Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Department of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Genet Med. 2018 Sep;20(9):918-926. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0100-y. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
Understanding clinical genetic test results in the era of next-generation sequencing has become increasingly complex, necessitating clear and thorough guidelines for sequence variant interpretation. To meet this need the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP) published guidelines for a systematic approach for sequence variant interpretation in 2015. This framework is intended to be adaptable to any Mendelian condition, promoting transparency and consistency in variant interpretation, yet its comprehensive nature yields important challenges and caveats that end users must understand. In this review, we address some of these nuances and discuss the evolving efforts to refine and adapt this framework. We also consider the added complexity of distinguishing between variant-level interpretations and case-level conclusions, particularly in the context of the large gene panel approach to clinical diagnostics.
在新一代测序时代,理解临床基因检测结果变得越来越复杂,因此需要明确而全面的序列变异解读指南。为了满足这一需求,美国医学遗传学与基因组学学院(ACMG)和分子病理学协会(AMP)于 2015 年发布了用于序列变异解读的系统方法指南。该框架旨在适应任何孟德尔疾病,促进变异解读的透明度和一致性,但它的全面性带来了重要的挑战和注意事项,最终用户必须理解。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了其中的一些细微差别,并探讨了不断努力完善和调整这一框架的情况。我们还考虑了区分变异水平解读和病例水平结论之间的复杂性,特别是在临床诊断中使用大型基因面板方法的情况下。