• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系列:实用试验与真实世界证据:论文2. 研究背景、研究地点及研究者选择

Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 2. Setting, sites, and investigator selection.

作者信息

Worsley Sally D, Oude Rengerink Katrien, Irving Elaine, Lejeune Stephane, Mol Koen, Collier Sue, Groenwold Rolf H H, Enters-Weijnen Catherine, Egger Matthias, Rhodes Thomas

机构信息

Real World Evidence, GSK R&D, Gunnels Wood Road, Stevenage, Hertfordshire SG12NY, UK.

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;88:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.003
PMID:28502811
Abstract

This second article in the series on pragmatic trials describes the challenges in selection of sites for pragmatic clinical trials and the impact on validity, precision, and generalizability of the results. The selection of sites is an important factor for the successful execution of a pragmatic trial and impacts the extent to which the results are applicable to future patients in clinical practice. The first step is to define usual care and understand the heterogeneity of sites, patient demographics, disease prevalence and country choice. Next, specific site characteristics are important to consider such as interest in the objectives of the trial, the level of research experience, availability of resources, and the expected number of eligible patients. It can be advisable to support the sites with implementing the trial-related activities and minimize the additional burden that the research imposes on routine clinical practice. Health care providers should be involved in an early phase of protocol development to generate engagement and ensure an appropriate selection of sites with patients who are representative of the future drug users.

摘要

本系列关于实用试验的第二篇文章描述了实用临床试验中选择试验地点所面临的挑战,以及对结果的有效性、精确性和可推广性的影响。试验地点的选择是实用试验成功实施的一个重要因素,并且会影响结果在临床实践中适用于未来患者的程度。第一步是界定常规治疗并了解试验地点的异质性、患者人口统计学特征、疾病患病率以及国家选择。接下来,考虑特定的试验地点特征很重要,例如对试验目标的兴趣、研究经验水平、资源可用性以及符合条件的患者预期数量。支持试验地点开展与试验相关的活动,并尽量减少研究给常规临床实践带来的额外负担,这可能是明智之举。医疗保健提供者应在方案制定的早期阶段参与进来,以提高参与度,并确保恰当地选择有代表性的试验地点,这些地点的患者应能代表未来的药物使用者。

相似文献

1
Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 2. Setting, sites, and investigator selection.系列:实用试验与真实世界证据:论文2. 研究背景、研究地点及研究者选择
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;88:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 11.
2
Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 1. Introduction.系列:实用试验与真实世界证据:论文1. 引言。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Aug;88:7-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 May 24.
3
Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 3. Patient selection challenges and consequences.系列:实用试验与真实世界证据:论文3. 患者选择的挑战与后果
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;89:173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.021. Epub 2017 May 11.
4
Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 8. Data collection and management.系列:实用临床试验和真实世界证据:第 8 篇论文。数据收集和管理。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;91:13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
5
Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 5. Usual care and real life comparators.系列:实用试验与真实世界证据:论文5.常规护理与现实生活对照物
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:92-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
6
Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 6. Outcome measures in the real world.系列:实用试验与真实世界证据:论文6. 真实世界中的结局指标
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;90:99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.12.022. Epub 2017 May 11.
7
Series: Pragmatic trials and real world evidence: Paper 7. Safety, quality and monitoring.系列文章:实用临床试验和真实世界证据:第 7 篇。安全性、质量和监测。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;91:6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 11.
8
Pragmatic trial design elements showed a different impact on trial interpretation and feasibility than explanatory elements.与解释性要素相比,实用性试验设计要素对试验解读和可行性的影响有所不同。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Sep;77:95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.04.010. Epub 2016 May 7.
9
Use of PRECIS ratings in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory.国立卫生研究院(NIH)医疗保健系统研究协作实验室中PRECIS评级的使用。
Trials. 2016 Jan 16;17:32. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1158-y.
10
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中动脉内脑溶栓的试验设计与报告标准。
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel approaches to recruiting clinical sites for embedded pragmatic clinical trials: Insights from the AIM-back trial.为嵌入式实用临床试验招募临床站点的新方法:来自AIM-back试验的见解。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2025 Apr 11;45:101483. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2025.101483. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Active and Reactive Mattresses in Pressure Injury Healing for Older People in Their Own Homes: A Pragmatic Equivalence Randomised-Controlled Study.主动式和反应式床垫对居家老年人压力性损伤愈合的比较效果:一项实用等效性随机对照研究
Nurs Rep. 2025 Mar 19;15(3):111. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15030111.
3
Statistical Considerations for the Design and Analysis of Pragmatic Trials in Aging Research.
衰老研究中实用性试验设计与分析的统计学考量
Geriatrics (Basel). 2024 Jun 4;9(3):75. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics9030075.
4
Methods for pragmatic randomized clinical trials of pain therapies: IMMPACT statement.疼痛治疗实用随机临床试验方法:IMMPACT声明
Pain. 2024 Oct 1;165(10):2165-2183. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003249. Epub 2024 May 3.
5
Assessment of the implementation context in preparation for a clinical study of machine-learning algorithms to automate the classification of digital cervical images for cervical cancer screening in resource-constrained settings.在资源受限环境下,为开展一项关于使用机器学习算法自动分类数字宫颈图像以进行宫颈癌筛查的临床研究做准备时,对实施背景进行评估。
Front Health Serv. 2022 Sep 12;2:1000150. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.1000150. eCollection 2022.
6
Patient and healthcare professional experiences of the Salford Lung Studies: qualitative insights for future effectiveness trials.患者和医疗保健专业人员对索尔福德肺部研究的体验:对未来有效性试验的定性洞察。
Trials. 2020 Sep 17;21(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04655-x.
7
A Society of General Internal Medicine Position Statement on the Internists' Role in Social Determinants of Health.普通内科医学协会关于内科医生在健康的社会决定因素中作用的立场声明。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2721-2727. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05934-8. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
8
Real-World Data and Randomised Controlled Trials: The Salford Lung Study.真实世界数据与随机对照试验:索尔福德肺研究。
Adv Ther. 2020 Mar;37(3):977-997. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-01192-1. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
9
Pragmatic Trials in Genomic Medicine: The Integrating Pharmacogenetics In Clinical Care (I-PICC) Study.基因组医学中的实用临床试验:整合药物基因组学于临床照护(I-PICC)研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Mar;13(2):381-390. doi: 10.1111/cts.12723. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
10
Clinical effectiveness of once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol in usual practice: the COPD INTREPID study design.每日一次糠酸氟替卡松/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗在常规治疗中的临床疗效:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)INTREPID研究设计
ERJ Open Res. 2019 Nov 4;5(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00061-2019. eCollection 2019 Oct.