Balzer Claudius, Raackow David, Hahnenkamp Klaus, Flessa Steffen, Meissner Konrad
Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Kaufmännischer Vorstand, Referat Controlling, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Apr 27;4:49. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00049. eCollection 2017.
Resource and cost constraints in hospitals demand thorough planning of operating room schedules. Ideally, exact start times and durations are known in advance for each case. However, aside from the first case's start, most factors are hard to predict. While the role of the start of the first case for optimal room utilization has been shown before, data for to-follow cases are lacking. The present study therefore aimed to analyze all elective surgery cases of a university hospital within 1 year in search of visible patterns. A total of 14,014 cases scheduled on 254 regular working days at a university hospital between September 2015 and August 2016 underwent screening. After eliminating 112 emergencies during regular working hours, 13,547 elective daytime cases were analyzed, out of which 4,346 ranked first, 3,723 second, and 5,478 third or higher in the daily schedule. Also, 36% of cases changed start times from the day before to 7:00 a.m., with half of these (52%) resulting in a delay of more than 15 min. After 7:00 a.m., 87% of cases started more than 10 min off schedule, with 26% being early and 74% late. Timeliness was 15 ± 72 min (mean ± SD) for first, 21 ± 84 min for second, and 25 ± 93 min for all to-follow cases, compared to preoperative day planning, and 21 ± 45, 23 ± 61, and 19 ± 74 min compared to 7:00 a.m. status. Start time deviations were also related to procedure duration, with cases of 61-90 min duration being most reliable (deviation 9.8 ± 67 min compared to 7:00 a.m.), regardless of order. In consequence, cases following after 61-90 min long cases had the shortest deviations of incision time from schedule (16 ± 66 min). Taken together, start times for elective surgery cases deviate substantially from schedule, with first and second cases falling into the highest mean deviation category. Second cases had the largest deviations from scheduled times compared to first and all to-follow cases. While planned vs. actual start times differ among specialties, cases of 61-90 min duration had the most reliable start times, with neither shorter nor longer cases seeming to improve timeliness of start times.
医院的资源和成本限制要求对手术室日程进行全面规划。理想情况下,每个病例的准确开始时间和持续时间应提前知晓。然而,除了第一台手术的开始时间外,大多数因素都难以预测。虽然之前已经表明第一台手术的开始时间对优化手术室利用率的作用,但后续病例的数据却很缺乏。因此,本研究旨在分析一家大学医院1年内所有择期手术病例,以寻找明显的模式。对2015年9月至2016年8月期间在一家大学医院254个正常工作日安排的总共14,014例病例进行了筛查。在排除正常工作时间内的112例急诊病例后,对13,547例择期日间病例进行了分析,其中4,346例在每日日程中排名第一,3,723例排名第二,5,478例排名第三或更高。此外,36%的病例将开始时间从一天前改为上午7:00,其中一半(52%)导致延迟超过15分钟。上午7: [原文此处有误,应是7:00] 之后,87%的病例开始时间比计划推迟超过10分钟,其中26%提前开始,74%延迟开始。与术前一天的计划相比,第一台手术的准时性为15±72分钟(平均值±标准差),第二台手术为21±84分钟,所有后续病例为25±93分钟;与上午7:00的状态相比,分别为21±45分钟、23±61分钟和19±74分钟。开始时间偏差也与手术持续时间有关,无论顺序如何,持续时间为61 - 90分钟的病例最可靠(与上午7:00相比偏差为9.8±67分钟)。因此,在持续时间为61 - 90分钟的长病例之后进行的病例,其切口时间与计划的偏差最短(16±66分钟)。综上所述,择期手术病例的开始时间与计划有很大偏差,第一台和第二台手术的平均偏差最大。与第一台和所有后续病例相比,第二台手术与计划时间的偏差最大。虽然不同专科的计划开始时间与实际开始时间有所不同,但持续时间为61 - 90分钟的病例开始时间最可靠,较短或较长的病例似乎都不能提高开始时间的准时性。