Suppr超能文献

4A类微钙化:该亚类应如何应用于乳腺钼靶检查中所见的微钙化?

"Category 4A" microcalcifications: how should this subcategory be applied to microcalcifications seen on mammography?

作者信息

Kim Jihee, Kim Eun-Kyung, Kim Min Jung, Moon Hee Jung, Yoon Jung Hyun

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Severance Hospital, Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Acta Radiol. 2018 Feb;59(2):147-153. doi: 10.1177/0284185117709036. Epub 2017 May 10.

Abstract

Background The BI-RADS provides descriptors for microcalcifications based on morphology and distribution. However, the descriptor for category 4A microcalcifications is not specified in the 5th BI-RADS nor in the prior editions. Purpose To investigate how the category 4A assessment is applied to suspicious microcalcifications, and the appropriate descriptors for category 4A assessment for microcalcifications seen on mammography. Material and Methods From June 2008 to November 2011, 296 women with 305 suspicious microcalcifications that were assessed as BI-RADS category 4A, who underwent imaging-guided biopsy or surgery, were included. Mammograms were reviewed and imaging features were analyzed according to the morphology and distribution descriptors of the 5th edition of BI-RADS. Pathological results were considered as the reference standard. Positive predictive values were calculated and compared between morphology and distribution descriptors. Results The overall positive predictive value (PPV) of category 4A microcalcifications was 17.7% (54/305). Most common descriptors for category 4A microcalcifications were amorphous morphology (73.1%) and grouped distribution (71.1%). PPVs of individual morphology descriptors were as follows: amorphous = 7.2%; coarse heterogeneous = 12.8%; fine pleomorphic or fine linear/fine linear branching = 91.4% ( P < 0.001). PPVs of distribution descriptors were as follows: regional = 13.2%; grouped = 16.1%; linear/segmental = 54.5% ( P < 0.001). For morphology and distribution descriptors combinations, PPVs for amorphous/regional and amorphous/grouped microcalcifications were 6.8% and 6.9%, while PPVs of other combinations were higher than 10%, respectively. Conclusion Common descriptors used in category 4A assessment for microcalcifications are amorphous morphology and grouped distribution. PPV of amorphous/regional and amorphous/grouped microcalcifications were suitable for category 4A assessment.

摘要

背景

乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)根据微钙化的形态和分布提供描述符。然而,第5版BI-RADS及其先前版本均未明确4A类微钙化的描述符。目的:探讨4A类评估如何应用于可疑微钙化,以及乳腺钼靶检查中4A类微钙化评估的合适描述符。材料与方法:纳入2008年6月至2011年11月期间接受影像引导活检或手术的296例女性,其305处可疑微钙化被评估为BI-RADS 4A类。根据第5版BI-RADS的形态和分布描述符回顾乳腺钼靶图像并分析影像特征。以病理结果作为参考标准。计算形态学和分布描述符之间的阳性预测值并进行比较。结果:4A类微钙化的总体阳性预测值(PPV)为17.7%(54/305)。4A类微钙化最常见的描述符是无定形形态(73.1%)和成簇分布(71.1%)。各形态学描述符的PPV如下:无定形=7.2%;粗大不均质=12.8%;细多形性或细线性/细线性分支=91.4%(P<0.001)。分布描述符的PPV如下:区域性=13.2%;成簇=16.1%;线性/节段性=54.5%(P<0.001)。对于形态学和分布描述符的组合,无定形/区域性和成簇性微钙化的PPV分别为6.8%和6.9%,而其他组合的PPV均高于10%。结论:4A类微钙化评估中常用的描述符是无定形形态和成簇分布。无定形/区域性和成簇性微钙化的PPV适用于4A类评估。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验