Hagen H S, Green K F
Psychology Department, California State University, Long Beach 90840.
Behav Neurosci. 1988 Dec;102(6):906-14. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.102.6.906.
Controversy exists as to whether conditioned stress-induced analgesia (CSIA) utilizes opioid or nonopioid mechanisms. In two experiments, both an anticipatory conditioned stimulus (CS) and a shock-associated CS were used. The duration of exposure to the anticipatory CS was long, as in studies reporting opioid CSIA, whereas the duration of the shock-associated CS was short, as in studies reporting nonopioid CSIA. In addition, the effects of unconditioned stimulus (UCS) strength were investigated by using three levels of footshock (no, moderate, and high), and the development of CSIA was monitored by using different levels of training (1 to 6 days). CSIA, measured in both anticipatory and postexposure test periods, was found to be relatively stable across tail-flick trials within days and insensitive to strength of shock. As training progressed, CSIA increased with repeated CS-UCS pairings. We tested for opioid involvement using naloxone and found opioid and nonopioid mechanisms underlying CSIA; these mechanisms combined to form a stable level of analgesia. Our data suggest that stress level and amount of training interact to activate opioid and nonopioid mechanisms of CSIA. Apparent discrepancies in previous studies regarding naloxone sensitivity of CSIA may therefore be attributable to differences in stress levels, test periods and durations of exposure to shock-related cues.
关于条件性应激诱导镇痛(CSIA)是利用阿片类还是非阿片类机制存在争议。在两项实验中,既使用了预期条件刺激(CS),也使用了与电击相关的CS。对预期CS的暴露持续时间较长,如同报告阿片类CSIA的研究,而与电击相关的CS的持续时间较短,如同报告非阿片类CSIA的研究。此外,通过使用三种强度的足底电击(无、中度和高强度)来研究非条件刺激(UCS)强度的影响,并通过使用不同水平的训练(1至6天)来监测CSIA的发展。在预期和暴露后测试期测量的CSIA在数天内的甩尾试验中相对稳定,且对电击强度不敏感。随着训练的进行,CSIA随着CS-UCS配对的重复而增加。我们使用纳洛酮测试了阿片类物质的参与情况,发现CSIA存在阿片类和非阿片类机制;这些机制共同形成了稳定的镇痛水平。我们的数据表明,应激水平和训练量相互作用以激活CSIA的阿片类和非阿片类机制。因此,先前关于CSIA对纳洛酮敏感性的研究中明显的差异可能归因于应激水平、测试期以及与电击相关线索的暴露持续时间的不同。