• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

280至700克大子宫行阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验

Vaginal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri between 280 and 700 g: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Mohammed Walid E, Salama Fekrya, Tharwat Ahmed, Mohamed Ibrahim, ElMaraghy Ahmed

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Abbasia, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Jul;296(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4397-6. Epub 2017 May 15.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-017-4397-6
PMID:28508344
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical outcomes, postoperative complications and costs between vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in cases of large uteri.

METHODS

Prospective randomized controlled trial done at Ain Shams University Maternity Hospital, where 50 patients were recruited and divided into two equal groups (each 25 patients). First group underwent vaginal hysterectomy, and the second underwent laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics were similar in both groups. As for surgical outcomes, estimated intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.90), operative time (P = 0.48), preoperative hemoglobin (P = 0.09), postoperative hemoglobin (P = 0.42), and operative complications (P = 1.0) did not differ between the two groups. The hospital costs (converted from Egyptian pound to U.S. dollars) were significantly higher in case of LAVH group [VH: $1060.86 ($180.09) versus LAVH: $1560.5 ($220.57), P value <0.001]. No significant difference exists in the duration of postoperative hospital stay between the two groups [VH: 49.92 h (28.50) versus LAVH: 58.56 (27.78), P = 0.28] or the actual uterine weight measured postoperatively [VH: 350.72 g (71.78) versus LAVH: 385.96 g (172.52), P = 0.35].

CONCLUSION

Both vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy are safe procedures in cases of large uteri with no significant difference between them except in terms of costs as VH appears to be more cost effective. CLINICAL TRIALS.GOV: NCT02826304.

摘要

目的

比较阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术治疗大子宫病例的手术效果、术后并发症及费用。

方法

在艾因夏姆斯大学妇产医院进行前瞻性随机对照试验,招募50例患者并分为两组(每组25例)。第一组接受阴道子宫切除术,第二组接受腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术。

结果

两组患者特征相似。在手术效果方面,两组间估计术中失血量(P = 0.90)、手术时间(P = 0.48)、术前血红蛋白(P = 0.09)、术后血红蛋白(P = 0.42)及手术并发症(P = 1.0)无差异。腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术组的医院费用(从埃及镑换算为美元)显著更高[阴道子宫切除术:1060.86美元(180.09美元),腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术:1560.5美元(220.57美元),P值<0.001]。两组间术后住院时间[阴道子宫切除术:49.92小时(28.50小时),腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术:58.56小时(27.78小时),P = 0.28]或术后实际测量的子宫重量[阴道子宫切除术:350.72克(71.78克),腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术:385.96克(172.52克),P = 0.35]无显著差异。

结论

阴道子宫切除术和腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术治疗大子宫病例均为安全的手术方式,两者除费用外无显著差异,阴道子宫切除术似乎更具成本效益。临床试验注册编号:NCT02826304。

相似文献

1
Vaginal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri between 280 and 700 g: a randomized controlled trial.280至700克大子宫行阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Jul;296(1):77-83. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4397-6. Epub 2017 May 15.
2
[COMPARISON OF LAPAROSCOPIC ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY AND VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY FOR BENIGN DISEASES AND LESIONS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL SYSTEM].腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与阴式子宫切除术治疗女性生殖系统良性疾病及病变的比较
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2016;55 Suppl 1 Pt 1:4-10.
3
Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.子宫肌瘤患者行全腹腔镜、腹腔镜辅助阴式和阴式子宫切除术的随机对照比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;290(3):485-91. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3228-2. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
4
Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy for benign uterine diseases: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, double-blind trial (LAVA).腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与阴式子宫切除术治疗良性子宫疾病的前瞻性、随机、多中心、双盲试验(LAVA)
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Feb;297(2):479-485. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4647-7. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
5
A Randomized Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomies: Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy.腹腔镜单孔子宫切除术的随机对照比较:全腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Jul;25(7):541-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0524. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
6
The impact of obesity on vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy outcomes: A randomised control trial.肥胖对经阴道子宫切除术和腹腔镜辅助经阴道子宫切除术结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Aug;287:227-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
7
A randomized control trial comparing vaginal and laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the absence of uterine prolapse in a South African tertiary institution.一项在南非三级医疗机构中比较无子宫脱垂患者行经阴道与腹腔镜辅助经阴道子宫切除术的随机对照试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Dec;267:73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.018. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
8
Laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus: operative outcomes and the learning curve.腹腔镜辅助下经阴道子宫切除术治疗子宫增大:手术效果及学习曲线
Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(5):333-7. doi: 10.5603/GP.2016.0003.
9
A comparative study among laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy: experience in a tertiary care hospital in Bangladesh.腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术、阴式子宫切除术和腹式子宫切除术的比较研究:孟加拉国一家三级医院的经验
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(3):254-7. doi: 10.3109/01443615.2010.550346.
10
Total abdominal hysterectomy versus laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total vaginal hysterectomy.全腹子宫切除术与腹腔镜辅助阴道子宫切除术与全阴道子宫切除术的比较
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2011 Nov;4(4):161-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00104.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Different minimally invasive surgical methods to hysterectomy for benign gynecological disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.治疗良性妇科疾病的子宫切除术的不同微创手术方法:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 3;7(11):e70137. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70137. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病的子宫切除术手术入路。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6.
3
Healthcare and Indirect Cost of the Laparoscopic vs. Vaginal Approach in Benign Hysterectomy.
腹腔镜与经阴道手术治疗良性子宫切除术后的医疗保健和间接成本。
JSLS. 2022 Jul-Sep;26(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00048.
4
Evaluation of complications, conversion rate, malignancy rate, and, surgeon's experience in laparoscopic assisted supracervical hysterectomy (LASH) of 1274 large uteri: A retrospective study.评价腹腔镜辅助经宫颈子宫切除术(LASH)治疗 1274 例大子宫的并发症、中转率、恶性肿瘤发生率及术者经验:一项回顾性研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Dec;101(12):1450-1457. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14468. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
5
Comparison of vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阴道子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Womens Health. 2019 Jun 24;19(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0784-4.
6
Factors for a Successful Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Very Large Uteri.针对非常大子宫进行成功腹腔镜子宫切除术的因素
Case Rep Med. 2017;2017:1637472. doi: 10.1155/2017/1637472. Epub 2017 Sep 6.