• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝移植后T细胞介导排斥反应临床疑似情况的客观定义。

An objective definition for clinical suspicion of T-cell-mediated rejection after liver transplantation.

作者信息

Rodríguez-Perálvarez Manuel, De Luca Laura, Crespo Gonzalo, Rubin Ángel, Marín Sandra, Benlloch Salvador, Colmenero Jordi, Berenguer Marina, Navasa Miguel, Tsochatzis Emmanuel, De la Mata Manuel

机构信息

Department of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Reina Sofía University Hospital, IMIBIC, CIBERehd, Córdoba, Spain.

UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health and Sheila Sherlock Liver Unit, Royal Free Hospital and UCL, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2017 Jul;31(7). doi: 10.1111/ctr.13005. Epub 2017 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.13005
PMID:28497582
Abstract

A uniform definition of clinical suspicion of T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) in liver transplantation (LT) is needed to homogenize clinical decisions, especially within randomized trials. This multicenter study included a total of 470 primary LT recipients. The derivation cohort consisted of 142 patients who had clinically driven liver biopsies at any time after LT. The external validation cohort included 328 patients who underwent protocol biopsies at day 7-10 after LT. The rates of moderate-severe histological TCMR were 33.8% in the derivation cohort and 43.6% in the validation cohort. Independent predictors (ie, risk factors) of moderate-severe TCMR in the derivation cohort were as follows: serum bilirubin >4 mg/dL (OR=5.83; P<.001), rising bilirubin within the 4 days prior to liver biopsy (OR=4.57; P=.003), and blood eosinophils count >0.1×10 /L (OR=3.81; P=.004). In the validation cohort, the number of risk factors was an independent predictor of moderate-severe TCMR (OR=1.74; P=.001), after controlling for hepatitis C status. The number of risk factors paralleled the rates of moderate-severe TCMR in the derivation and validation cohorts (P<.001 in both comparisons). In conclusion, increased serum bilirubin, rising bilirubin and eosinophilia are validated risk factors for moderate-severe histological TCMR and could be used as objective criteria to select candidates for liver biopsy.

摘要

肝移植(LT)中需要对T细胞介导的排斥反应(TCMR)的临床怀疑有统一的定义,以使临床决策同质化,尤其是在随机试验中。这项多中心研究共纳入了470例初次LT受者。推导队列由142例LT后任何时间进行临床驱动肝活检的患者组成。外部验证队列包括328例LT后第7 - 10天接受方案活检的患者。推导队列中中度至重度组织学TCMR的发生率为33.8%,验证队列中为43.6%。推导队列中中度至重度TCMR的独立预测因素(即危险因素)如下:血清胆红素>4 mg/dL(OR = 5.83;P <.001)、肝活检前4天内胆红素升高(OR = 4.57;P =.003)以及血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数>0.1×10⁹/L(OR = 3.81;P =.004)。在验证队列中,在控制丙型肝炎状态后,危险因素的数量是中度至重度TCMR的独立预测因素(OR = 1.74;P =.001)。危险因素的数量与推导队列和验证队列中中度至重度TCMR的发生率平行(两项比较中P均<.001)。总之,血清胆红素升高、胆红素升高和嗜酸性粒细胞增多是中度至重度组织学TCMR的经验证的危险因素,可作为选择肝活检候选者的客观标准。

相似文献

1
An objective definition for clinical suspicion of T-cell-mediated rejection after liver transplantation.肝移植后T细胞介导排斥反应临床疑似情况的客观定义。
Clin Transplant. 2017 Jul;31(7). doi: 10.1111/ctr.13005. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
2
Not All Cellular Rejections Are the Same: Differences in Early and Late Hepatic Allograft Rejection.并非所有细胞性排斥反应都相同:肝移植早期和晚期排斥反应的差异
Liver Transpl. 2019 Mar;25(3):425-435. doi: 10.1002/lt.25411.
3
Predicting severity and clinical course of acute rejection after liver transplantation using blood eosinophil count.使用血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数预测肝移植后急性排斥反应的严重程度和临床过程。
Transpl Int. 2012 May;25(5):555-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01457.x. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
4
Hematological and biochemical characteristics and diagnostic imaging results in acute T cell-mediated rejection after pediatric liver transplantation.小儿肝移植术后急性 T 细胞介导排斥的血液学和生化学特征及诊断影像学结果。
Pediatr Transplant. 2022 Mar;26(2):e14161. doi: 10.1111/petr.14161. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
5
Hepatitis E virus genotype 3 is a common finding in liver-transplanted patients undergoing liver biopsy for elevated liver enzymes with a low De Ritis ratio and suspected acute rejection: A real-world cohort.戊型肝炎病毒基因型 3 在因肝酶升高、De Ritis 比值低和疑似急性排斥而行肝活检的肝移植患者中较为常见:一项真实世界队列研究。
Clin Transplant. 2018 Nov;32(11):e13411. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13411. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
6
Disappearance of T Cell-Mediated Rejection Despite Continued Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Late Kidney Transplant Recipients.晚期肾移植受者中,尽管存在持续的抗体介导排斥反应,但T细胞介导的排斥反应消失。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jul;26(7):1711-20. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014060588. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
7
Severe Unresolved Cholestasis Due to Unknown Etiology Leading to Early Allograft Failure Within the First 3 Months of Liver Transplantation.不明病因导致的严重未解决胆汁淤积,导致肝移植后 3 个月内早期移植物失功。
Transplantation. 2018 Aug;102(8):1307-1315. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002139.
8
Development of a multivariable gene-expression signature targeting T-cell-mediated rejection in peripheral blood of kidney transplant recipients validated in cross-sectional and longitudinal samples.开发一种多变量基因表达特征,针对肾移植受者外周血中的 T 细胞介导的排斥反应,在横断面和纵向样本中得到验证。
EBioMedicine. 2019 Mar;41:571-583. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.01.060. Epub 2019 Mar 2.
9
Lack of agreement for defining 'clinical suspicion of rejection' in liver transplantation: a model to select candidates for liver biopsy.肝移植中“临床怀疑排斥反应”定义缺乏一致性:一种选择肝活检候选者的模型
Transpl Int. 2015 Apr;28(4):455-64. doi: 10.1111/tri.12514. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
10
Rejection of the Renal Allograft in the Absence of Demonstrable Antibody and Complement.无明显抗体和补体情况下肾移植的排斥反应
Transplantation. 2017 Feb;101(2):395-401. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001118.

引用本文的文献

1
Banff 2016 Global Assessment and Quantitative Scoring for T Cell-Mediated Liver Transplant Rejection are Interchangeable.2016年班夫T细胞介导的肝移植排斥反应全球评估与定量评分可互换。
J Transplant. 2023 Mar 27;2023:3103335. doi: 10.1155/2023/3103335. eCollection 2023.
2
Iguratimod Attenuates Macrophage Polarization and Antibody-Mediated Rejection After Renal Transplant by Regulating KLF4.艾拉莫德通过调控KLF4减轻肾移植后巨噬细胞极化和抗体介导的排斥反应。
Front Pharmacol. 2022 May 9;13:865363. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.865363. eCollection 2022.