Hossenbaccus Lubnaa, Linton Sophia, Garvey Sarah, Ellis Anne K
Department of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Canada.
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020 May 27;16:39. doi: 10.1186/s13223-020-00436-y. eCollection 2020.
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa impacting up to 25% of Canadians. The standard of care for AR includes a treatment plan that takes into account patient preferences, the severity of the disease, and most essentially involves a shared decision-making process between patient and provider.
Since their introduction in the 1940s, antihistamines (AHs) have been the most utilized class of medications for the treatment of AR. First-generation AHs are associated with adverse central nervous system (CNS) and anticholinergic side effects. On the market in the 1980s, newer generation AHs have improved safety and efficacy. Compared to antihistamines, intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) have significantly greater efficacy but longer onset of action. Intranasal AH and INCS combinations offer a single medication option that offers broader disease coverage and faster symptom control. However, cost and twice-per-day dosing remain a major limitation. Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying option and can be provided through subcutaneous (SCIT) or sublingual (SLIT) routes. While SCIT has been the definitive management option for many years, SLIT tablets (SLIT-T) have also been proven to be safe and efficacious.
There is a range of available treatment options for AR that reflect the varying disease length and severity. For mild to moderate AR, newer generation AHs should be the first-line treatment, while INCS are mainstay treatments for moderate to severe AR. In patients who do not respond to INCS, a combination of intranasal AH/INCS (AZE/FP) should be considered, assuming that cost is not a limiting factor. While SCIT remains the option with the most available allergens that can be targeted, it has the potential for severe systemic adverse effects and requires weekly visits for administration during the first 4 to 6 months. SLIT-T is a newer approach that provides the ease of being self-administered and presents a reduced risk for systemic reactions. In any case, standard care for AR includes a treatment plan that takes into account disease severity and patient preferences.
过敏性鼻炎(AR)是一种影响多达25%加拿大人的鼻黏膜炎症性疾病。AR的标准治疗方案包括一个考虑患者偏好、疾病严重程度的治疗计划,并且最关键的是涉及患者与医疗服务提供者之间的共同决策过程。
自20世纪40年代问世以来,抗组胺药(AHs)一直是治疗AR最常用的药物类别。第一代抗组胺药与不良中枢神经系统(CNS)和抗胆碱能副作用相关。新一代抗组胺药于20世纪80年代上市,安全性和疗效有所改善。与抗组胺药相比,鼻用糖皮质激素(INCS)疗效显著更高,但起效时间更长。鼻用抗组胺药和鼻用糖皮质激素联合使用提供了一种单一药物选择,可覆盖更广泛的疾病范围并更快控制症状。然而,成本和每日两次给药仍然是一个主要限制因素。变应原免疫疗法(AIT)是唯一可改变疾病进程的选择,可通过皮下(SCIT)或舌下(SLIT)途径进行。虽然多年来SCIT一直是确定性的治疗选择,但舌下含服片剂(SLIT-T)也已被证明是安全有效的。
对于AR有一系列可用的治疗选择,这些选择反映了疾病的不同病程和严重程度。对于轻度至中度AR,新一代抗组胺药应作为一线治疗,而鼻用糖皮质激素是中度至重度AR的主要治疗方法。在对鼻用糖皮质激素无反应的患者中,假设成本不是限制因素,应考虑鼻用抗组胺药与鼻用糖皮质激素联合使用(氮卓斯汀/氟替卡松)。虽然SCIT仍然是可针对的变应原最多的选择,但它有发生严重全身不良反应的可能性,并且在最初4至6个月需要每周就诊给药。SLIT-T是一种较新的方法,具有自我给药方便且全身反应风险降低的特点。在任何情况下,AR的标准治疗都包括一个考虑疾病严重程度和患者偏好的治疗计划。