Ahmed N, Greenberg P
Department of Surgery, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ, USA.
Office of Research Administration, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, NJ, USA.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Feb;45(1):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0794-6. Epub 2017 May 15.
To examine the outcomes of trauma patients who tested positive for alcohol at the time of hospital arrival versus those who tested negative.
Data were pulled from the National Trauma Data Bank (2007-2010). All injured patients who were ≥14 years of age, sustained a "blunt" or "penetrating" injury, had complete systolic blood pressure (SBP) and heart rate (HR) records, were taken to a level 1 or 2 trauma center, and who received a confirmed blood alcohol test were included in the study. Any blood alcohol concentration (BAC) above the legal limit (≥0.08 g/dL) was considered "positive" for alcohol, and if no alcohol was identified it was considered "negative". Patients' demography and clinical information were compared across groups using Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Logistic regression, propensity score matching, and a follow-up paired analysis were also performed.
Of 279,460 total patients, around one-third of the patients (92,960) tested positive for BAC. There were clear demographic differences found between the two groups regarding age, gender, race, and injury type. There was also a significantly higher mortality rate (4.3 vs. 3.1%, P < 0.001) and a longer hospital length of stay (4 vs. 3 days, P < 0.001) found in the alcohol-negative group. Propensity score matching was also performed resulting in 92,959 patients per group. Using the paired data, the overall mortality observed was 3.1 vs. 3.3% (P = 0.035) between the alcohol-positive and alcohol-negative groups, respectively. There was no significant difference noted in the total hospital length of stay (median: 3 vs. 4 days, P = 0.84).
Patients who tested positive for alcohol following a traumatic injury showed no clinically significant reduction in mortality and no significant difference in total hospital length of stay.
比较入院时酒精检测呈阳性的创伤患者与检测呈阴性的创伤患者的治疗结果。
数据取自国家创伤数据库(2007 - 2010年)。所有年龄≥14岁、遭受“钝性”或“穿透性”损伤、有完整的收缩压(SBP)和心率(HR)记录、被送往一级或二级创伤中心且接受了确诊酒精检测的受伤患者均纳入本研究。任何高于法定限度(≥0.08 g/dL)的血液酒精浓度(BAC)被视为酒精检测“阳性”,若未检测到酒精则视为“阴性”。采用卡方检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验对两组患者的人口统计学和临床信息进行比较。还进行了逻辑回归、倾向评分匹配和随访配对分析。
在总共279,460例患者中,约三分之一的患者(92,960例)BAC检测呈阳性。两组在年龄、性别、种族和损伤类型方面存在明显的人口统计学差异。酒精检测阴性组的死亡率也显著更高(4.3%对3.1%,P < 0.001),住院时间更长(4天对3天,P < 0.001)。进行倾向评分匹配后,每组有92,959例患者。使用配对数据,酒精阳性组和酒精阴性组的总体死亡率分别为3.1%对3.3%(P = 0.035)。住院总时长无显著差异(中位数:3天对4天,P = 0.84)。
创伤后酒精检测呈阳性的患者在死亡率方面没有临床显著降低,住院总时长也没有显著差异。