Elliott Jesse, Kelly Shannon E, Johnston Amy, Skidmore Becky, Gomes Tara, Wells George A
Affiliations: School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine (Elliott, Kelly, Wells), University of Ottawa; Cardiovascular Research Methods Centre (Elliott, Kelly, Johnston, Wells), University of Ottawa Heart Institute; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute (Gomes), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont. Becky Skidmore is an independent contractor in Ottawa, Ont.
CMAJ Open. 2017 May 10;5(2):E373-E385. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20160066.
Allergic rhinitis and asthma are important public health concerns, yet there is no consensus about the benefits and harms of allergen-specific immunotherapy to treat these conditions. We performed an umbrella review of systematic reviews summarizing the current evidence for the benefits and harms of subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT).
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and the grey literature from Jan. 1, 2010 to Nov. 20, 2016 for systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials or prospectively controlled studies involving children or adults with allergic rhinitis or asthma. Outcomes were summarized narratively (benefits: total combined symptom-medication score, symptom score, medication score, disease-specific quality of life, adherence; harms: anaphylaxis, death, local and systemic reactions).
Twenty-three systematic reviews were included. SCIT and SLIT were more effective than placebo for most outcomes. SCIT was better than SLIT at improving medication and symptom scores, with no differences in quality of life; however, data were limited for this comparison. Anaphylaxis and death were infrequently reported. Few reviews assessed benefits or harms among children.
Allergen immunotherapy appears to be effective among patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma. The safety of allergen immunotherapy is not conclusively established, although death and anaphylaxis appear to be rare. PROSPERO no.: CRD42015024590.
过敏性鼻炎和哮喘是重要的公共卫生问题,但对于变应原特异性免疫疗法治疗这些疾病的利弊尚无共识。我们对系统评价进行了一项汇总分析,总结了皮下免疫疗法(SCIT)和舌下免疫疗法(SLIT)利弊的现有证据。
我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane图书馆以及灰色文献,检索时间为2010年1月1日至2016年11月20日,以查找涉及患有过敏性鼻炎或哮喘的儿童或成人的随机对照试验或前瞻性对照研究的系统评价。结果采用叙述性总结(益处:症状-药物综合总分、症状评分、药物评分、疾病特异性生活质量、依从性;危害:过敏反应、死亡、局部和全身反应)。
纳入了23项系统评价。对于大多数结局,SCIT和SLIT比安慰剂更有效。在改善药物和症状评分方面,SCIT优于SLIT,生活质量方面无差异;然而,该比较的数据有限。过敏反应和死亡的报告很少。很少有评价评估儿童的益处或危害。
变应原免疫疗法在过敏性鼻炎和哮喘患者中似乎有效。变应原免疫疗法的安全性尚未最终确定,尽管死亡和过敏反应似乎很少见。国际前瞻性系统评价注册编号:CRD42015024590。