Wang Norman C, Adelstein Evan C, Jain Sandeep K, Mendenhall G Stuart, Shalaby Alaa A, Voigt Andrew H, Saba Samir
Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017 Nov;22(6). doi: 10.1111/anec.12466. Epub 2017 May 12.
Predictors and implications of early left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in new-onset idiopathic nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) with narrow QRS complex are not well described. The objectives were to describe predictors of LVEF improvement after 3 months on GDMT and adverse cardiac events based on post-GDMT LVEF status (≤35% vs. >35%).
A retrospective cohort study was performed in subjects with new-onset NICM, LVEF ≤35%, and narrow QRS complex. Associations for baseline variables with post-GDMT LVEF improvement and absolute change in LVEF (∆LVEF ) were assessed. Cox proportional hazards models assessed associations for post-GDMT LVEF status with adverse cardiac events.
In 70 subjects, 31 (44%) had post-GDMT LVEF ≤35% after a median follow-up time of 97.5 days (interquartile range, 84-121 days). In final multivariable models, severely dilated left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), compared with normal LVEDD, strongly predicted post-GDMT LVEF ≤35% (odds ratio, 7.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.39-43.49; p = .02) and ∆LVEF (β = -15.709; standard error = 4.622; p = .001). Subjects with post-GDMT LVEF ≤35% were more likely to have adverse cardiac events over a median follow-up time of 970.5 days (unadjusted hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.93-4.96; p = .07). In the post-GDMT LVEF ≤35% group, 9 of 26 subjects (35%) had long-term LVEF > 35%.
In new-onset NICM with narrow QRS complex, nondilated LVEDD predicted early LVEF improvement. Those with post-GDMT LVEF ≤35% had higher risk of adverse cardiac events, but a substantial proportion demonstrated continued long-term LVEF improvement.
在新发性特发性非缺血性心肌病(NICM)伴窄QRS波群中,早期左心室射血分数(LVEF)通过指南导向的药物治疗(GDMT)得到改善的预测因素及影响尚未得到充分描述。目的是描述接受GDMT治疗3个月后LVEF改善的预测因素以及基于GDMT治疗后LVEF状态(≤35%与>35%)的不良心脏事件。
对新发性NICM、LVEF≤35%且QRS波群窄的患者进行回顾性队列研究。评估基线变量与GDMT治疗后LVEF改善及LVEF绝对变化(∆LVEF)之间的关联。Cox比例风险模型评估GDMT治疗后LVEF状态与不良心脏事件之间的关联。
70例患者中,中位随访时间97.5天(四分位间距,84 - 121天)后,31例(44%)患者GDMT治疗后LVEF≤35%。在最终多变量模型中,与正常左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)相比,严重扩张的LVEDD强烈预测GDMT治疗后LVEF≤35%(比值比,7.77;95%置信区间[CI],1.39 - 43.49;p = 0.02)及∆LVEF(β = -15.709;标准误 = 4.622;p = 0.001)。GDMT治疗后LVEF≤35%的患者在中位随访时间970.5天内发生不良心脏事件的可能性更高(未调整风险比,2.15;95% CI,0.93 - 4.96;p = 0.07)。在GDMT治疗后LVEF≤35%的组中,26例患者中有9例(35%)长期LVEF>35%。
在新发性NICM伴窄QRS波群中,非扩张的LVEDD预测早期LVEF改善。GDMT治疗后LVEF≤35%的患者发生不良心脏事件的风险较高,但相当一部分患者显示长期LVEF持续改善。