Wehling Martin, Collins Ronan, Gil Victor M, Hanon Olivier, Hardt Roland, Hoffmeister Martin, Monteiro Pedro, Quinn Terence J, Ropers Dieter, Sergi Giuseppe, Verheugt Freek W A
Institute for Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-University Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany.
Stroke-Service/Age Related Health Care, Tallaght Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Drugs Aging. 2017 Jul;34(7):499-507. doi: 10.1007/s40266-017-0466-6.
Age appropriateness of anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation is uncertain.
To review oral anticoagulants for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in older (age >65 years) people and to classify appropriate and inappropriate drugs based on efficacy, safety and tolerability using the Fit-fOR-The-Aged (FORTA) classification.
We performed a structured comprehensive review of controlled clinical trials and summaries of individual product characteristics to assess study and total patient numbers, quality of major outcome data and data of geriatric relevance. The resulting evidence was discussed in a round table with an interdisciplinary panel of ten European experts. Decisions on age appropriateness were made using a Delphi process.
For the eight drugs included, 380 citations were identified. The primary outcome results were reported in 32 clinical trials with explicit and relevant data on older people. Though over 24,000 patients aged >75/80 years were studied for warfarin, data on geriatric syndromes were rare (two studies reporting on frailty/falls/mental status) and missing for all other compounds. Apixaban was rated FORTA-A (highly beneficial). Other non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (including low/high-intensity dabigatran and high-intensity edoxaban) and warfarin were assigned to FORTA-B (beneficial). Phenprocoumon, acenocoumarol and fluindione were rated FORTA-C (questionable), mainly reflecting the absence of data.
All non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants and warfarin were classified as beneficial or very beneficial in older persons (FORTA-A or -B), underlining the overall positive assessment of the risk/benefit ratio for these drugs. For other vitamin-K antagonists regionally used in Europe, the lack of evidence should challenge current practice.
心房颤动患者预防卒中时抗凝剂的年龄适宜性尚不确定。
回顾用于老年(年龄>65岁)人心房颤动治疗的口服抗凝剂,并根据疗效、安全性和耐受性,采用“适合老年人的药物”(FORTA)分类法对合适及不合适的药物进行分类。
我们对对照临床试验和各产品特征总结进行了结构化全面回顾,以评估研究数量和患者总数、主要结局数据质量以及老年相关数据。所得证据在由十名欧洲专家组成的跨学科小组参加的圆桌会议上进行了讨论。使用德尔菲法就年龄适宜性做出决策。
对于纳入的8种药物,共识别出380篇引文。32项临床试验报告了主要结局结果,其中包含关于老年人的明确且相关的数据。虽然对华法林进行了超过24000例年龄>75/80岁患者的研究,但关于老年综合征的数据很少(两项研究报告了衰弱/跌倒/精神状态),其他所有化合物均未提供此类数据。阿哌沙班被评为FORTA - A(非常有益)。其他非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(包括低/高强度达比加群和高强度依度沙班)以及华法林被归为FORTA - B(有益)。苯丙香豆素、醋硝香豆素和氟茚二酮被评为FORTA - C(有疑问),主要是因为缺乏数据。
所有非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂和华法林在老年人中被分类为有益或非常有益(FORTA - A或 - B),这突出了对这些药物风险/获益比的总体积极评估。对于欧洲地区使用的其他维生素K拮抗剂,证据的缺乏应对当前的应用提出挑战。