Boswell James F, Cain Nicole M, Oswald Jennifer M, McAleavey Andrew A, Adelman Robert
Department of Psychology, University at Albany-SUNY.
Department of Psychology, Long Island University-Brooklyn.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Jul;85(7):676-688. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000219. Epub 2017 May 15.
Partnerships between mental health care stakeholders provide a context for generalizable clinical research with implications for quality improvement. In the context of a partnership between an adolescent residential substance abuse disorder (SUD) treatment center and clinical researchers, stakeholders identified knowledge gaps (internal and the field broadly) with regard to patient interpersonal factors that influence working alliance and acute SUD residential treatment outcome trajectories.
To (a) examine interpersonal pathoplasticity and identify interpersonal subtypes in a naturalistic sample of adolescent and young-adult patients presenting for routine residential SUD treatment and (b) investigate the association between identified interpersonal subtypes and working alliance and acute treatment outcome trajectories.
N = 100 patients (Mage = 17.39 years, 68% male, 84% White) completed self-reports of symptom and functioning outcomes, interpersonal problems, and the working alliance on multiple occasions between admission and discharge. Multiple methods were used to identify interpersonal subtypes and test pathoplasticity. Interpersonal subtype was entered as a predictor in respective multilevel models of working alliance and symptom outcome.
Interpersonal subtypes of vindictive and exploitable patients demonstrated pathoplasticity. Subtype did not predict working alliance trajectories; however, a significant interaction between interpersonal subtype and a quadratic effect for time demonstrated that exploitable patients with longer than average treatment lengths experienced attenuated symptom change over the course of treatment whereas vindictive patients appeared to demonstrate steady progress.
Interpersonal assessments should be integrated into residential SUD treatment to identify patients with an exploitable interpersonal style who might require additional attention or alternative interventions. (PsycINFO Database Record
精神卫生保健利益相关者之间的伙伴关系为可推广的临床研究提供了背景,对质量改进具有重要意义。在一家青少年住院药物滥用障碍(SUD)治疗中心与临床研究人员的伙伴关系背景下,利益相关者发现了关于影响工作联盟和急性SUD住院治疗结果轨迹的患者人际因素方面的知识空白(内部和整个领域)。
(a)在寻求常规住院SUD治疗的青少年和青年患者的自然样本中检查人际可塑性并识别人际亚型,以及(b)研究已识别的人际亚型与工作联盟和急性治疗结果轨迹之间的关联。
N = 100名患者(年龄中位数 = 17.39岁,68%为男性,84%为白人)在入院和出院之间多次完成了症状和功能结果、人际问题以及工作联盟的自我报告。使用多种方法来识别人际亚型并测试可塑性。人际亚型作为预测变量纳入工作联盟和症状结果的各自多层次模型中。
报复性和可利用型患者的人际亚型表现出可塑性。亚型并未预测工作联盟轨迹;然而,人际亚型与时间的二次效应之间的显著交互作用表明,治疗时间长于平均水平的可利用型患者在治疗过程中症状变化减弱,而报复性患者似乎表现出稳步进展。
人际评估应纳入住院SUD治疗,以识别可能需要额外关注或替代干预措施的具有可利用人际风格的患者。(PsycINFO数据库记录