• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。一项关于交替使用化疗方案CEP/MEC'与不治疗的前瞻性随机试验。

Non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A prospective randomized trial with alternating chemotherapy CEP/MEC' versus no treatment.

作者信息

Cellerino R, Tummarello D, Porfiri E, Guidi F, Isidori P, Raspugli M, Biscottini B, Fatati G

机构信息

Clinica Oncologica, Università di Ancona, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1988 Dec;24(12):1839-43. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(88)90095-8.

DOI:10.1016/0277-5379(88)90095-8
PMID:2851443
Abstract

From April 1985 to September 1987, 92 patients with advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive cytotoxic chemotherapy, Arm A (treated), or supportive care, Arm B (control). Chemotherapy consisted of the CEP combination (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 i.v. day 1; epirubicin 50 mg/m2 i.v. day 1; cisplatin 80 mg/m2 i.v. day 1) alternated every 4 weeks with the MEC' combination (methotrexate 30 mg/m2 i.v. day 1; etoposide 200 mg/m2 i.v. day 1; CCNU 70 mg/m2 per os, day 1) until progression. Eight-nine patients (44 treated and 45 controls) were eligible for survival and 77 evaluable for response (38 treated and 39 controls). Response rate was: in Arm A, 8/38 (21%) partial response, 20/38 (53%) stable disease and 10/38 (26%) progressive disease; in Arm B, 18/39 (46%) stable disease and 21/39 (54%) progressive disease. Median time to progression was 4 months (range = 1-14) for treated and 2 months (range = 1-9) for controls (P = 0.001). Median survival was 8.5 months (range = 1+ to 25) for Arm A versus 5 months (range = 1+ to 28+) for Arm B; this difference was not statistically significant (Breslow test: chi-square = 2.75, P = 0.097; Mantel-Cox: chi-square = 0.32, P = 0.56). Treatment related toxicity was gastrointestinal WHO grade 3 in 22/102 (22%) CEP courses and in 10/91 (11%) MEC' courses respectively. Other observed side-effects were not clinically important. From these data our treatment was not clearly superior to supportive care in prolonging survival. This suggests the need for the inclusion of a control group in future chemotherapeutic trials of NSCLC.

摘要

1985年4月至1987年9月,92例晚期非小细胞肺癌患者被随机分为两组,A组(治疗组)接受细胞毒性化疗,B组(对照组)接受支持性治疗。化疗方案为CEP方案(环磷酰胺500mg/m²静脉注射第1天;表柔比星50mg/m²静脉注射第1天;顺铂80mg/m²静脉注射第1天)与MEC'方案(甲氨蝶呤30mg/m²静脉注射第1天;依托泊苷200mg/m²静脉注射第1天;洛莫司汀70mg/m²口服第1天)每4周交替使用,直至病情进展。89例患者(44例治疗组和45例对照组)符合生存评估标准,77例患者(38例治疗组和39例对照组)可进行疗效评估。疗效如下:A组,8/38(21%)部分缓解,20/38(53%)病情稳定,10/38(26%)病情进展;B组,18/39(46%)病情稳定,21/39(54%)病情进展。治疗组的疾病进展中位时间为4个月(范围1 - 14个月),对照组为2个月(范围1 - 9个月)(P = 0.001)。A组的中位生存期为8.5个月(范围1 +至25个月),B组为5个月(范围1 +至28 +个月);差异无统计学意义(Breslow检验:卡方 = 2.75,P = 0.097;Mantel - Cox检验:卡方 = 0.32,P = 0.56)。治疗相关毒性方面,在CEP疗程中22/102(22%)出现WHO 3级胃肠道毒性,在MEC'疗程中10/91(11%)出现。其他观察到的副作用在临床上并不重要。从这些数据来看,我们的治疗方案在延长生存期方面并不明显优于支持性治疗。这表明在未来非小细胞肺癌化疗试验中需要纳入对照组。

相似文献

1
Non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A prospective randomized trial with alternating chemotherapy CEP/MEC' versus no treatment.非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)。一项关于交替使用化疗方案CEP/MEC'与不治疗的前瞻性随机试验。
Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1988 Dec;24(12):1839-43. doi: 10.1016/0277-5379(88)90095-8.
2
A randomized trial of alternating chemotherapy versus best supportive care in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 1991 Aug;9(8):1453-61. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.8.1453.
3
Alternated approach with local irradiation and combination chemotherapy including cisplatin or carboplatin plus epirubicin and etoposide in intermediate stage non-small cell lung cancer.局部放疗联合化疗(包括顺铂或卡铂加表柔比星和依托泊苷)交替应用于中期非小细胞肺癌。
Cancer. 1994 Oct 1;74(7):1874-81. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7<1874::aid-cncr2820740708>3.0.co;2-u.
4
Phase II trial with alternating two drug schedules, CAP/MEC', for advanced (stage III Mo/M1) non-small-cell lung cancer.针对晚期(III期M0/M1)非小细胞肺癌开展的II期试验,采用CAP/MEC'两种药物交替方案。
Tumori. 1989 Oct 31;75(5):486-8. doi: 10.1177/030089168907500518.
5
A randomized, controlled phase III study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine with etoposide (CAV-E) or teniposide (CAV-T), followed by recombinant interferon-alpha maintenance therapy or observation, in small cell lung carcinoma patients with complete responses.一项针对完全缓解的小细胞肺癌患者的随机对照III期研究,比较环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱联合依托泊苷(CAV-E)或替尼泊苷(CAV-T)治疗,随后进行重组干扰素-α维持治疗或观察的疗效。
Cancer. 1997 Dec 15;80(12):2222-9.
6
Combination of chemotherapy and recombinant alpha-interferon in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Multicentric Randomized FONICAP Trial Report. The Italian Lung Cancer Task Force.
Cancer. 1993 Nov 15;72(10):2929-35. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19931115)72:10<2929::aid-cncr2820721012>3.0.co;2-x.
7
A randomized trial fo three cisplatin-containing regimens in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a study of the Umbrian Lung Cancer Group.一项关于三种含顺铂方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的随机试验:翁布里亚肺癌研究组的研究
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1990;26(1):52-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02940294.
8
Chemotherapy of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, methotrexate, and procarbazine versus cisplatin and etoposide. A randomized study.环磷酰胺、阿霉素、甲氨蝶呤和丙卡巴肼与顺铂和依托泊苷治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的随机对照研究。
Am J Clin Oncol. 1988 Oct;11(5):566-71. doi: 10.1097/00000421-198810000-00012.
9
A randomized comparative trial of sequential versus alternating cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin and mitomycin, lomustine, and methotrexate in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.环磷酰胺、阿霉素和顺铂序贯与交替联合丝裂霉素、洛莫司汀和甲氨蝶呤治疗转移性非小细胞肺癌的随机对照试验。
J Clin Oncol. 1988 Jan;6(1):5-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1988.6.1.5.
10
Randomized study of paclitaxel-cisplatin versus cisplatin-teniposide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.紫杉醇-顺铂与顺铂-替尼泊苷治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的随机研究。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织肺癌协作组
J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jun;16(6):2133-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1998.16.6.2133.

引用本文的文献

1
Why does a higher response rate to chemotherapy correlate poorly with improved survival?
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1993;119(12):700-1. doi: 10.1007/BF01195339.
2
A randomised trial of cisplatin and vindesine versus supportive care only in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.顺铂和长春地辛联合治疗与单纯支持治疗在晚期非小细胞肺癌中的随机试验。
Br J Cancer. 1990 Apr;61(4):608-11. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1990.135.
3
Current options in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌的当前治疗选择。
Drugs. 1992;44 Suppl 4:46-59. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199200444-00006.