• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 Cochrane 图书馆的系统评价报告对荟萃分析的时间趋势进行大规模评估。

A large-scale assessment of temporal trends in meta-analyses using systematic review reports from the Cochrane Library.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):404-415. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1238. Epub 2017 May 11.

DOI:10.1002/jrsm.1238
PMID:28493383
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies suggest that many systematic reviews contain meta-analyses that display temporal trends, such as the first study's result being more extreme than later studies' or a drift in the pooled estimate. We assessed the extent and characteristics of temporal trends using all Cochrane intervention reports published 2008-2012.

METHODS

We selected the largest meta-analysis within each report and analysed trends using methods including a Z-test (first versus subsequent estimates); generalised least squares; and cumulative sum charts. Predictors considered include meta-analysis size and review group.

RESULTS

Of 1288 meta-analyses containing at least 4 studies, the point estimate from the first study was more extreme and in the same direction as the pooled estimate in 738 (57%), with a statistically significant difference (first versus subsequent) in 165 (13%). Generalised least squares indicated trends in 717 (56%); 18% of fixed effects analyses had at least one violation of cumulative sum limits. For some methods, meta-analysis size was associated with temporal patterns and use of a random effects model, but there was no consistent association with review group.

CONCLUSIONS

All results suggest that more meta-analyses demonstrate temporal patterns than would be expected by chance. Hence, assuming the standard meta-analysis model without temporal trend is sometimes inappropriate. Factors associated with trends are likely to be context specific.

摘要

简介

先前的研究表明,许多系统评价包含显示时间趋势的荟萃分析,例如第一项研究的结果比后续研究的结果更为极端,或者汇总估计值出现漂移。我们评估了使用 2008-2012 年发表的所有 Cochrane 干预报告,评估时间趋势的程度和特征。

方法

我们选择了每个报告中最大的荟萃分析,并使用包括 Z 检验(首次与后续估计值)、广义最小二乘法和累积和图在内的方法分析趋势。考虑的预测因素包括荟萃分析规模和综述组。

结果

在包含至少 4 项研究的 1288 项荟萃分析中,首次研究的点估计值与汇总估计值方向相同且更为极端,有统计学意义差异(首次与后续)的有 165 项(13%)。广义最小二乘法表明 717 项荟萃分析存在趋势(56%);18%的固定效应分析至少有一个违反累积和限制。对于某些方法,荟萃分析规模与时间模式相关,并且使用随机效应模型,但与综述组没有一致的关联。

结论

所有结果均表明,显示时间趋势的荟萃分析比随机预期的要多。因此,假设没有时间趋势的标准荟萃分析模型有时是不适当的。与趋势相关的因素可能因具体情况而异。

相似文献

1
A large-scale assessment of temporal trends in meta-analyses using systematic review reports from the Cochrane Library.使用 Cochrane 图书馆的系统评价报告对荟萃分析的时间趋势进行大规模评估。
Res Synth Methods. 2017 Dec;8(4):404-415. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1238. Epub 2017 May 11.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Evidence for differences in patterns of temporal trends in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies in the Cochrane database of systematic reviews.在 Cochrane 系统评价数据库中对诊断准确性研究进行荟萃分析的时间趋势模式差异的证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Oct;174:111472. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111472. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
4
Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions.在医疗保健干预随机试验的系统评价中,因对结果和分析进行选择性纳入及报告而产生的偏倚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 1;2014(10):MR000035. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000035.pub2.
5
Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.回复拉赫曼·希里博士的来信:职业群体中的自杀这一具有挑战性的话题。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2018 Jan 1;44(1):108-110. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3698. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
6
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.小班教学对提高中小学学生成绩的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Assessment of temporal instability in the applied ecology and conservation evidence base.评估应用生态学和保护证据基础中的时间不稳定性。
Res Synth Methods. 2024 May;15(3):398-412. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1691. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
9
Unrestricted weighted least squares represent medical research better than random effects in 67,308 Cochrane meta-analyses.无约束加权最小二乘法比随机效应模型在 67308 项 Cochrane 荟萃分析中更能代表医学研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 May;157:53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.004. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
10
Generalized least squares for assessing trends in cumulative meta-analysis with applications in genetic epidemiology.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1037-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.发表偏倚对生态学和进化生物学中的效应大小、统计功效和幅度(M 型)以及符号(S 型)错误有影响。
BMC Biol. 2023 Apr 3;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12915-022-01485-y.
2
How much does the typical ecological meta-analysis overestimate the true mean effect size?典型的生态元分析会高估真实平均效应量多少?
Ecol Evol. 2022 Nov 15;12(11):e9521. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9521. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
Are the effects of blood pressure lowering treatment diminishing?: meta-regression analyses.
降压治疗的效果正在减弱吗?:Meta回归分析
Clin Hypertens. 2018 Nov 15;24:16. doi: 10.1186/s40885-018-0101-9. eCollection 2018.