Arantes Mavilde, Barbosa Joselina, Ferreira Maria Amélia
Department of Anatomy. Faculty of Medicine. University of Porto. Porto. Portugal.
Department of Medical Education and Simulation. Faculty of Medicine. University of Porto. Porto. Portugal.
Acta Med Port. 2017 Jan 31;30(1):26-33. doi: 10.20344/amp.7307.
On the subject of curriculum reform, most European medical schools are moving away from an educational approach consisting of discipline-based courses to an integrated curriculum. The aim of this study was to compare, in the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Portugal, the teaching of neuroanatomy in a medical curriculum organized by disciplines and in an integrated medical curriculum.
Two hundred sixty one students who completed the Curricular Unit with a discipline-based approach (Neuroanatomy) and 202 students who completed it with an integrated approach (Morphophysiology of the Nervous System) were asked to complete a questionnaire on their perceptions about the Curricular Unit.
Our study showed that students of the Curricular Unit with a discipline-based approach had higher grades and evaluated it higher than students who followed the integrated approach. However, it also showed that students' grades had a significant effect on the evaluation of the curricular unit, with students with higher grades evaluating higher than students with lower grades. Besides, the majority of the students of the Curricular Unit with an integrated approach appreciated this curriculum model and highlighted as a positive point the successful integration of contents covered in the three components of the curricular unit.
The curriculum reform led to the integration of neuroanatomy with other disciplines and resulted in a reduction of the teaching hours, a redefinition of the syllabus contents and the students' learning objectives, the introduction of new educational methods and changes in the evaluation system.
Our study could not prove conclusively the supremacy of one pedagogic approach to neuroanatomy over the other. Future initiatives to explore different pedagogical models in medical education are needed and should be of major concern to the medical faculty.
关于课程改革,大多数欧洲医学院校正从基于学科课程的教育方法转向综合课程。本研究的目的是在葡萄牙波尔图大学医学院比较在按学科组织的医学课程和综合医学课程中神经解剖学的教学情况。
邀请261名以基于学科的方法完成课程单元(神经解剖学)的学生和202名以综合方法完成课程单元(神经系统形态生理学)的学生填写一份关于他们对该课程单元看法的问卷。
我们的研究表明,以基于学科的方法学习课程单元的学生成绩更高,对其评价也高于采用综合方法的学生。然而,研究还表明,学生成绩对课程单元评价有显著影响,成绩高的学生评价高于成绩低的学生。此外,采用综合方法学习课程单元的大多数学生欣赏这种课程模式,并将课程单元三个组成部分所涵盖内容的成功整合作为一个积极点加以强调。
课程改革导致神经解剖学与其他学科整合,教学时数减少,教学大纲内容和学生学习目标重新定义,引入了新的教育方法并改变了评价体系。
我们的研究无法确凿证明一种神经解剖学教学方法优于另一种。未来需要在医学教育中探索不同教学模式的举措,这应是医学院校主要关注的问题。