• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术后恢复质量对患者麻醉和手术满意度的影响:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。

Influence of quality of recovery on patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Resuscitation, Spitalregion Rheintal Werdenberg Sarganserland, Grabs, Switzerland.

Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care Medicine and Pain Therapy, Hospital Memmingen, Germany.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2017 Sep;72(9):1088-1096. doi: 10.1111/anae.13906. Epub 2017 May 16.

DOI:10.1111/anae.13906
PMID:28510285
Abstract

Patient satisfaction and quality of recovery are important measures of quality. Whether, and to what extent, patient satisfaction is influenced by quality of recovery, however, is not clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional influence of quality of recovery on total patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery. In this prospective cohort study, we used a validated quality of recovery questionnaire and a multi-item patient satisfaction questionnaire. Patients completed the quality of recovery questionnaire pre-operatively and 24 h postoperatively. One to two weeks after discharge, a third quality of recovery questionnaire was sent out, together with the patient satisfaction questionnaire. If no response was received after 2 weeks, a reminder containing the quality of recovery and the satisfaction questionnaire were mailed. Seven hundred and thirty-four patients were consecutively assessed for eligibility. Five hundred and seventy-nine patients completed at least one questionnaire (recruitment rate 79%). Four hundred and sixty-seven patients (81%) completed all four questionnaires. The total satisfaction score was high, with a mean (SD) of 94.6 (10.7) on a 0-100 scale. Correlation analysis between quality of recovery and total patient satisfaction showed correlations of 0.2-0.3. Testing different aspects of quality of recovery in models already containing the significant factors of patient satisfaction did not improve the model fit markedly. We conclude that quality of recovery has only a marginal additional effect on total patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery.

摘要

患者满意度和康复质量是衡量医疗质量的重要指标。然而,患者满意度是否以及在何种程度上受到康复质量的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估康复质量对麻醉和手术总患者满意度的额外影响。在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们使用了经过验证的康复质量问卷和多项患者满意度问卷。患者在术前和术后 24 小时完成康复质量问卷。出院后 1 至 2 周,我们会发送第三份康复质量问卷和患者满意度问卷。如果在 2 周后未收到回复,我们会邮寄包含康复质量和满意度问卷的提醒。连续评估了 734 名符合条件的患者。579 名患者完成了至少一份问卷(招募率为 79%)。467 名患者(81%)完成了所有四份问卷。总满意度评分很高,0-100 分制的平均(SD)为 94.6(10.7)。康复质量与总患者满意度之间的相关分析显示相关性为 0.2-0.3。在已经包含患者满意度的显著因素的模型中测试康复质量的不同方面,并没有显著改善模型拟合度。我们的结论是,康复质量对麻醉和手术的总患者满意度只有微小的额外影响。

相似文献

1
Influence of quality of recovery on patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.术后恢复质量对患者麻醉和手术满意度的影响:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Anaesthesia. 2017 Sep;72(9):1088-1096. doi: 10.1111/anae.13906. Epub 2017 May 16.
2
Measuring quality of recovery-15 after day case surgery.日间手术术后恢复质量-15的测量
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):241-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev413.
3
Predictors of patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery care: a cohort study using the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale.预测患者对麻醉和手术护理满意度的因素:使用术后恢复质量量表的队列研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Mar;30(3):106-10. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328357e584.
4
Quality of recovery after anaesthesia measured with QoR-40: a prospective observational study.用QoR-40评估麻醉后恢复质量:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2016 Jul-Aug;66(4):369-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.11.010. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
5
Effect of timing on the response to postal questionnaires concerning satisfaction with anaesthesia care.时间安排对关于麻醉护理满意度的邮政问卷调查回复的影响。
Br J Anaesth. 2005 Feb;94(2):206-10. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei024. Epub 2004 Nov 12.
6
Measurement of quality of recovery in 5672 patients after anaesthesia and surgery.对5672例麻醉和手术后患者恢复质量的测量。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000 Jun;28(3):276-80. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0002800304.
7
Determining the quality and effectiveness of surgical spine care: patient satisfaction is not a valid proxy.评估脊柱外科手术质量和效果:患者满意度不能作为有效替代指标。
Spine J. 2013 Sep;13(9):1006-12. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 May 16.
8
Translation and validation of the Danish version of the postoperative quality of recovery score QoR-15.丹麦版术后恢复质量评分QoR-15的翻译与验证
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015 Aug;59(7):912-20. doi: 10.1111/aas.12525. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
9
[Patient evaluation of postoperative recovery. An evaluation of the QoR scores in 577 patients].[患者术后恢复情况评估。对577例患者的QoR评分进行评估]
Anaesthesist. 2002 Jun;51(6):463-6. doi: 10.1007/s00101-002-0322-9.
10
Patient reported outcome of adult perioperative anaesthesia in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional observational study.英国成人围手术期麻醉的患者报告结局:一项横断面观察性研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun 12;117(6):758-766. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew381.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating a targeted person-centred pain management intervention programme in lumbar spine surgery - a controlled segment-specific before-and-after interventional design.评价腰椎手术中靶向的以患者为中心的疼痛管理干预方案:一项对照性分段特定的干预前后设计
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 8;24(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10769-8.
2
Patient satisfaction with divided anesthesia care.患者对分段式麻醉护理的满意度。
Anaesthesiologie. 2023 Feb;72(2):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s00101-022-01192-x. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
3
Efficacy of High-Quality Nursing Service for the Patients during the Anesthesia Recovery Period: A Meta-Analysis.
优质护理服务对麻醉恢复期患者的疗效:一项Meta分析。
Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 Aug 8;2022:3528915. doi: 10.1155/2022/3528915. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparing propofol anaesthesia guided by Bispectral Index monitoring and frontal EEG wave analysis with standard monitoring in laparoscopic surgery: protocol for the 'EEG in General Anaesthesia - More Than Only a Bispectral Index' Trial, a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.比较脑电双频指数监测和额部 EEG 波分析引导下的异丙酚麻醉与标准监测在腹腔镜手术中的应用:“全身麻醉中的脑电图——不仅仅是脑电双频指数”试验方案,一项多中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 10;12(6):e059919. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059919.
5
Systematic Review of Breast-Q: A Tool to Evaluate Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.《乳房-Q系统评价:一种评估乳房切除术后乳房重建的工具》
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2021 Dec 16;13:711-724. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S256393. eCollection 2021.
6
CROATIAN VERSION OF THE QUALITY OF RECOVERY QUESTIONNAIRE (QoR-40): TRANSCULTURAL ADAPTATION AND VALIDATION.克罗地亚版健康相关生存质量问卷(QoR-40):跨文化调适与验证。
Acta Clin Croat. 2021 Jun;60(2):237-245. doi: 10.20471/acc.2021.60.02.09.
7
Relationship between inpatient satisfaction and the quality of surgery.住院患者满意度与手术质量之间的关系
Gland Surg. 2021 May;10(5):1726-1735. doi: 10.21037/gs-21-289.
8
The combinatorial use of propofol-fentanyl-ketamine for sedoanalgesia in patients undergoing urological procedures.丙泊酚-芬太尼-氯胺酮联合用于接受泌尿科手术的患者的镇静镇痛。
Saudi Med J. 2021 Jun;42(6):629-635. doi: 10.15537/smj.2021.42.6.20210071.
9
Efficacy of perioperative intravenous dexmedetomidine administration for the prevention of postoperative sore throat: a meta-analysis.围手术期静脉给予右美托咪定预防术后咽痛的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
J Int Med Res. 2021 May;49(5):3000605211017686. doi: 10.1177/03000605211017686.
10
Comparative analysis between patients undergoing Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastroplasty in a private hospital in Sao Luis-MA.在圣路易斯-马拉开波一家私立医院对接受胃旁路手术和袖状胃成形术的患者进行的对比分析。
Acta Cir Bras. 2020 May 20;35(3):e202000307. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020200030000007.