Lee Kyoung-Hyun, Chong Raymond K
Center for Sport Science in Gwangju, Gwangju Sports CouncilGwangju, South Korea.
Department of Physical Therapy, Augusta UniversityAugusta, GA, USA.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Apr 27;11:187. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00187. eCollection 2017.
Achieving a soft landing during walking can be quantified by analyzing changes in the vertical velocity of the body center of mass (CoM) just prior to the landing of the swing limb. Previous research suggests that walking speed and step length may predictably influence the extent of this CoM control. Here we ask how stable this control is. We altered treadmill walking speed by systematically increasing or decreasing it at fixed intervals. We then reversed direction. We hypothesized that the control of the CoM vertical velocity during the late stance of the walking gait may serve as an order parameter which has an attribute of hysteresis. The presence of hysteresis implies that the CoM control is not based on simply knowing the current input conditions to predict the output response. Instead, there is also the influence of previous speed conditions on the ongoing responses. We found that the magnitudes of CoM control were different depending on whether the treadmill speed (as the control parameter) was ramped up or down. Changes in step length also influenced CoM control. A stronger effect was observed when the treadmill speed was speeded up compared to down. However, the effect of speed direction remained significant after controlling for step length. The hysteresis effect of CoM control as a function of speed history demonstrated in the current study suggests that the regulation of CoM vertical velocity during late stance is influenced by previous external conditions and constraints which combine to influence the desired behavioral outcome.
在摆动肢体着地之前,通过分析身体质心(CoM)垂直速度的变化,可以量化步行过程中实现软着陆的情况。先前的研究表明,步行速度和步长可能会可预测地影响这种质心控制的程度。在此,我们探究这种控制的稳定性如何。我们通过以固定间隔系统地增加或降低跑步机步行速度来改变步行速度。然后我们改变方向。我们假设步行步态后期支撑阶段质心垂直速度的控制可能作为一个具有滞后特性的序参量。滞后现象的存在意味着质心控制并非仅仅基于了解当前输入条件来预测输出响应。相反,先前速度条件对正在进行的响应也有影响。我们发现,根据跑步机速度(作为控制参数)是上升还是下降,质心控制的幅度有所不同。步长的变化也会影响质心控制。与速度下降相比,速度上升时观察到更强的影响。然而,在控制步长后,速度方向的影响仍然显著。本研究中所展示的质心控制作为速度历史函数的滞后效应表明,后期支撑阶段质心垂直速度的调节受到先前外部条件和约束的影响,这些条件和约束共同作用以影响期望的行为结果。