Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark.
Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, Denmark.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:186-191. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.05.028. Epub 2017 May 10.
Supraventricular ectopic complexes (SVEC) originating in the pulmonary veins are known triggers of atrial fibrillation (AF) which led to the development of pulmonary vein isolation for AF. However, the long-term prevalence of SVEC after catheter ablation (CA) as compared to antiarrhythmic medication (AAD) is unknown. Our aims were to compare the prevalence of SVEC after AAD and CA and to estimate the association between baseline SVEC burden and AF burden during 24months of follow-up.
Patients with paroxysmal AF (N=260) enrolled in the MANTRA PAF trial were treated with AAD (N=132) or CA (N=128). At baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24months follow-up patients underwent 7-day Holter monitoring to assess SVEC and AF burden. We compared SVEC burden between treatments with Wilcoxon sum rank test.
Patients treated with AAD had significantly lower daily SVEC burden during follow-up as compared to CA (AAD: 19 [6-58] versus CA: 39 [14-125], p=0.003). SVEC burden increased post-procedurally followed by a decrease after CA whereas after AAD SVEC burden decreased and stabilized after 3months of follow-up. Patients with low SVEC burden had low AF burden after both treatments albeit this was more pronounced after CA at 24months of follow-up.
AAD was superior to CA in suppressing SVEC burden after treatment of paroxysmal AF. After CA SVEC burden increased immediately post-procedural followed by a decrease whereas after AAD an early decrease was observed. Lower SVEC burden was highly associated with lower AF burden during follow-up especially after CA.
起源于肺静脉的室上性异位复合波(SVEC)是心房颤动(AF)的已知触发因素,这导致了肺静脉隔离术用于 AF。然而,与抗心律失常药物(AAD)相比,导管消融(CA)后 SVEC 的长期发生率尚不清楚。我们的目的是比较 AAD 和 CA 后 SVEC 的发生率,并评估基线 SVEC 负荷与 24 个月随访期间 AF 负荷之间的相关性。
MANTRA PAF 试验中纳入了 260 例阵发性 AF 患者,他们接受了 AAD(n=132)或 CA(n=128)治疗。在基线和 3、6、12、18 和 24 个月的随访中,患者接受了 7 天动态心电图监测,以评估 SVEC 和 AF 负荷。我们使用 Wilcoxon 总和秩检验比较了两种治疗方法之间的 SVEC 负荷。
与 CA 相比,接受 AAD 治疗的患者在随访期间的每日 SVEC 负荷显著降低(AAD:19 [6-58] 与 CA:39 [14-125],p=0.003)。CA 后 SVEC 负荷增加,随后在 CA 后降低,而在 AAD 后 SVEC 负荷降低并在随访 3 个月后稳定。尽管在 24 个月的随访中,CA 后更为明显,但接受两种治疗方法后,SVEC 负荷低的患者的 AF 负荷也低。
在治疗阵发性 AF 时,AAD 在抑制 SVEC 负荷方面优于 CA。CA 后 SVEC 负荷立即增加,随后降低,而 AAD 后则观察到早期降低。较低的 SVEC 负荷与随访期间较低的 AF 负荷高度相关,尤其是在 CA 后。