Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, California, USA.
Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1105-1117. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.37. Epub 2017 May 11.
PurposeThe 2015 American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics-Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines were a major step toward establishing a common framework for variant classification. In practice, however, several aspects of the guidelines lack specificity, are subject to varied interpretations, or fail to capture relevant aspects of clinical molecular genetics. A simple implementation of the guidelines in their current form is insufficient for consistent and comprehensive variant classification.MethodsWe undertook an iterative process of refining the ACMG-AMP guidelines. We used the guidelines to classify more than 40,000 clinically observed variants, assessed the outcome, and refined the classification criteria to capture exceptions and edge cases. During this process, the criteria evolved through eight major and minor revisions.ResultsOur implementation: (i) separated ambiguous ACMG-AMP criteria into a set of discrete but related rules with refined weights; (ii) grouped certain criteria to protect against the overcounting of conceptually related evidence; and (iii) replaced the "clinical criteria" style of the guidelines with additive, semiquantitative criteria.ConclusionSherloc builds on the strong framework of 33 rules established by the ACMG-AMP guidelines and introduces 108 detailed refinements, which support a more consistent and transparent approach to variant classification.
目的
2015 年美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院-分子病理学协会(ACMG-AMP)指南是为建立变异分类通用框架迈出的重要一步。然而,在实践中,指南的几个方面缺乏特异性,容易产生不同的解释,或者未能捕捉到临床分子遗传学的相关方面。简单地执行当前形式的指南不足以进行一致和全面的变异分类。
方法
我们对 ACMG-AMP 指南进行了迭代细化。我们使用指南对超过 40,000 个临床观察到的变异进行了分类,评估了结果,并细化了分类标准以捕捉异常情况和边缘情况。在此过程中,标准经历了八次重大和次要修订。
结果
(i)将模糊的 ACMG-AMP 标准分为一组具有细化权重的离散但相关的规则;(ii)将某些标准分组以防止概念上相关证据的重复计数;(iii)用加性、半定量标准替代指南中的“临床标准”样式。
结论
Sherloc 建立在 ACMG-AMP 指南 33 条规则的强大框架基础上,并引入了 108 条详细的细化,为变异分类提供了更一致和透明的方法。