Department of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Drug Metabolism, Merck & Co., Inc., 2000 Galloping Hill Road, Kenilworth, NJ USA.
Quantitative Solutions, a Certara Company, Kloosterstraat 9, Oss, The Netherlands.
J Immunother Cancer. 2017 May 16;5:43. doi: 10.1186/s40425-017-0242-5. eCollection 2017.
Traditionally, most monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been dosed based on body weight because of perceived contribution of body size in pharmacokinetic variability. The same approach was used in the initial pembrolizumab studies; however, following availability of PK data, the need for weight-based dosing for pembrolizumab was reassessed.
A previously established population PK (popPK) model as well as exposure-response results from patients with advanced melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were used to evaluate the potential application of a fixed dosing regimen with the aim of maintaining pembrolizumab exposures within the range demonstrated to provide near maximal efficacy and acceptable safety. Individual PK exposures for the selected fixed dosing regimen from recently completed trials with head and neck cancer, NSCLC, microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) in colorectal cancer (CRC) and urothelial cancer were used to confirm acceptability. To determine whether fixed dosing would maintain exposures within the range of clinical experience, the individual AUC distributions with fixed dosing were compared with the range of exposures from the pembrolizumab doses that were evaluated in early studies (2 mg/kg Q3W, 10 mg/kg Q3W/Q2W).
Body-weight dependence of clearance was characterized by a power relationship with an exponent of 0.578, a value consistent with fixed- and weight-based dosing providing similar control of PK variability. A fixed dose of 200 mg Q3W was investigated in trials based on predicted exposures maintained within the established exposure range in all patients. Mean (% CV, n) AUC was 1.87 (37%, 830), 1.38 (38%, 760) and 7.63 (35%, 1405) mg*day/mL in patients receiving 200 mg, 2 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg Q3W pembrolizumab. High-weight patients had the lowest exposures with 200 mg Q3W; however, exposures in this group (>90 kg) were within the range of prior clinical experience at 2 mg/kg Q3W associated with near maximal efficacy.
Doses of 200 mg and 2 mg/kg provide similar exposure distributions with no advantage to either dosing approach with respect to controlling PK variability. These findings suggest that weight-based and fixed-dose regimens are appropriate for pembrolizumab.
传统上,由于认为体型大小对药代动力学变异性有影响,大多数单克隆抗体(mAb)都是根据体重给药的。在最初的 pembrolizumab 研究中也采用了同样的方法;然而,在获得药代动力学数据后,重新评估了 pembrolizumab 基于体重的给药方案的必要性。
利用先前建立的群体药代动力学(popPK)模型以及晚期黑色素瘤或非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的暴露-反应结果,评估了一种固定剂量方案的潜在应用,目的是使 pembrolizumab 的暴露量保持在已证明能提供接近最大疗效和可接受安全性的范围内。最近在头颈部癌、NSCLC、结直肠癌(CRC)中微卫星不稳定性高(MSI-H)和膀胱癌中完成的试验中,使用所选固定剂量方案的个体 PK 暴露量来确认其可接受性。为了确定固定剂量是否能将暴露量维持在临床经验范围内,将固定剂量的个体 AUC 分布与早期研究中评估的 pembrolizumab 剂量的暴露量范围(2mg/kg,每 3 周一次;10mg/kg,每 3 周两次或每 2 周一次)进行比较。
清除率的体重依赖性用幂函数关系来描述,指数为 0.578,该值与固定剂量和基于体重的剂量方案相似,都能控制 PK 变异性。基于预测的暴露量,在所有患者中均保持在既定的暴露范围内,研究中考察了 200mg 每 3 周一次的固定剂量。接受 200mg、2mg/kg 和 10mg/kg 每 3 周一次 pembrolizumab 的患者的平均(%CV,n)AUC 分别为 1.87(37%,830)、1.38(38%,760)和 7.63(35%,1405)mg*天/mL。体重较高的患者接受 200mg 每 3 周一次的治疗时,暴露量最低;然而,该组(>90kg)的暴露量在与接近最大疗效相关的 2mg/kg 每 3 周一次的临床经验范围内。
200mg 和 2mg/kg 的剂量可提供相似的暴露分布,在控制 PK 变异性方面,两种剂量方案均无优势。这些发现表明,基于体重和固定剂量方案适用于 pembrolizumab。