was found between Med-SUVmax and Med-SUVmean and between Rmax and Rmean.

CONCLUSION

Comparison between target lesion SUV and reference mediastinum SUV must take into account SUV MU of both. Therefore, no MU reduction can be expected from using the lesion/mediastinum SUVmax ratio instead of Lesion-SUVmax. Moreover, no MU reduction can be expected from using the mean mediastinum SUV instead of the maximal one.

摘要

目的

评估摄取高于纵隔但低于或等于肝脏的肺癌病灶以及纵隔血池的标准化摄取值(SUV)测量不确定度(MU),并通过评估其比值的MU来比较病灶SUV与纵隔SUV。

患者与方法

回顾性分析10例患者包含10帧的动态PET数据,得出25个病灶的最大SUV(病灶-SUVmax)、10个纵隔SUV(最大或平均,Med-SUVmax、Med-SUVmean)、25个Rmax比值(=病灶-SUVmax/Med-SUVmax)以及25个Rmean比值(=病灶-SUVmax/Med-SUVmean)。分别计算每个参数的平均变异系数,得出相对测量不确定度(MUr)。

结果

发现Rmax的MU涉及病灶-SUVmax和Med-SUVmax的MU:MUr分别为33.3-23.3-21.9%(95%置信水平)。Med-SUVmax与Med-SUVmean之间以及Rmax与Rmean之间的MUr未发现显著差异。

结论

目标病灶SUV与参考纵隔SUV之间的比较必须同时考虑两者的SUV MU。因此,使用病灶/纵隔SUVmax比值而非病灶-SUVmax预计不会降低MU。此外,使用纵隔平均SUV而非最大SUV也预计不会降低MU。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验