Montero-Odasso Manuel M, Sarquis-Adamson Yanina, Speechley Mark, Borrie Michael J, Hachinski Vladimir C, Wells Jennie, Riccio Patricia M, Schapira Marcelo, Sejdic Ervin, Camicioli Richard M, Bartha Robert, McIlroy William E, Muir-Hunter Susan
Gait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute and Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada2Schulich School of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada3Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Gait and Brain Lab, Parkwood Institute and Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Jul 1;74(7):857-865. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0643.
Gait performance is affected by neurodegeneration in aging and has the potential to be used as a clinical marker for progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia. A dual-task gait test evaluating the cognitive-motor interface may predict dementia progression in older adults with MCI.
To determine whether a dual-task gait test is associated with incident dementia in MCI.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Gait and Brain Study is an ongoing prospective cohort study of community-dwelling older adults that enrolled 112 older adults with MCI. Participants were followed up for 6 years, with biannual visits including neurologic, cognitive, and gait assessments. Data were collected from July 2007 to March 2016.
Incident all-cause dementia was the main outcome measure, and single- and dual-task gait velocity and dual-task gait costs were the independent variables. A neuropsychological test battery was used to assess cognition. Gait velocity was recorded under single-task and 3 separate dual-task conditions using an electronic walkway. Dual-task gait cost was defined as the percentage change between single- and dual-task gait velocities: ([single-task gait velocity - dual-task gait velocity]/ single-task gait velocity) × 100. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between risk of progression to dementia and the independent variables, adjusted for age, sex, education, comorbidities, and cognition.
Among 112 study participants with MCI, mean (SD) age was 76.6 (6.9) years, 55 were women (49.1%), and 27 progressed to dementia (24.1%), with an incidence rate of 121 per 1000 person-years. Slow single-task gait velocity (<0.8 m/second) was not associated with progression to dementia (hazard ratio [HR], 3.41; 95% CI, 0.99-11.71; P = .05)while high dual-task gait cost while counting backward (HR, 3.79; 95% CI, 1.57-9.15; P = .003) and naming animals (HR, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.04-5.59; P = .04) were associated with dementia progression (incidence rate, 155 per 1000 person-years). The models remained robust after adjusting by baseline cognition except for dual-task gait cost when dichotomized.
Dual-task gait is associated with progression to dementia in patients with MCI. Dual-task gait testing is easy to administer and may be used by clinicians to decide further biomarker testing, preventive strategies, and follow-up planning in patients with MCI.
clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03020381.
步态表现会受到衰老过程中神经退行性变的影响,并且有可能用作从轻度认知障碍(MCI)进展至痴呆的临床标志物。一项评估认知 - 运动界面的双任务步态测试可能预测患有MCI的老年人的痴呆进展情况。
确定双任务步态测试是否与MCI患者发生痴呆相关。
设计、设置和参与者:步态与大脑研究是一项正在进行的针对社区居住老年人的前瞻性队列研究,招募了112名患有MCI的老年人。对参与者进行了6年的随访,每半年进行一次包括神经学、认知和步态评估的访视。数据收集时间为2007年7月至2016年3月。
全因性痴呆的发生是主要结局指标,单任务和双任务步态速度以及双任务步态成本是自变量。使用一套神经心理学测试来评估认知。使用电子步道在单任务和3种不同的双任务条件下记录步态速度。双任务步态成本定义为单任务和双任务步态速度之间的百分比变化:([单任务步态速度 - 双任务步态速度]/单任务步态速度)×100。使用Cox比例风险模型来估计进展为痴呆的风险与自变量之间的关联,并对年龄、性别、教育程度、合并症和认知进行了调整。
在112名患有MCI的研究参与者中,平均(标准差)年龄为76.6(6.9)岁,55名是女性(49.1%),27名进展为痴呆(24.1%),发病率为每1000人年121例。单任务步态速度慢(<0.8米/秒)与进展为痴呆无关(风险比[HR],3.41;95%置信区间,0.99 - 11.71;P = .05),而倒着数数时双任务步态成本高(HR,3.79;95%置信区间,1.57 - 9.15;P = .003)以及说出动物名称时(HR,2.41;95%置信区间,1.04 - 5.59;P = .04)与痴呆进展相关(发病率为每1000人年155例)。除了双任务步态成本二分法调整后,在根据基线认知进行调整后模型仍然稳健。
双任务步态与MCI患者进展为痴呆相关。双任务步态测试易于实施,临床医生可用于决定对MCI患者进行进一步的生物标志物检测、预防策略和随访计划。
clinicaltrials.gov:NCT03020381。