Lozoya-Agullo Isabel, Zur Moran, Fine-Shamir Noa, Markovic Milica, Cohen Yael, Porat Daniel, González-Álvarez Isabel, González-Álvarez Marta, Merino-Sanjuán Matilde, Bermejo Marival, Dahan Arik
Department of Engineering, Pharmacy Section, Miguel Hernandez University, Alicante, Spain; Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology and Parasitology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Int J Pharm. 2017 Jul 15;527(1-2):135-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.05.018. Epub 2017 May 10.
Traditionally, the colon is considered a secondary intestinal segment in the drug absorption process. However, in many cases the role of colonic drug permeability cannot be overlooked. The purpose of this research was to compare colon permeability data obtained using two different rat perfusion methods the single-pass intestinal perfusion (SPIP) approach and the closed-loop (Doluisio) perfusion model. A list of 14 structurally diverse model drugs was constructed, and their rat colon permeability was studied using the two methods. The two sets of results were compared to each other, and were evaluated vs. in-vitro, ex-vivo, and in-vivo literature values. The SPIP and the Doluisio results exhibited good correlation between them (R=0.81). The best correlation of both sets was obtained with transport studies across Caco-2 monolayers (R∼0.9), as well as the sigmoidal fit vs. human fraction of dose absorbed (F) data. On the other hand, Ussing chambers data, as well as lipophilicity (Log P) data, resulted in weak correlation to the in-situ results. In conclusion, the single-pass intestinal perfusion (SPIP) and the Doluisio (closed-loop) perfusion models were found to be equally convenient and useful for obtaining validated colon permeability values, although more human colonic F data are needed for a better understanding of colonic drug permeability and absorption.
传统上,结肠在药物吸收过程中被视为次要的肠道段。然而,在许多情况下,结肠药物渗透性的作用不可忽视。本研究的目的是比较使用两种不同的大鼠灌注方法(单通道肠道灌注(SPIP)方法和闭环(Doluisio)灌注模型)获得的结肠渗透性数据。构建了一份包含14种结构各异的模型药物的清单,并使用这两种方法研究了它们在大鼠结肠中的渗透性。将两组结果相互比较,并与体外、离体和体内的文献值进行评估。SPIP和Doluisio的结果之间显示出良好的相关性(R = 0.81)。两组结果与跨Caco-2单层的转运研究(R ∼
0.9)以及与人类吸收剂量分数(F)数据的S形拟合相关性最佳。另一方面,尤斯灌流小室数据以及亲脂性(Log P)数据与原位结果的相关性较弱。总之,单通道肠道灌注(SPIP)和Doluisio(闭环)灌注模型被发现对于获得经过验证的结肠渗透性值同样方便且有用,尽管需要更多的人类结肠F数据以更好地理解结肠药物渗透性和吸收。