Woods Robert A, Artz Jennifer D, Carrière Benoit, Field Simon, Huffman James, Dong Sandy L, Bhanji Farhan, Yiu Stella, Smith Sheila, Mengual Rose, Hicks Chris, Frank Jason
*Department of Emergency Medicine,University of Saskatchewan,Saskatoon,SK.
‡Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians,Ottawa,ON.
CJEM. 2017 May;19(S1):S1-S8. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.41.
To develop consensus recommendations for training future clinician educators (CEs) in emergency medicine (EM).
A panel of EM education leaders was assembled from across Canada and met regularly by teleconference over the course of 1 year. Recommendations for CE training were drafted based on the panel's experience, a literature review, and a survey of current and past EM education leaders in Canada. Feedback was sought from attendees at the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) annual academic symposium. Recommendations were distributed to the society's Academic Section for further feedback and updated by a consensus of the expert panel.
Recommendations were categorized for one of three audiences: 1) Future CEs; 2) Academic departments and divisions (AD&D) that support training to fulfill their education leadership goals; and 3) The CAEP Academic Section. Advanced medical education training is recommended for any emergency physician or resident who pursues an education leadership role. Individuals should seek out mentorship in making decisions about career opportunities and training options. AD&D should regularly perform a needs assessment of their future CE needs and identify and encourage potential individuals who fulfill education leadership roles. AD&D should develop training opportunities at their institution, provide support to complete this training, and advocate for the recognition of education scholarship in their institutional promotions process. The CAEP Academic Section should support mentorship of future CEs on a national scale.
These recommendations serve as a framework for training and supporting the next generation of Canadian EM medical educators.
为培养未来急诊医学临床教育工作者（CE）制定共识性建议。
组建了一个由加拿大各地急诊医学教育领导者组成的小组，在1年的时间里定期通过电话会议进行会面。基于该小组的经验、文献综述以及对加拿大现任和前任急诊医学教育领导者的调查，起草了CE培训建议。向加拿大急诊医师协会（CAEP）年度学术研讨会的参会者征求了反馈意见。建议被分发给该协会的学术部门以获取更多反馈，并经专家小组达成共识后进行更新。
建议针对三类受众之一进行了分类：1）未来的CE；2）支持培训以实现其教育领导目标的学术部门和科室（AD&D）；3）CAEP学术部门。建议任何追求教育领导角色的急诊医师或住院医师接受高级医学教育培训。个人在做出职业机会和培训选择的决策时应寻求指导。AD&D应定期对其未来CE的需求进行评估，识别并鼓励担任教育领导角色的潜在人员。AD&D应在其机构内开发培训机会，为完成此类培训提供支持，并在其机构晋升过程中倡导认可教育奖学金。CAEP学术部门应在全国范围内支持对未来CE的指导。
这些建议为培训和支持下一代加拿大急诊医学医学教育工作者提供了一个框架。
