A Randomized Study Comparing Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Conventional Therapy for Low- and Intermediate-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes Patients.

The treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) involves improving patient survival and quality of life (QoL) and decreasing the likelihood of progression to AML. Although the treatment outcomes of MDS remain unsatisfactory, few comparative studies have been performed while comparing the outcomes of low-risk and intermediate-risk patients treated with supportive care and chemotherapeutics to those of patients treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Therefore, we designed a clinical control study to compare the outcomes of supportive care and chemotherapeutics versus allo-HSCT treatment in MDS patients. A total of 182 patients with MDS were enrolled in the study, including 91 in the no-HSCT (control) group and 91 in the allo-HSCT group. The complete remission (CR) rate in the allo-HSCT group was significantly higher than that in the control group (53.8% vs. 33.0%; P < 0.05). The QoL of patients in the HSCT group was much higher than that in the control group (53.8% vs. 37.4%; P < 0.05). The overall survival (OS) rates were 79.0% and 56.0% (P < 0.05) in the HSCT group and the control group, respectively. In conclusion, a high-dose fludarabine (Flu), busulfan (Bu), cyclophosphamide (CTX)-based conditioning regimen was well tolerated and significantly speeded hematopoietic recovery. In addition, this regimen increased procedure-related toxicity and improved QoL and OS.