Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA; Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Epidemiology Unit, Ensign College of Public Health, Kpong, Ghana.
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Jun;5(6):e615-e623. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30145-6.
In low-income and middle-income countries, invasive mechanical ventilation is often not available for children at risk of death from respiratory failure. We aimed to determine if continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), a form of non-invasive ventilation, decreases all-cause mortality in children with undifferentiated respiratory distress in Ghana.
This open-label, cluster, crossover trial was done in two Ghanaian non-tertiary hospitals where invasive mechanical ventilation is not routinely available. Eligible participants were children aged from 1 month to 5 years with a respiratory rate of more than 50 breaths per min in children 1-12 months old, or more than 40 breaths per min in children older than 12 months, and use of accessory muscles or nasal flaring. CPAP machines were allocated to one hospital during each study block, while the other hospital served as the control site. The initial intervention site was randomly chosen using a coin toss. 5 cm of water pressure was delivered via CPAP nasal prongs. The primary outcome measure was all-cause mortality rate at 2 weeks after enrolment in patients for whom data were available after 2 weeks. We also did post-hoc regression analysis and subgroup analysis of children by malaria status, oxygen saturation, and age. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01839474.
Between Jan 20, 2014, and Dec 5, 2015, 2200 children were enrolled: 1025 at the intervention site and 1175 at the control site. Final analysis included 1021 patients in the CPAP group and 1160 patients in the control group. 2 weeks after enrolment, 26 (3%) of 1021 patients in the CPAP group, and 44 (4%) of 1160 patients in the control group, had died (relative risk [RR] of mortality 0·67, 95% CI 0·42-1·08; p=0·11). In children younger than 1 year, all-cause mortality was ten (3%) of 374 patients in the CPAP group, and 24 (7%) of 359 patients in the control group (RR 0·40, 0·19-0·82; p=0·01). After adjustment for study site, time, and clinically important variables, the odds ratio for 2-week mortality in the CPAP group versus the control group was 0·4 in children aged up to 6 months, 0·5 for children aged 12 months, 0·7 for children aged 24 months, and 1·0 for those aged 36 months. 28 patients (3%) in the CPAP group and 24 patients (2%) in the control group had CPAP-related adverse events, such as vomiting, aspiration, and nasal, skin, or eye trauma. No serious adverse events were observed.
In the unadjusted analysis the use of CPAP did not decrease all-cause 2-week mortality in children 1 month to 5 years of age with undifferentiated respiratory distress. After adjustment for study site, time, and clinically important variables, 2-week mortality in the CPAP group versus the control group was significantly decreased in children 1 year of age and younger. CPAP is safe and improves respiratory rate in a non-tertiary setting in a lower-middle-income country.
General Electric Foundation.
在低收入和中等收入国家,患有呼吸衰竭风险的儿童往往无法获得有创机械通气。我们旨在确定在加纳,对于未明确诊断的呼吸窘迫的儿童,与持续气道正压通气(CPAP)相比,非侵入性通气的另一种形式——持续正压通气(CPAP)是否可以降低死亡率。
这是一项在加纳两家非三级医院进行的开放标签、群组、交叉试验,在这些医院中,常规不使用有创机械通气。符合条件的参与者为年龄在 1 个月至 5 岁之间、1-12 个月的儿童呼吸频率超过 50 次/分钟,或年龄大于 12 个月的儿童呼吸频率超过 40 次/分钟,且使用辅助呼吸肌或鼻翼煽动的儿童。在每个研究阶段,CPAP 机器被分配到一家医院,而另一家医院则作为对照点。初始干预点使用抛硬币随机选择。通过 CPAP 鼻塞输送 5 厘米水柱的压力。主要结局测量指标是在有数据可用于 2 周后,登记的患者在 2 周后所有原因的死亡率。我们还进行了事后回归分析和按疟疾状态、氧饱和度和年龄进行的亚组分析。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,编号为 NCT01839474。
2014 年 1 月 20 日至 2015 年 12 月 5 日期间,共登记了 2200 名儿童:干预组 1025 名,对照组 1175 名。最终分析包括 CPAP 组 1021 名患者和对照组 1160 名患者。登记后 2 周,CPAP 组 1021 名患者中有 26 名(3%),对照组 1160 名患者中有 44 名(4%)死亡(死亡率的相对风险 [RR]为 0.67,95%CI 为 0.42-1.08;p=0.11)。在年龄小于 1 岁的儿童中,CPAP 组 374 名患者中有 10 名(3%),对照组 359 名患者中有 24 名(7%)死亡(RR 0.40,0.19-0.82;p=0.01)。在调整了研究地点、时间和临床重要变量后,CPAP 组与对照组在 2 周时的死亡比值比(OR)在年龄达 6 个月的儿童中为 0.4,在 12 个月的儿童中为 0.5,在 24 个月的儿童中为 0.7,在 36 个月的儿童中为 1.0。CPAP 组有 28 名(3%)患者和对照组有 24 名(2%)患者发生与 CPAP 相关的不良事件,如呕吐、吸入、鼻、皮肤或眼部创伤。没有观察到严重不良事件。
在未调整的分析中,CPAP 的使用并未降低 1 个月至 5 岁的患有未明确诊断的呼吸窘迫的儿童在 2 周内的总死亡率。在调整了研究地点、时间和临床重要变量后,CPAP 组与对照组相比,1 岁及以下儿童的 2 周死亡率显著降低。CPAP 在中低收入国家的非三级环境中是安全的,并且可以改善呼吸频率。
通用电气基金会。