Fowler Marsha D
University of Surrey, UK.
Nurs Ethics. 2017 May;24(3):292-304. doi: 10.1177/0969733016684581.
Modern American nursing has an extensive ethical heritage literature that extends from the 1870s to 1965 when the American Nurses Association issued a policy paper that called for moving nursing education out of hospital diploma programs and into colleges and universities. One consequence of this move was the dispersion of nursing libraries and the loss of nursing ethics textbooks, as they were largely not brought over into the college libraries. In addition to approximately 100 nursing ethics textbooks, the nursing ethics heritage literature also includes hundreds of journal articles that are often made less accessible in modern databases that concentrate on the past 20 or 30 years. A second consequence of nursing's movement into colleges and universities is that ethics was no longer taught by nursing faculty, but becomes separated and placed as a discrete ethics (later bioethics) course in departments of philosophy or theology. These courses were medically identified and rarely incorporated authentic nursing content. This shift in nursing education occurs contemporaneously with the rise of the field of bioethics. Bioethics is rapidly embraced by nursing, and as it develops within nursing, it fails to incorporate the rich ethical heritage, history, and literature of nursing prior to the development of the field of bioethics. This creates a radical disjunction in nursing's ethics; a failure to more adequately explore the moral identity of nursing; the development of an ethics with a lack of fit with nursing's ethical history, literature, and theory; a neglect of nursing's ideal of service; a diminution of the scope and richness of nursing ethics as social ethics; and a loss of nursing ethical heritage of social justice activism and education. We must reclaim nursing's rich and capacious ethics heritage literature; the history of nursing ethics matters profoundly.
现代美国护理有着丰富的伦理遗产文献,其时间跨度从19世纪70年代至1965年,当时美国护士协会发布了一份政策文件,呼吁将护理教育从医院文凭项目转移到学院和大学。这一举措的一个后果是护理图书馆的分散以及护理伦理教科书的流失,因为它们大多没有被纳入大学图书馆。除了大约100本护理伦理教科书外,护理伦理遗产文献还包括数百篇期刊文章,而这些文章在专注于过去20或30年的现代数据库中往往更难获取。护理进入学院和大学的另一个后果是,伦理不再由护理教师教授,而是被分离出来,作为一门独立的伦理学(后来是生物伦理学)课程放置在哲学或神学系。这些课程是从医学角度界定的,很少纳入真正的护理内容。护理教育的这种转变与生物伦理学领域的兴起同时发生。生物伦理学迅速被护理领域所接受,并且在护理领域发展的过程中,它没有纳入生物伦理学领域发展之前护理丰富的伦理遗产、历史和文献。这在护理伦理中造成了一种根本性的脱节;未能更充分地探索护理的道德身份;发展出一种与护理的伦理历史、文献和理论不相符的伦理学;忽视了护理的服务理想;作为社会伦理学的护理伦理的范围和丰富性的减少;以及护理社会正义行动主义和教育的伦理遗产的丧失。我们必须重新找回护理丰富而广阔的伦理遗产文献;护理伦理的历史至关重要。