Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.
RAND Center for Causal Inference, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
Addiction. 2017 Oct;112(10):1784-1796. doi: 10.1111/add.13860. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) are a principal strategy used in the United States to address prescription drug abuse. We (1) compared opioid use pre- and post-PDMP implementation and (2) estimated differences of PDMP impact by reason for Medicare eligibility and plan type.
Analysis of opioid prescription claims in US states that implemented PDMPs relative to non-PDMP states during 2007-12.
Florida, Louisiana, Nebraska, New Jersey, Vermont, Georgia, Wisconsin, Maryland, New Hampshire and Arkansas, USA.
A total of 310 105 disabled and older adult Medicare enrolees.
Primary outcomes were monthly total opioid volume, mean daily morphine milligram equivalent (MME) dose per prescription and number of opioid prescriptions dispensed. The key predictors were PDMP status and time. Tests for moderation examined PDMP impact by Medicare eligibility (disability versus age) and drug plan [privately provided Medicare Advantage (MAPD) versus fee-for-service (PDP)].
Overall, PDMP implementation was associated with reduced opioid volume [-2.36 kg/month, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -3.44, -1.28] and no changes in mean MMEs or opioid prescriptions 12 months after implementation compared with non-PDMP states. We found evidence of strong moderation effects. In PDMP states, estimated monthly opioid volumes decreased 1.67 kg (95% CI = -2.38, -0.96) and 0.75 kg (95% CI = -1.32, -0.18) among disabled and older adults, respectively, and 1.2 kg, regardless of plan type. MME reductions were 3.73 mg/prescription (95% CI = -6.22, -1.24) in disabled and 3.02 mg/prescription (95% CI = -3.86, -2.18) in MAPD beneficiaries, but there were no changes in older adults and PDP beneficiaries. Dispensed prescriptions increased 259/month (95% CI = 39, 479) among the disabled and decreased 610/month (95% CI = -953, -257) among MAPD beneficiaries.
Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) are associated with reductions in opioid use, measured by volume, among disabled and older adult Medicare beneficiaries in the United States compared with states that do not have PDMPs. PDMP impact on daily doses and daily prescriptions varied by reason for eligibility and plan type. These findings cannot be generalized beyond the 10 US states studied.
处方药物监测计划(PDMP)是美国解决处方药物滥用问题的主要策略之一。我们(1)比较了 PDMP 实施前后的阿片类药物使用情况,(2)通过医疗保险资格和计划类型来估计 PDMP 影响的差异。
对美国佛罗里达州、路易斯安那州、内布拉斯加州、新泽西州、佛蒙特州、佐治亚州、威斯康星州、马里兰州、新罕布什尔州和阿肯色州在 2007-12 年期间实施 PDMP 的州与非 PDMP 州的阿片类药物处方索赔进行分析。
美国佛罗里达州、路易斯安那州、内布拉斯加州、新泽西州、佛蒙特州、佐治亚州、威斯康星州、马里兰州、新罕布什尔州和阿肯色州。
共有 310105 名残疾和老年医疗保险参保者。
主要结果是每月总阿片类药物用量、每处方平均吗啡毫克当量(MME)剂量和阿片类药物处方数量。主要预测因素是 PDMP 状态和时间。对调节作用的检验考察了 PDMP 对医疗保险资格(残疾与年龄)和药物计划[私人提供的医疗保险优势(MAPD)与收费服务(PDP)]的影响。
总体而言,与非 PDMP 州相比,PDMP 实施后 12 个月内,阿片类药物用量每月减少[2.36kg,95%置信区间(CI)=-3.44,-1.28],平均 MME 或阿片类药物处方无变化。我们发现了强烈的调节效应的证据。在 PDMP 州,残疾人和老年人的每月阿片类药物用量分别减少了 1.67kg(95%CI=-2.38,-0.96)和 0.75kg(95%CI=-1.32,-0.18),无论计划类型如何,均减少了 1.2kg。残疾人和 MAPD 受益人的 MME 减少分别为 3.73mg/处方(95%CI=-6.22,-1.24)和 3.02mg/处方(95%CI=-3.86,-2.18),但老年人和 PDP 受益人的 MME 没有变化。残疾人和 MAPD 受益人的处方数量分别增加了 259/月(95%CI=39,479)和减少了 610/月(95%CI=-953,-257)。
与没有 PDMP 的州相比,在美国,PDMP 与残疾和老年医疗保险受益人的阿片类药物使用量(以用量衡量)减少有关。PDMP 对每日剂量和每日处方的影响因资格和计划类型而异。这些发现不能推广到我们研究的 10 个美国州之外。