• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者的健康效用报告

Health utility reporting in chronic rhinosinusitis patients.

作者信息

Bewick J, Morris S, Hopkins C, Erskine S, Philpott C M

机构信息

James Paget University Hospital, Gorleston, UK.

University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Feb;43(1):90-95. doi: 10.1111/coa.12903. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1111/coa.12903
PMID:28498517
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Direct comparison of different diseases allows clinicians and researchers to place the burden of symptoms and impact on quality of life of each condition in context. Generic health-related quality-of-life assessment tools allow such analysis, and limited data are available for British patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.

DESIGN

As part of a larger feasibility study, patients underwent baseline assessment using the SNOT-22, SF-12 and EQ-5D-5L tools. Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel and algorithms available for the analysis of the later two tools. We plotted EQ-5D-5L VAS and utility scores and SF-12 MCS and PCS scores separately against SNOT-22 scores and quantified associations using bivariate ordinary least squares regression analysis.

SETTING

Patients were prospectively recruited from six UK outpatient clinics.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNPs).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Baseline SNOT-22, SF-12 and EQ-5D-5L scores.

RESULTS

Fifty-two adults were recruited with a mean age of 55 years, 51% were male. The mean SNOT-22 score was 43.82. Mental and physical component scores of the SF-12 were 46.53 and 46, respectively. Mean index score computed form the EQ-5D-5L was 0.75. Worse (higher) SNOT-22 scores were associated with lower EQ-5D-5L VAS and utility scores and SF-12 MCS and PCS scores.

CONCLUSION

The EQ-5D-5L suggests that British CRSsNPs patients are negatively impacted with regards to quality of life. We found the SF-12 to be less sensitive and conclude that the EQ-5D-5L tool is a quick and accessible method for assessing QOL in order it can be compared with other disease states.

摘要

目的

对不同疾病进行直接比较,有助于临床医生和研究人员了解每种疾病的症状负担及其对生活质量的影响。通用的健康相关生活质量评估工具可用于此类分析,但针对英国慢性鼻窦炎患者的相关数据有限。

设计

作为一项更大规模可行性研究的一部分,患者使用SNOT - 22、SF - 12和EQ - 5D - 5L工具进行基线评估。使用Microsoft Excel和可用于分析后两种工具的算法对数据进行分析。我们分别绘制了EQ - 5D - 5L视觉模拟量表(VAS)和效用得分以及SF - 12心理成分总结(MCS)和生理成分总结(PCS)得分与SNOT - 22得分的关系图,并使用双变量普通最小二乘法回归分析对关联进行量化。

地点

从英国六个门诊诊所前瞻性招募患者。

参与者

无鼻息肉的慢性鼻窦炎成年患者(CRSsNP)。

主要观察指标

基线SNOT - 22、SF - 12和EQ - 5D - 5L得分。

结果

招募了52名成年人,平均年龄55岁,51%为男性。SNOT - 22平均得分为43.82。SF - 其心理和生理成分得分分别为46.53和46。从EQ - 5D - 5L计算得出的平均指数得分为0.75。更高的SNOT - 22得分与更低的EQ - 5D - 5L VAS和效用得分以及SF - 12 MCS和PCS得分相关。

结论

EQ - 5D - 5L表明英国CRSsNP患者的生活质量受到负面影响。我们发现SF - 12的敏感性较低,并得出结论,EQ - 5D - 5L工具是一种快速且易于使用的生活质量评估方法,以便能够与其他疾病状态进行比较。

相似文献

1
Health utility reporting in chronic rhinosinusitis patients.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者的健康效用报告
Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Feb;43(1):90-95. doi: 10.1111/coa.12903. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
2
The EQ-5D: a new tool for studying clinical outcomes in chronic rhinosinusitis.EQ-5D:一种用于研究慢性鼻-鼻窦炎临床结局的新工具。
Laryngoscope. 2015 Jan;125(1):7-15. doi: 10.1002/lary.24715. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
3
Depressed Mood Modulates Impact of Chronic Rhinosinusitis Symptoms on Quality of Life.抑郁情绪调节慢性鼻-鼻窦炎症状对生活质量的影响。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Nov-Dec;6(6):2098-2105. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.04.034. Epub 2018 May 8.
4
Comparison of EQ-5D-5L, VAS, and SF-6D in Thai Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis.泰国腹膜透析患者中EQ-5D-5L、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和SF-6D的比较
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 May;18:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
5
EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation.症状性良性甲状腺结节的 EQ-5D-5L 和 SF-6D 效用测量:可接受性和心理测量评估。
Patient. 2017 Aug;10(4):447-454. doi: 10.1007/s40271-017-0220-5.
6
Unbiased Measure of General Quality of Life in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Reveals Disease Modifiers.客观评估慢性鼻-鼻窦炎患者的总体生活质量可揭示疾病修饰因素。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jun;131(6):1206-1211. doi: 10.1002/lary.29139. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
7
Establishing utility values for the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) using a crosswalk to the EuroQol-five-dimensional questionnaire-three-level version (EQ-5D-3L).采用与欧洲五维健康量表 3 级版本(EQ-5D-3L)的转换标度建立 22 项鼻-鼻窦结局测试(SNOT-22)的效用值。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017 May;7(5):480-487. doi: 10.1002/alr.21917. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
8
Mapping the SRS-22r questionnaire onto the EQ-5D-5L utility score in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.将SRS-22r问卷映射到青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的EQ-5D-5L效用评分上。
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 17;12(4):e0175847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175847. eCollection 2017.
9
A Head-to-Head Comparison of UK SF-6D and Thai and UK EQ-5D-5L Value Sets in Thai Patients with Chronic Diseases.英国 SF-6D 量表与泰国和英国 EQ-5D-5L 量表在泰国慢性病患者中的头对头比较。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Oct;15(5):669-679. doi: 10.1007/s40258-017-0320-3.
10
Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.《腰痛患者欧洲五维健康量表 5 维度 5 水平版与六维度简短量表效用测量的差异心理测量学特性》
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Jun 1;44(11):E679-E686. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002939.

引用本文的文献

1
Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Different Diseases Measured With the EQ-5D-5L: A Systematic Review.采用 EQ-5D-5L 量表测量不同疾病患者的健康相关生活质量:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 29;9:675523. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.675523. eCollection 2021.
2
Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature.EQ-5D-5L 的心理测量特性:文献系统综述。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):647-673. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
3
Impact of odontogenic chronic rhinosinusitis on general health-related quality of life.
牙源性慢性鼻-鼻窦炎对一般健康相关生活质量的影响。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Jun;275(6):1477-1482. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4977-5. Epub 2018 Apr 17.