Stephens D N, Sarter M
Research Laboratories, Department of Neuropsychopharmacology, Berlin, FRG.
Psychopharmacol Ser. 1988;6:205-17. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-73288-1_15.
The classification of benzodiazepine receptor ligands into agonists, antagonists and inverse agonists is based on biochemical, electrophysiological and behavioural evidence. Agonists potentiate the effects of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and exhibit anxiolytic, anticonvulsant, hypnotic, amnesic and muscle-relaxant properties; inverse agonists show mirror-image effects in that they may be convulsant and anxiogenic and may increase muscle tone. Antagonists antagonise the effects of both agonists and inverse agonists. Some of the most interesting ligands, however, are those substances with actions intermediate between either those of the agonists and the antagonists, or between those of the antagonists and the inverse agonists. These partial agonists and partial inverse agonists possess only some of the properties of the agonists and inverse agonists, respectively. The present experiments show that the agonist and inverse agonist properties of benzodiazepine receptor ligands can also be revealed in an animal continuous attention task in which rats were required to detect a brief signal during which operation of a lever was rewarded by food. Benzodiazepines and a beta-carboline benzodiazepine receptor agonist, ZK 93423, disrupted performance of this task, as did the antimuscarinic substance, scopolamine. Another beta-carboline, ZK 91296, which has anxiolytic and anticonvulsant properties like benzodiazepines, did not affect performance of the continuous attention task, demonstrating a separation of anxiolytic and sedative properties of such substances. A partial inverse agonist beta-carboline, FG 7142, was able to antagonise the disruptive effects of scopolamine on this task, as was, to a smaller extent, the antagonist ZK 93426. These results are discussed in terms of vigilance-enhancing properties of the inverse agonist beta-carbolines, and the possibility that such vigilance-enhancing effects might contribute to improvement of performance in learning tasks.
将苯二氮䓬受体配体分为激动剂、拮抗剂和反向激动剂是基于生化、电生理和行为学证据。激动剂可增强γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)的作用,并具有抗焦虑、抗惊厥、催眠、失忆和肌肉松弛特性;反向激动剂则表现出相反的作用,它们可能会引起惊厥和焦虑,并可能增加肌张力。拮抗剂可拮抗激动剂和反向激动剂的作用。然而,一些最有趣的配体是那些作用介于激动剂与拮抗剂之间,或拮抗剂与反向激动剂之间的物质。这些部分激动剂和部分反向激动剂分别仅具有激动剂和反向激动剂的部分特性。目前的实验表明,苯二氮䓬受体配体的激动剂和反向激动剂特性也可以在一项动物持续注意力任务中显现出来,在该任务中,要求大鼠检测一个短暂信号,在此期间按压杠杆可获得食物奖励。苯二氮䓬类药物和一种β-咔啉苯二氮䓬受体激动剂ZK 93423会干扰这项任务的表现,抗毒蕈碱物质东莨菪碱也会如此。另一种β-咔啉ZK 91296,它具有与苯二氮䓬类药物类似的抗焦虑和抗惊厥特性,但并不影响持续注意力任务的表现,这表明此类物质的抗焦虑和镇静特性是分离的。一种部分反向激动剂β-咔啉FG 7142能够拮抗东莨菪碱对这项任务的干扰作用,拮抗剂ZK 93426在较小程度上也能如此。本文根据反向激动剂β-咔啉的警觉增强特性以及这种警觉增强效应可能有助于改善学习任务表现的可能性对这些结果进行了讨论。